A tour of tweets from last night’s debate:
Strikes me that @sullydish readership is polar opposite of @buzzfeed – loyal returning readers vs link traffic #smwSullyFeed
— Dan Stewart (@thatdanstewart) February 21, 2013
“We sell ads. We sell ads that actually don’t suck.” -@buzzfeedben on how @buzzfeed makes money #smwSullyFeed
— Rubina Madan Fillion (@rubinafillion) February 21, 2013
.@sullydish on branded content, “you’re *clearly* trying to trick people” #smwSullyFeed
— Taylor Lorenz (@TaylorLorenz) February 21, 2013
“Journalism has never done product placement before in its actual text.” @sullydish tells @buzzfeedben #smwSullyFeed
— Rubina Madan Fillion (@rubinafillion) February 21, 2013
I don’t understand what the issue is. Buzzfeed ads r clearly labeled. @sullydish seems to think ppl are simpletons & cnt tell #smwsullyfeed
— Cyborg (@heavenrants) February 22, 2013
Grieving, propaganda, blood money. All words used in the last 5 minutes of #smwsullyfeed
— Ashley McCollum (@McCollumAshley) February 22, 2013
@mattzeitlin I was using Lehrer in the negative sense btw. Sully and Ben basically screamed at each other the whole time and I watched
— Derek Thompson (@DKThomp) February 22, 2013
Ten Great Sully/Smith Disagreements [SPONSORED POST] #smwSullyFeed
— Alex Fitzpatrick (@AlexJamesFitz) February 22, 2013
Still buds, @sullydish and @buzzfeedben: #smwsullyfeed twitter.com/JessHullinger/…
@sullydish: Gotta say a cheesy thing. I feel so lucky to work at a place where the EIC will engage in a critical public discussion like that
— Emily Fleischaker (@emofly) February 22, 2013
— Jessica Hullinger (@JessHullinger) February 22, 2013
that was the first #smwnyc panel I’ve been to this week that actually had a meaningful debate instead of just idea-praising #smwSullyFeed
— Amanda Lucci (@alucci) February 22, 2013
This panel is actually an elaborate advertorial for Sony. #smwSullyFeed
— Marisa Kabas (@MarisaKabas) February 21, 2013
