This is now getting hilarious:
[T]he idea of me calling this guy a ‘queen’ and that being something that people thought is homophobic … a queen to me has a different meaning. It’s somebody who’s just above. It doesn’t have any necessarily sexual connotations. To me a queen… I know women that act queeny, I know men that are straight that act queeny, and I know gay men that act queeny. It doesn’t have to be a definite sexual connotation, or a homophobic connotation. To me those are people who think the rules don’t apply to them. This guy could blatantly lie, I mean blatantly lie about my wife on the internet and there are just no rules that apply to him, but that’s outrageous to me.
He somehow hasn’t come up with an explanation for why he desired to sodomize the dude with his boot, but decided not to because the dude would enjoy it too much. But we’ll wait. This raging bigot will surely come up with some reason for using that analogy that has nothing to do with homosexuality at all.
Again: the double standards for a liberal are simply astounding. Let us just stipulate that if Alec Baldwin is not a homophobe, then Mel Gibson must also now be cleared of any insinuation that he is an anti-Semite. And at least Gibson was drunk. What excuse does Baldwin have? Oh, I forgot, this one:
His rant, he said, was not “a call for violence against a specific person because they’re gay, it’s a call for violence against a person who lied about my wife.”
Seriously, bragging about calling for violence against someone is now exculpatory? Only in Hollywood …