Month: November 2006

Two words: Dog Police. Beyond vile. But you didn’t hallucinate it.

Click here to see the other entries…

You’re living in it. An appreciation from Brian Doherty.

NoHo, New York City, 6.05 am.

The Heritage Foundation hasn’t just barred Ryan Sager from their events; they have also recently snubbed Bruce Bartlett. He writes:

The Heritage event to which I was uninvited due to my criticism of Bush’s policies was not some ordinary one of the type Heritage hosts every day. It was specifically to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the 1981 tax cut. As far as I am aware, every major living figure involved in the enactment of this legislation was invited except me. I seriously doubt that any are paying contributors to the Heritage Foundation. 

The organization knows full well about my involvement in the 1981 tax cut because I was a senior fellow at Heritage for three years back in the 1980s before leaving to work for Ronald Reagan in the White House. I was, in fact, the staff person on Jack Kemp’s congressional staff who drafted the original Kemp-Roth tax cut, upon which the Reagan bill was based, back in 1977. Many others also contributed. Some of those invited to the Heritage event did not.  People can draw their own conclusions about these facts.

The best obits are always the British ones. Here’s the Guardian’s. Two great quotes:

"He always seemed on the verge of some sort of eternal defeat."

That’s from Elliott Gould. This is from Pauline Kael:

"Altman’s art, like Fred Astaire’s, is the great American art of making the impossible look easy."

"That’s not bedhead I have. It’s a perverse and juvenile form of hathead," – the sweetly nerdy Mickey Kaus.

Slate reviews the Bush administration’s new head of HHS family planning:

This is a guy who takes a neuropeptide and a prairie vole and spins from them science fiction.

It’s growing. A reader writes:

In a Redstate.com discussion thread about the prospects of a Senator Brownback bid for the Republican presidential nomination, I posted the following comment, which got me banned:

"It’s funny how everyone likes to position themselves as a True Reagan Conservative. It’s always the other guy who is betraying Reagan’s conservative legacy. Too funny. Both parties need moderates and Independents to win national elections. Until the Republican party deals with the theocracy wing of the party (Dobson, Falwell, Robertson, etc.), moderates/Independents will likely fall in favor of the Dems. It’s really that simple. If you think Brownback is the guy to bridge that gap, you need to stop smokin’ that Bible and get back to reality.

The lesson from 06 is that moderation wins general elections and offers the best hope for sustained governability through the art of political compromise. Rigid uncompromising devotion to ideology may feel good but it usually accomplishes little and ultimately undermines the ideology."

I was subsequently banned from the site for using the term "theocracy" in relation to a faction within the Republican party. The denial is deep and perhaps even pathological. I fear it will take more than one election cycle to shock the party back to reality.

Scotland may soon be a separate country.

And Bob Reich’s breach of Green Room etiquette.