The Weekly Wrap

WeeklyWrapImage

By Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Today on the Dish, Andrew debated Frum on Romney's foreign policy, saw through modern Republican courage and wondered how bad the Eastwood buzz was for Romney. He also spelled out why Obama must explain sequestration. After Romney and the Republicans mocked climate change, Pareene took them to task. Earlier, Kevin Roose broke down why the Bain bailout didn't directly screw taxpayers. Then Nate Cohn explained convention bounces, Greg Scoblete marveled at the GOP's "repudiation" of limited foreign policy and while the ad war remained relatively calm, readers wondered about anti-Obama ads on the Dish. Brad Plumer then passed along bad economic news and Felix Salmon dismissed the likelihood of Fed action.

In empty chair news, the interwebs made fun of Eastwood, Goldblog transcribed the Ayatollah debate, bloggers analyzed #Eastwooding, and readers overthought Clint's subtext.

As Netanyahu's government destroyed Palestinian homes, Andrew marveled at the indifference. Swaziland's King Mswati III ruled by witchcraft, Minxin Pei worried about China's decline and a Spaniard demonstrated. Also, China practiced male homosexuality throughout the ages.

In assorted commentary, Andrew promised to review new research on IQ, while Robert Gonzales assessed pot's effect on same. Barton Swaim poleaxed academic writing, textbook prices outpaced inflation and Johnny Depp became Comanche. Farmers fed cows candy, Marc Tracy profiled Buzfeed, and cooking when you're tired sucked. Meanwhile, Hanna talked matriarchy, Brewster Kahle saved – literally – the internet and a dad donned a skirt. As Gideon Lewis-Kraus investigated Maru and cat cafes, ferrets proved loyal. The world's richest woman then scolded the poor, water balloons exploded and VFYW here.

The rest of the week after the jump:

US_Threat

Thursday on the Dish, Andrew live-blogged Tampa Day 3, tore into the "spectacular vacuousness" of Romney's speech, and, responding to Frum's speculation on Romney's foreign policy, doubted the nominee's backbone. Blogger reax of Romney's speech here and Twitter reax here.

In Tampa Day 2 coverage, Andrew eviscerated Paul Ryan's many lies, Suderman called Ryan out on Medicare, and readers reacted, weighing in on Susana Martinez, in particular. Fred Kaplan was miffed by McCain's and Rice's gall and Steve Coll dismissed Christie's leadership skills. Alex Blagg nominated Ryan for Boy Detective and Comedy Central evaluated the RNC joke success rate. And in the run-up to Romney's acceptance speech, Charlie Cook contended that the it was the most important of his campaign, Millman labeled Romney a leader that "nobody wants to follow," and a chart of the day presented the GOP concept of imminent threats.

Meanwhile, as the campaign aired a slew of Bain ads, Tim Dickinson revealed the extortionate style of Romney's negotiation for the bailout of Bain and readers asked whether the new evidence meant he "didn't build that." Tax experts proved that Romney's plan requires raising middle-class taxes and Matt Taibbi excoriated Romney as emblematic of "lunatic pursuit of instant borrowed millions." In other election coverage, Nyhan mulled the impact of fact-checking, Martin Wolff framed Murdoch's Romney dilemma, and Lindsey Graham lamented the loss of "angry white guys." Obama outflanked mainstream media via Reddit, CNN's camerawoman spoke out on racism at the RNC and Patrick Ruffini noted the marketing style of modern campaign-craft. Nate Silver ID'ed Ohio as a key swing state, a fake ad took "legitimate rape" to its logical extreme, and Michael Moore advised people to start practicing saying "President Romney."

In assorted coverage, Andrew called attention to Sandusky apologism from Father Benedict Groeschel and Syria's body count grew. Stephen Burd wanted a new student loan system, Matt Shafeek praised slow-build comedy, and while Kevin Carey reported on online education efforts, the digital natives were restless. Hanna Rosin discussed the upshot of the end of men, Hollywood exposed itself to piracy, pink flamingos roosted in suburbia and a fat reader cut into the tight workout clothing concept. As Isaac raged, a FOTD captured a displaced mother and child in Kentwood, Louisiana, and, on a brighter note, reporters weathered the hurricane hilariously. Old Spice swooning here, VFYW here and a Robert Herrick poem here.

Sechelt-British Columbia-12pm

Sechelt, British Columbia, 12 pm

Wednesday on the Dish, Andrew live-blogged Ryan's acceptance speech, followed by reader reax here. Earlier in the day, he called Romney-Ryan's foreign policy Dickish and highlighted a piece by Mike Lofgren on materialism's eclipse of conservatism. Crowley pondered how Ryan could credibly address Medicare in his speech, and while Leon Wieseltier unloaded on him, the veep candidate's numbers slid.

Reviewing yesterday's convention news, Andrew condemned CNN for its dismissal of a racist RNC incident, while readers pushed back. Andy McCarthy slammed Christie, and as Douthat praised Ann Romney's speech, Noonan noted how it perpetuated Romney's hollowness. Alex Altman called last night a "diversity pageant" and Andrew made the conservative case for Obama on The Colbert Report here.

Looking ahead, Andrew flagged a fascinating LDS discussion about Romney, and while some readers clarified Romney's LDS standing, others pinpointed relgious authorities in US political history. Drum remarked on Romney's brazen lying, John Sides reframed his challenge and Romney feted top donors aboard the Cracker Bay. 

While Andrew reflected on humor and politics, Douthat advised the Paulites and Hanna Rosin fielded readers' abortion question. Yglesias then parsed the GOP platform, Team Obama thronged Florida and TNC observed Romney's double standard on affirmative action. Suzy Khimm investigated the party-switching penalty as Noam Scheiber reported on Joe's presidential designs. And while Sarah Palin jumped the shark (yet again), journalists ceded control at conventions and Patrick Gavin's Twitter meta-ed

In assorted commentary, Paul Rozin rehabilitated recycled water, Maria Bustillos praised Lester Bangs' literary tastes and Teju Cole told of a near-blindness bout. Bill Nye dressed down creationists, Emily Landau examined Rakoff's and Hitchens' contributions to the dying debate, and Oliver Morton potrayed flowing power.

@ then baffled, Frank Jacobs lamented a Disney ride and Sonic blotted out Texas. The Swedish chef spoke a dialect of Norwegian sing-song, FOTD here, VFYW here and MHB here.

150890279

By Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Tuesday on the Dish, Andrew explained why Clinton must "punch hard" and made the case that "every sane conservative" should vote for Obama. After Chait argued that the current GOP has met the end of its era, Andrew live-blogged the "historical second first day of the convention," as Colbert had it (upon whose show, incidentally, he appeared tonight).

Andrew also pondered Romney's willingness to embrace his role as a religious authoritah – particularly given that, as a reader pointed out, Romney's a "high priest." He then speculated on the RNC Thursday-night mystery guest as David Von Drehle considered Ann Romney's rhetorical approach.

In more convention coverage, Mark Thoma ranted about the GOP's self-defeating, hypocritical take on infrastructure spending, Dolan agreed to close out the DNC as well, and Shafer and Jarvis debated the value of conventions. While the blogosphere dissected the GOP's just-resurrected fixation on the gold standard, a Romney staffer poo-pooed fact-checking. But mind you, only partisans watched any of this.

Meanwhile, Mike Lofgren broke down the difference between income and payroll taxes, Monica Potts outlined five things governments do best and a pro-Obama super PAC released an ad on Romney's Massachusetts record.

Elsewhere in the world, Roy Robins took in the slaughter in South Africa, cartels ran money through big banks and a cancer sufferer shared her experience savoring sex. James Parker parsed "asshole," the frozen north melted and readers debunked Max Fisher's Psy interpretation. David Dow and Dylan Matthews weighed the value of harsh punishments, Chinese pigs rutted, and the eskimo-ified Ecce Homo drew adoring masses.

Boomers watched ever-more movies, readers aired views on Lance Armstrong, and Michael Wood analyzed Philip Larkin's "rear-guard nationalism." Readers then offered more views on condoms, Jesse Bering shed light on female ejaculation and the sun set ruddily. And while a syphilis outbreak plagued the porn industry, Jack Lowe judged coporate logo value and readers ultimately found Cork. MHB here, VFYW here, and FOTD here.

Effed

Monday on the Dish, Andrew analyzed the personal character of both Romney and Ryan, hailed The Economist's editorial on Romney and missed Hitch's jokes. After hailing the corner-turning in the culture war, he then lamented the extremism of the Republican Party, and as the American Academy of Pediatrics endorsed circumcision, Andrew stood firm in his opposition.

Chris Matthews went to town on Reince Priebus and the GOP, Issac threatened and
Barone observed how counterintuitive convention bounces can be. Moore-style Republican "documentaries" arrived, Hanna Rosin defended the convention tradition, Daniel McCarthy pilloried the GOP for its "mercenary fusionism," and Romney's birther joke raised reader hackles. Meanwhile, as the GOP kept going with its baseless welfare attack, Obama's team released its Tampa onslaught. And the first class warfare ad aired in 1912.

Looking abroad, an Israeli rabbi called for obliteration of the Iranian regime, Gideon Rachmann unhooked himself, and New Zealand announced its withdrawal from Afghanistan. And as Max Fisher explicated the subversive elements of "Gangnam Style," a readers reflected on the excruciation of cataloguing child pornography.

While Anthony Lane eulogized Neil Armstrong, the blogosphere debated another Armstrong's decision. Yglesias grumbled about the "pinch to zoom" verdict, Adam Frucci argued that sexy women were indeed funny and Jesse Bering discussed gay adaptation. And as Garret Keizer explained why privacy is sacred, farters met with punishment in some cultures. Andrew highlighted a bear culture slide-show, readers called "sexism" in Dish sports coverage and car sickness affected women more. Meanwhile, David Brancaccio investigated why we don't share our salaries, Kal Raustiala and Chris Sprigman mulled marijuana branding and snug clothes helped with weight loss.  Cute Andrew picture and anniversary shout-out here, MHB here, Cool Ad Watch here and VFYW here. And don't forget to vote on Ask Hanna Rosin anything!

GT_PHYLLIS-DILLER_120824

By Ron Galella/Wire Image

Saturday and Sunday on the Dish, books and literary coverage held sway. Mark O'Connell pondered the "Amis Hatchet Job," J. Robert Lennon and Richard Brody analyzed the negative review, Jeanie Riess sampled literary food blogs, Charles Simic applauded the impractical motivation of poets, and Jesse Bering considered his writing's impact on his sex life (he also dispelled pernicious myths about gay men). As the Republican convention drew near, Ayn Rand made two appearances – Alan Wolfe gave the unflattering reason why academics might need to study her and Judith Therman detailed Rand's telling correspondence with Laura Ingalls Wilder's daughter. We also noted David Foster Wallace's faux dictionary entries and the unintended fates of literary estates. Read Saturday's poem here and Sunday's here.

In religious news, Matthew Bowman profiled the Mormon self-help guru Stephen Covey, Jesse Bering answered a reader's question about the evolutionary advantages of belief in God, David Sugarman explored Herman Melville's complex spirituality, Rowan Williams described how we experience mercy, Wan Yong proved that Jesus really was King David's descendant, and Matt Ridley showed how apocalyptic thinking isn't just for believers. And, of course, how could considerations of religion ignore the hucksters and frauds? Scott K. Johnson reminded us that creationism is out of step with Christian tradition and a Canadian pastor claimed physical violence could heal the sick.

In assorted coverage, Hannah Kaviani reported on social media's impact on disaster relief in Iran, Ashley Fetters remembered the time Phyllis Diller posed for Playboy, Pierre Manent proved to be a believer in American exceptionalism, Scott Aikin and Robert Talisse explained the real meaning of civility, and William Flesch contended that mortality and altruisum were linked. Joe Hanson pointed to Van Gogh's possible color-blindness, Benjamin Sutton further scrutinized the touch-up-a-masterpiece meme, Lisa Miller summarized a new book on the genetically-tinged future of personal ads, Hunter Oatman-Stanford charted the vagaries of contraception in America, Steven Zeitchik examined the NC-17 rating, John Gravois argued against tipping, and researchers checked the raw sewage of European cities to find out what drugs they used. FOTDs here and here, MHBs here and here, VFYWs here and here, and the latest window contest here.

G.G.

Ad War Update: Romney Said … What?

The Obama campaign responds to last night's festivities:

They also put out a web video contesting Romney's speech, point by point:

And to mark the second anniversary of the end of combat operations in Iraq, the campaign released a video featuring pro-Obama sentiment from veterans – it's sure to be a theme at next week's convention:

Not much from the other side today, though the conservative outside group Emergency Committee For Israel did release a love letter to Paul Ryan (ad buy size/scope unknown):

And wannabe swift-boat group OPSEC released a one-minute web ad hitting the president on leaks (ad buy size/scope unknown):

In downticket news, the GOP's Senate candidate in Montana, Denny Rehberg, brings out the twins to link his Democratic opponent, Jon Tester, to Obama:

Lastly, in more general news, Pandora Internet Radio has been a big player in the political ad game this cycle, as Seth Cline explains:

Unlike most Internet display ads, Pandora's ads make impressions upon users who, even if only listening passively, cannot avoid an ad simply by looking away. Pandora also has more than 150 million registered users and in many places is the most listened-to radio station. But perhaps the biggest reason Pandora attracts political types is targeting – political campaigns can customize which listeners hear what ads based on where they live, how old they are, and even what type of music they listen to.

"On Pandora we know exactly who our audience is, so if you're trying to reach moms, the D.C. area, or young people in Ohio, we can do that," says Francisca Fanucchi, a spokeswoman for Pandora. When users sign up for Pandora, they give their ZIP code, gender, date of birth, and E-mail address, all of which are used for targeting purposes, Fanucchi says. This customization makes Pandora ideal for microtargeting, a strategy used by political groups to identify very specific types of potential voters–like "liberal leaning post-graduate singles" or "middle-aged commuters near Philadelphia"–by mining large amounts of data such as credit card records and Internet histories

Ad War archive here.

Is There A Limit To IQ? On Weed?

Robert Gonzalez goes over the results of a new study regarding the effects of marijuana use on the IQs of adolescents:

The study followed 1,037 New Zealanders from birth through age 38, monitoring their IQs and marijuana usage throughout. IQ tests were administered first at age 13 (before the test subjects had started smoking pot), and again at 38, "after a a pattern of persistent cannabis use had developed." The findings reveal that test subjects who smoked heavily throughout adolescence suffered an average drop of eight points in their IQ scores. According to Madeline H. Meier, first author of the study, this impairment was most prevalent among adolescent-onset cannabis users[.]

Gonzalez distills the findings:

[T]he question of "how much" [use] is arguably less important than "when," or "what age?" The fact that cognitive impairment was detected in adolescent-onset smokers and not adult-onset smokers is highly suggestive that weed has a neurotoxic effect on the developing adolescent brain (what Meier and her colleagues refer to as the "developmental vulnerability hypothesis"), a conclusion that gels with a number of previous studies.

Internet-Famous In Japan, Ctd

5686158811_7b48140874_b

The author of the article on Japan's internet cats also investigated its cat cafes. It begins:

It’s hard to recollect much about my first cat café besides the unmitigated pleasure of the whole experience. The place was called Cateriam, on the second floor of a nondescript building in Shimokitazawa, and it had the cozy feel of overpriced daycare, with lots of low stools and pillows, but also with branches chained to the ceiling, and plush beehive-shaped hidey-huts, and cats.

There were maybe ten or twelve of them (cats). There were little placards on the walls with their names, specs, and Twitter feeds. My brother Micah and I sat there along with two Japanese adolescents on a date—cat cafés, one of Micah’s friends subsequently told us, with some discomfort, are apparently big date spots—and we watched some cats drowse.

Meanwhile in the US, a cat-video film festival was held last night in Minneapolis. Winner here.

(Photo by Paul Miller)

Face Of The Day

GT_SPAIN-PROTESTER_120831

An activist of the SAT Andalucian trade union reacts during a march from La Zubia to Granada to denounce the Spanish government's handling of the economic crisis and its latest austerity measures, on August 31, 2012. In Andalucia, a region particularly hard hit by recession due to the collapse of the local construction industry, the unemployment rate is nearly 34 percent, higher than Spain's overall rate of roughly 25 percent. By Cristina Quicler/AFP/Getty Images.

China’s Homosexual History

Richard Burger discusses the most surprising findings of his new book, Behind the Red Door: Sex in China:

For centuries [male homosexuality] was widely practiced, mainly by the literati and ruling classes, though there is plenty of evidence of same-sex love between ordinary Chinese, even in the countryside. As long as these men married and had children, it was acceptable for them to carry on affairs with men outside the home. Many emperors kept male lovers along with their harems of concubines. Han Dynasty scribes actually catalogued the emperors’ male lovers. Homosexuality was not an identity, it was something men simply did for entertainment, and often to display their class privilege.

This all changed when Mao took over in 1949, after which "homosexuality was labeled both a psychological disorder and an act of hooliganism." Previous Dish coverage of China's homosexual taboo here and here.

Chart Of The Day

Low_Wage_Jobs

Bradford Plumer passes along some bad economic news:

new report (pdf) from the National Employment Law Project finds that low-wage jobs, paying $13.83 per hour or less, have dominated the recovery to date. In many cases, they appear to be replacing higher-paying jobs that were lost in the first place.

Professors’ Poseur Problems

Barton Swaim reviews Helen Storm's new style guide for the writers of academia. The problem:

Academics in the humanities and the social sciences, it’s sometimes suggested, too often wish to give their fields the legitimacy and public authority of science, and so write in highly technical, jargon-laced prose. Academics in the hard sciences, for their part, are too concerned with factual correctness to worry about making their productions agreeable, even to co-specialists. Then, of course, there is the really uncharitable interpretation: Many academics simply haven’t got anything useful to say, but if they say it in a sufficiently complicated fashion and use all the vogue terms, they’ll get credit for having said something without saying anything worth defending. The really troublesome thing about all this is that many academic writers, even in the humanities, have legitimate and important insights to convey. Yet they genuinely believe, whether for one of the aforementioned reasons or for some other, that it doesn’t serve their interests to write straightforward English sentences.

Becoming Comanche

Lone_Ranger

Stacy Thacker is nonplussed by Johnny Depp's recent adoption by the Comanche tribe, which seems to relate to his having potrayed Tonto in The Lone Ranger:

Does that mean he can now apply for tribal scholarships? Can he list this on job applications and get jobs that have Native preference? (Not that he would need to of course….) While I love Johnny Depp and think that everything he has done with Tim Burton is pure magic I can't help but think that maybe this role is being taken a little too seriously. However if you decide to adopt a celebrity into your tribe, Johnny Depp is a good choice. Thank goodness Burt Reynolds wasn't adopted into the Navajo Tribe for "Navajo Joe."

Meanwhile, Dave Baldrige explains why, for many, the issue isn't merely a theoretical one:

While Native Americans have some of the worst health status, and Congress has tried to create an opportunity for them to access more health care resources [via the Affordable Care Act], this intent may be thwarted by a simple misunderstanding of the definition of American Indian. As federal agencies can't even agree about the definition of American Indian, once again, the U.S. government will have failed its trust responsibility to American Indians and Alaska Natives.

Baldridge illustrates with an example of past bureaucratic strife:

One of my best friends, a Cherokee elder, spoke the language fluently, was deeply couched in traditional spirituality, yet could not find public records to prove that he was an American Indian. His ancestors had settled in Missouri, outside of tribal lands, and so had missed being listed on the Dawes Roll created around 1900 and used as a criteria for determining who is a descendent eligible for Cherokee citizenship. His quest for identity became obsessive before he died of cardiac arrest, still unrecognized as an American Indian — still ineligible for care from the Indian Health Service.

(Photo of Johnny Depp as Tonto in Lone Ranger producer Jerry Bruckheimer's Twitter feed)

Back To $chool

Danielle Kurtzleben examines the business of textbooks, the prices of which rise at double the rate of inflation. The industry defends its high prices:

According to [publishing industry rep Bruce] Hildebrand, developing and producing a textbook takes three to five years on average, and can be even take more than a decade for some science books. When students plunk down hundreds of dollars for academic tomes, he says, they are paying for this labor-intensive process. For this reason, e-textbooks that are gaining prominence in the marketplace may not be much cheaper than their physical counterparts. Content, not paper, is the key cost in producing a book, says Rich Hershman, director of government relations at NACS. And the cost of bringing textbooks into the digital age may even push book costs higher. … It's not just high-tech add-ons that are pushing the price of the books. Publishers claim that old-fashioned reselling adds to the cost. "The single greatest contributor to the price of a textbook is a used textbook," says Hildebrand. As students use these as substitutes for new books, in other words, it creates fiscal pressures on publishers.