EMAIL OF THE DAY

A statement of the obvious:

“It seems to me that maybe something that goes without saying needs to be said again– one of the steps that any sane policymaker would take to slow the resurgence of HIV infection among gay men would be to recognize– and, indeed, encourage– gay marriages. Obviously, marriage is not for everyone, straight or gay, but the availability of marriage inarguably decreases the spread of STD’s among straights. Why wouldn’t it have the same effect among gays? It certainly couldn’t hurt.
And by the way, I don’t think the effect would be limited to those gays who actually get married. After all, the dating patterns of many straights are geared towards eventual marriage, i.e., “settling down” with the right person. Thus, many straights who are not married are in long-term monogamous relationships with people that they are considering marrying at some point. These straights are at low risk for spreading STD’s just as married straights are.
If there is a resurgence of HIV infection among gays– and I hope that isn’t the case– it seems to me that it would simply constitute one more reason why gays should have the same right to marry as straights do.”

Absolutely. When you look at the crystal meth epidemic or the underlying psychological reasons to pursue sex for sex’s sake, you have to include the fact that gay teens and gay men have close to no social incentives for coupling or monogamy. One reason I support civil marriage is to change the dynamic for the socialization of homosexuals, to tackle the low self-esteem that can lead to social problems, to give gay kids a sense of a real and responsible future, rather than simply a void where they will be condemned however they live their lives. Marriage will save and lengthen gay lives, as it saves and lengthens straight ones. There will be no ultimate solution to HIV in the next gay generation without it.

THE CASE FOR OPTIMISM

Greg Djerejian is back with a vengeance. He’s a mild optimist about the Middle East, and sees the emergence of a real movement toward democracy there as deeply encouraging. And that’s why he’s concerned, as I am, with our self-inflicted wounds. We are engaged in a war of ideas as well as bullets. And we have been hobbling ourselves with misguided decisions.

“BLACK GIRL”: Or whoever. (Hat tip: Boozhy.)

IN CASE YOU’RE WONDERING

Bo.

QUOTE OF THE DAY: “‘Vicious little punks’? Please. I’d say theirs was a healthy response. The only thing they did wrong in my book was kicking him while he was down. They were certainly right to knock this old perv’s block off when he laid his hands on one of them. I’d like to buy those hoods a Coke… To paraphrase the Misfit, the Church would be a better place if there were punks there beating up cruisy clerics every single day of the Church’s life. If a priest or anyone else ever propositioned my kid like this, if my kid wasn’t in a position to break the perv’s nose, I’d go find him and do it.”- Rod Dreher, of the Dallas Morning News.

FROM THE FILES

Maybe these newly declassified affidavits and depositions taken during the official investigation into Abu Ghraib can illuminate the Koran abuse mystery a little more. The following deposition is interesting because it is by a U.S. interrogator, not an inmate, and refers to a technique within the military-approved term “Pride and Ego Down” that was apparently already in use. Here’s the first deposition, dated 5/21/04. It is from someone who was

“part of a five person Mobile Training Team from Fort Huachuca, AZ. The mission of my team was to provide an overall assessment of interrogation operations, training and advice and assistance. My focus was interrogation operations … The Intelligence Rules of Engagement (IROE) was posted and was very similar to that IROE used in Afghanistan. During my observation of interrogation operations, the 519th demonstrated experience and dedication to the mission. Most techniques required a very specific written plan with a schedule and parameters. The MP’s appeared to be in control and professional I did see detainees in various states of undress to include nakedness and detainees wearing towels. The MP’s used segregation and stripping as a way to keep the detainees under control and to keep them from talking. On one occasion, I had a conversation with XXXXX, concerning the IROE and interrogation approaches. I gave him examples of approaches including Pride and Ego Down where an interrogator took a Koran, threw it on the floor and stepped on it and Fear Up Harsh where the interrogator had a dog trained to bark on cue if the interrogator thought the detainee was lying. I also explained sleep deprivation. I told him that in Afghanistan the interrogators could use an adjusted sleep schedule for detainees. The conversation was meant to explain why these activities were prohibited or restricted.

This is a little confusing. The person seems to be conflating approved and unapproved techniques – monitored sleep deprivation (approved) and Koran abuse (barred) respectively – and then saying that she was detailing them to show why they “were prohibited or restricted.” Both? Why? A subsequent deposition, which appears to be by the same person (but might not be) was taken on 06/30/04. Here’s the money quote:

I told him of a story I heard in Afghanistan of a dog used during an interrogation. The dog was trained to bark on cue and would bark any time the interrogator had reason to believe the detainee was lying during the interrogation. I told him this would probably not be allowed but that the presence of barking dogs in the prison might be effective. I told him of a story of an interrogator using and Pride and Ego Down approach. The interrogator took a copy of the Koran and threw it on the ground and stepped on the Koran, which resulted in a detainee riot. .. I never personally witnessed the above incidents, but heard about them from other interrogation facility personnel…

I don’t know what to make of this. The witness seems to be saying that s/he was referring to methods that were not authorized, and then s/he says they had already been used in Afghanistan. We may here be seeing part of the confusion in policy that helped make Bagram, Abu Ghraib and the torture in Basra, Tikrit and elsewhere possible, confusion for which no one has been held accountable.

FUNDAMENTALISM WATCH

It’s worrying enough that we find that some Christian fundamentalists have undermined the Air Force Academy. It’s bad enough that some extremists seem to think that this is a good way to win a war of ideas against extremist Islam. But when our own military seems to be advertizing an explicitly Christian identity in Iraq, then it’s time the president took action. Whoever in the marines allowed this tank to be defaced in this way needs to be removed from his post. It’s an outrage – to both the New Testament and to our mission in Iraq.

HIV NOW: Thanks for your emails of concern. I’ll be fine. My point is simply to write more candidly about some of the issues facing gay men two decades after HIV first emerged. A good critique of my points can be found here. A candid elaboration of some of the issues is contained in this email:

First, I’m sorry to hear of your latest numbers. I know all too well what it’s like to pass a week every three months hoping that your labs will confirm that your choices are working and your options are open.
Second, you’re right that HIV care has gotten a helluva lot easier. Since I seroconverted about two years ago, I’ve been on a twice-a-day combo that even comes with the special gift of far-out fabulous dreams, courtesy of Sustiva. I still have worries – any career break that might mean suspending health insurance is a complete non-starter, for example. But on the whole it’s been relatively easy, so much so that my biggest challenge for a while has been convincing myself, and fully internalizing, that I actually have this thing, that I am HIV+.
And that same unreality around HIV drove my sexual choices back when I seroconverted. The scare tactics didn’t do much for me any more; all I had was a vague moral sense that using condoms was the right thing to do. And let’s face it, even the most conservative of us gay men instinctively repels just a little bit at the sense of external moral threats. Unfortunately that instinct was just strong enough to keep me from talking openly with my other gay friends about the disappearance of condoms from my bedside, and I never really had the conversation I needed until after I was diagnosed.
I have a hunch, based purely on anecdotal evidence, that HIV is on the rise among educated, middle-class gay men. The stats don’t reflect that yet, but I’ve seen myself and others similarly situated victimize themselves in the double-bind I just described. In the heat of the moment, the instrumental calculus just isn’t going to inspire you to wrap it up. But the lingering moral tsk-tsk makes any failure to wrap it up all but unsayable. We have to figure out a way to get beyond this impasse. Or we need a working microbicide. Behavior modification has its limits, and I think we’ve met them.

Criticism of people with HIV can only go so far. In consensual private adult sex, after all, no gay man can claim innocence of danger any more. My own modest suggestion is an ad campaign focusing on the possible physical effects of HIV and HIV meds. Appealing to some men’s vanity by portraying people with AIDS as emaciated or suffering from lipodystrophy might help: it’s a more tangible threat than a very distant and vague health menace in a decade or so. I should also add that I don’t want to minimize the negative impact of HIV on my life. I went through hell for a while, and a terror that required all my psychological and spiritual resources to face down. (My memoir of this is contained in “Love Undetectable,” the book I’m proudest of.) The paradox is that if you have marshalled the capacity to face down a life-threatening condition, you have to some extent conquered fear. And conquering fear is contagious. In fact, my very existence as a happy, healthy, productive man with HIV is in itself undermining the safer sex message. Success means failure. But what am I to do? Wear a burka? Pretend I’m close to death?

THE LATEST

I’ve just refreshed the pieces posted at left. My conservatism essay is now up in full; along with reflections on a year of civil marriage for all in Massachusetts; and a take on the “Toilet Wars” between Bush and the press. Check ’em out.

EMAIL OF THE DAY II: “Re: The Deal. You confirmed for me what I already knew – it’s a raw one for the GOP. The very fact that a bigot like yourself likes it proves to me that Republicans got screwed. AND you got what you really wanted – pIss off the right-wing base in hopes of depressing 2006 turnout so you can gain seats and secularize American culture.
This is far from over. Bush is not going to nominate O’Connor for Chief Justice – get a clue! She will probably retire soon anyway. Scalia for Chief Justice and someone of like mind to succeed him on the Court. You know it, I know it and the left knows it. At that point, the GOP will have to pull the trigger and morons like Lindsey Graham will vote their constituents’ interest or be bludgeoned to political death in the next primary. Conservatives still hold the cards Andrew. Don’t go wetting your “sane” self just yet.” Charming. And accurate.