Month: July 2005

John Cole takes names on blaming the media for a bungled war.

EMAIL OF THE DAY: “I happen to be a freelance writer who covers HR issues for a number of trade publications. I’ve been researching lately this very issue of immigration and same-sex marriage, as well as the issue of whether or not gay and lesbian employees are now requesting that they be transferred to Canada or whether recruiters are getting requests from gay and lesbians to find them jobs in Canada. One recruiter responded by telling me this:

“Certainly companies here are worried about losing skilled workers to countries with more reasonable laws regarding same-sex marriages. Many have lobbied for laws recognizing these unions and have fought any legislation that would outlaw them. About half of the Fortune 500 now extend benefits to same-sex partners. Even Wal-Mart – a notoriously conservative company headquartered in the heart of the Bible belt – has loosened its definition of immediate family members so that it could include same-sex partners and they added sexual orientation to its non-discrimination policy. If employers do start losing skilled candidates to Canada, they are likely to become even more vocal in their support of legal recognition of same sex marriages.”

As part of my research I also got a tip about the P& G purchase of Gillette, and the attempt to move employees from Massachusetts to Ohio. Apparently the issue of some employees not wanting to move has come up because their marriages would not be recognized in Ohio. I haven’t confirmed it, but it does show that this is an emerging issue for companies that they will have to deal with.”

A reader corrects me:

I think you understate the fight over the O’Connor vacancy by calling it war. Rehnquist would have been war. This will be nothing short of total devastation.

Well, let’s not get too excitable, shall we? I mean, it’s not as if a gay couple got married or something.

Zogby polls the Bush pep-talk and sees little change in public opinion. Two in five even favor impeachment if it is proven that the president deliberately misled the country into war. How do Democrats beef up their national security credentials when their base is this angry at the Iraq war? It’s a tough political crevice to cling to. Greg Djerejian explains why he was underwhelmed by the speech as well. UPDATE: Brendan Nyhan asks some pertinent questions about the Zogby poll.

O’Connor quits. The war begins.

ON THE BRIGHT SIDE: A reader cautions against excessive pessimism over Iraq:

The still-forming Iraqi army remains, for the time being, behind the product of many years of terrorist camp training. Yet, we are seeing signs of success. The next stage, once the Iraqis pull even or ahead on the learning curve and acquire the depth of personnel that will allow sophisticated counter-terror, counter-intelligence operations, infiltration of enemy ranks becomes possible. Over time and with perhaps a bit of guidance from us and others on how to manage and use inside information most effectively, I believe there is a good, maybe excellent, chance that profound progress can be made. I am obviously an optimist, but not without cause. Recruiting is up in Iraq even if flat here. They do seem to want their own country and they do not seem happy with being terror bombed. They are not running, they are fighting back. This is healthy. Further, while it seems that most here in the US are alarmed at the number of foreign fighters coming to Iraq, there is something positive to be said about this development as well. The object in conventional war is to locate and destroy the enemy. Where once diffuse, those with sufficient levels of animosity such that they are motivated to make the trip to Iraq and fight are precisely those we need to locate and destroy. The process, as in any war, features setbacks as well as successes. Time will tell, but the signs are not all bad.

Fair points. I can also see the logic behind Kenneth Pollack’s practical proposals today. Accelerating reconstruction in areas of relative calm must obviously be a priority; and basic law and order would help as well.

A former physician for the president’s father weighs in:

Today, however, it seems as though our government and the military have slipped into Joseph Conrad’s “Heart of Darkness.” The widespread reports of torture and ill-treatment — frequently based on military and government documents — defy the claim that this abusive behavior is limited to a few noncommissioned officers at Abu Ghraib or isolated incidents at Guantanamo Bay. When it comes to torture, the military’s traditional leadership and discipline have been severely compromised up and down the chain of command. Why? I fear it is because the military has bowed to errant civilian leadership… America cannot continue down this road. Torture demonstrates weakness, not strength. It does not show understanding, power or magnanimity. It is not leadership. It is a reaction of government officials overwhelmed by fear who succumb to conduct unworthy of them and of the citizens of the United States.

How inspiring to read such clarity. How horrifying that it has come to this.