Year: 2005

In the circular firing squad that is now the conservative movement, Brent Scowcroft will soon fire off a few rounds of ammo. I heard rumors last week. Steve Clemons has more.

QUOTE FOR THE DAY: “And I’ll finish just by bringing it down screechingly to the ground and tell you that the detainee abuse issue is just such a concrete example of what I’ve just described to you, that 10 years from now or so when it’s really, really put to the acid test, ironed out and people have looked at it from every angle, we are going to be ashamed of what we allowed to happen. I don’t know how many people saw the “Frontline” documentary last night – very well done, I thought, but didn’t get anywhere near the specifics that need to be shown, that need to come out, that need to say to the American people, this is not us, this is not the way we do business in the world. Of course we have criminals, of course we have people who violate the law of war, of course we had My Lai, of course we had problems in the Korean War and in World War II. My father-in-law was involved in the Malme?dy massacre and the retaliation of U.S. troops in Belgium. He told me some stories before he died that made my blood curdle about American troops killing Germans.

But these are not — I won’t say isolated incidents; these are incidents that are understandable and that ultimately, at one time or another, we came to deal with. I don’t think, in our history, we’ve ever had a presidential involvement, a secretarial involvement, a vice-presidential involvement, an attorney general involvement in telling our troops essentially carte blanche is the way you should feel. You should not have any qualms because this is a different kind of conflict. Well, I’ll admit that. I’ll admit that. I don’t want to see any of these people ever released from prison if they’re truly terrorists. I don’t want to see them released because I know what they’ll do. I’m a former military man, 31 years in the Army. They will go out and they will try to kill me and my buddies, again and again, and some of you people, too.

So I understand the radical change in the nature of our enemy, but that doesn’t mean we make a radical change in the nature of America. But that’s what we did, and we did it in private. We did it in such privacy that the secretary of State had to open the door into my office one day – we had adjoining offices and he liked to do that, and I never objected – he came through the door and he said, Larry, Larry, get everything, get all the paperwork, get the ICRC reports, get everything; I think this is going to be a real mess. And Will Taft, his lawyer, got the same instruction from a legal point of view. And Will and I worked together for almost a year as the ICRC reports began to build and come in, and Kellenberger even came in and visited with the secretary of State. And we knew that things weren’t the way they should be, and as former soldiers, we knew that you don’t have this kind of pervasive attitude out there unless you’ve condoned it – unless you’ve condoned it. And whether you did it explicitly or not is irrelevant. If you did it at all, indirectly, implicitly, tacitly – you pick the word – you’re in trouble because that slippery slope is truly slippery, and it will take years to reverse the situation, and we’ll probably have to grow a new military.” – Lawrence Wilkerson, Colin Powell’s former chief of staff, recounting the profound, irreparable damage president Bush has done to the honor and integrity of the U.S. military – and to the meaning of America itself.

An interesting digest of what the GOP now represents:

Number of Pork Projects in Federal Spending Bills

2005 – 13,997
2004 – 10,656
2003 – 9,362
2002 – 8,341
2001 – 6,333
2000 – 4,326
1999 – 2,838
1998 – 2100
1997 – 1,596
1996 – 958
1995 – 1439

Notice the doubling under Bush and his big-spending cronies and allies. You think these people will respond to “PorkBusters” campaigns? Puh-lease. They’ll respond only when they are thrown out of office.

An emailer from an unlikely place comments on my essay (which is free for as.com readers after a quick registration process):

Thanks for your thoughtful essay. I’m a straight, 39 year-old guy who learned a lot from it. An interesting parallel struck me: I’m a Russian-speaker and studied at a Soviet literary institute in 1986, before Gorbachev’s reforms had taken hold, and was exposed through friends to the vibrant samizdat culture of the time. Marvelous works that could never have passed the official sensors for publication, such as Venedikt Yerofeyev’s Moskva-Petushki, passed from hand to hand and were copied in pen or typed. An elderly lady I met held informal art showings in her apartment, including modernist religious paintings. Young people would head with a few hours’ notice to the woods outside the outer ring of Moscow to hear impromptu acoustic concerts by underground bands. There was a stratum of Soviet bohemenians who were far more cultured and literate than their counterparts in the West, who survived through menial day jobs in archives or museums, and lived semi-secret lives of creativity and expression. In the late 1980s, this subculture very temporarily exploded into the mainstream, as glasnost allowed publication of long-banned works and everyone on the subway would be simultaneously reading the most recently released, previously unavailable work of Bulgakov or Solzhenitsyn.

In the (relative) freedom of the Yeltsin and Putin era, that subculture died, and indeed Russian culture seems to have temporarily gone sterile (with a few bright exceptions, such as the novelist Viktor Pelevin). No sane person would want a return of the Soviets, but there is no denying that something moving and beautiful has been lost. I even wonder if a certain kind of creativity flowers best in captivity, like a plant that can only grow in a confined space. And here’s a question for you: As gay people suffer less from isolation and oppression, will they lead less often in creative expression?

I don’t know the anwer to that. What we will find out soon is which aspects of gay culture were entirely a response to oppression and which were genuine and free expressions of a complicated identity. I’m a firm believer that we are about to see a flourishing of gay cultures, plural. Many of them will interact with straight cultures. Our best days, in other words, are yet to come. Even the theocons will be unable to stop that. Freedom is a mighty thing. You can read my essay – and previous ones over the years – here.

Well, it’s a website. Just up. Not exactly a sign of his being about to pack up and go home.

WaPo’s primer on the key players in Plamegate. With the underbrush getting thicker, it’s helpful to have a chart.

Supreme Court Justice, Sandra Day O’Connor, has now weighed in on the Bush policy of allowing abuse and mistreatment of military detainees:

The president and Congress have done little to date to clarify the situation, she said.
However, she cited fundamental national values that the rules should reflect, citing “belief in protecting the basic humanity of all people, including our adversaries. We will not stoop to the atrocities of some of our adversaries.”

Pass the McCain Amendment.

WHAT’S RIGHT WITH KANSAS: A huge victory for sanity and equality in Kansas. We are slowly seeing the impact of Lawrence vs Texas, i.e. that gay people are citizens, not deviants, worthy of equal protection under the law. The ruling can be found here.

I have to say that the conflation of the “civil rights” movement with laws making it harder to sue gun manufacturers seems a little, er, excitable to me.

A telling nugget from a National Journal story:

New York Times reporter Judith Miller told the federal grand jury in the CIA leak case that she might have met with I. Lewis (Scooter) Libby on June 23, 2003 only after prosecutors showed her Secret Service logs that indicated she and Libby had indeed met that day in the Executive Office Building adjacent to the White House, according to attorneys familiar with her testimony.

Well, we already know her memory is dodgy. But I can’t imagine this other amnesiac episode sat well with the Jury.

How does he look so good? He’s had work done, according to Jake Tapper. More here.

The Republicans prepare. I’d say they should be more urgently worried about life after Cheney.