EMAIL OF THE DAY

“I was delighted today by your little plug for Futurama. Like you, I was never a big fan while it was on the air — never really paid much attention, actually. I was far more your standard Simpsons guy and Futurama just didn’t appear have the kind of zany, pop-culture-tweaking humor that I loved about the Simpsons (and whose writing has spiraled shamefully into total irrelevance the last few seasons). Futurama, like early-90’s Simpsons, was genius, and I love it more with every new episode I faithfully TIVO now. Fry and Bender are two of the most delightfully-written characters in TV and the senile malevolence of the Professor is up there as well.”

UNDERMINING THE WAR

If you need further proof that this administration’s abandonment of clear Geneva guidelines has clearly undermined the war, then read this. The use of religion to taunt and torment the enemy has been going on for a long time now. From smearing inmates with fake menstrual blood, to desecrating the Koran, to forcing one Abu Ghraib prisoner to drink alcohol and eat pork, to burning Muslim corpses facing West … we now have a litany of abuses that are objectively evil and almost designed to lose us support among the broad Muslim population. And we have military academies that have been found to be over-run by religious zealots – and a leading general, Boykin, never disciplined for saying that ours is a war of the Christian God versus the Muslim God. When you do not stamp out religious bigotry at its base, when you give it a wink in politics and in warfare, you make these kinds of incidents inevitable. Pass the McCain Amendment.

QUOTE FOR THE DAY

“‘What I saw was a cabal between the vice-president of the United States, Richard Cheney, and the secretary of defence, Donald Rumsfeld, on critical issues that made decisions that the bureaucracy did not know were being made. Now it is paying the consequences of making those decisions in secret but far more telling to me is, America is paying the consequences.’ Mr Wilkerson, [a retired colonel who was chief of staff to Mr Powell until last January], said such secret decision-making was responsible for mistakes such as the long refusal to engage with North Korea or to back European efforts on Iran. It also resulted in bitter battles in the administration among those excluded from the decisions. ‘If you’re not prepared to stop the feuding elements in the bureaucracy as they carry out your decisions, you are courting disaster. And I would say that we have courted disaster in Iraq, in North Korea, in Iran.'” – from the Financial Times today. Cabal? Powell’s top aide – who has distanced himself from Powell, but almost certainly reflectes his own views – also cites the abuse scandal as one of the consequences of the Cheney-Rumsfeld axis:

The detainee abuse at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere was “a concrete example” of the decision-making problem, with the president and other top officials in effect giving the green light to soldiers to abuse detainees. “You don’t have this kind of pervasive attitude out there unless you’ve condoned it.”

Condi is blamed for not intervening. But the president himself is the real man responsible. Now, the question is: what else did this cabal get up to? And is that what Fitzgerald is interested in? Did Fitzgerald talk to Wilkerson? Or Powell? The questions multiply. More here.

CHENEY

The new wrinkle that the source for Rove’s Plame information was originally Libby is another piece of information that arguably points toward Cheney. If Rove learned of it through Libby, then Cheney looks pretty isolated to me as the original source of the leak. Wouldn’t Bush or Hadley tell Rove themselves if they were the orginal sources? Today, we find out the following:

The new information about Hannah signals how broadly the prosecutor has probed for answers. As Cheney’s deputy national security adviser, he was intimately involved in Iraq policy.
Hannah is one of at least five people in the Cheney operation who have been interviewed by federal investigators.
Fitzgerald’s interest in the vice president’s office became clearer as the case continued: Cheney was central to building the case that then-Iraqi President Saddam Hussein sought nuclear weapons-grade material in Niger and Libby helped discredit Wilson in part by talking about his wife, according to lawyers in the case.
Fitzgerald talked to Cheney personally near the beginning of the investigation, though according to a person familiar with the case, he has not questioned him since. Fitzgerald and his investigative team interviewed Mary Matalin, a former top Cheney adviser; Catherine Martin, his former communications adviser; and Jennifer Millerwise, his former spokeswoman.

If the prosecutor asks to interview Cheney again in the next few days, we’re into earthquake territory. Then there’s the question of the July 7 Airforce One flight:

According to people involved in the case, prosecutors believe a printout of that memo [citing Plame’s CIA cover] was in the front of Air Force One during the July 7-12 trip Bush took to Africa, but investigators are unsure who saw it. The prosecutor has also examined the role of Stephen J. Hadley, Bush’s national security adviser. In an e-mail that surfaced earlier this year, Rove told Hadley, then deputy national security adviser, about his conversation with Cooper, saying he waved the reporter off Wilson’s allegations. The e-mail was not turned over until long after the probe began… Fitzgerald has questioned Powell about his knowledge of the document, according to people familiar with the case.

My italics. Who has access to the front of Airforce One? Here’s a plausible scenario. Very few people saw the memo. Cheney was one of them. Did Libby inform Miller and Cooper on his own initiative? Or was he part of a coordinated effort?

Or to put it more succinctly: Condi for Veep?

QUOTE OF THE DAY

“The power of the Executive to cast a man into prison without formulating any charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him the judgement of his peers, is in the highest degree odious and is the foundation of all totalitarian government whether Nazi or Communist,” – Winston Churchill, November 21, 1943, describing what is now legal and constitutional in the United States, under president Bush.