One of the worst ideas in memory:
What kind of dysfunctional thought process would underlie the conclusion that the best way to guarantee the right of non-discrimination (the victims from denial of which are few) is by obliterating the right of privacy (the enjoyers of which are many)? Add to the calculus that "non-discrimination" is strictly a statutory right and that "privacy" is a constitutional right, and the proposal becomes even more absurd.
The Dish 