Quote for the Day

"I must urge the men out there: stay away from Viagra. It is a Pandora’s box of truth. Despite how much you may want to get into Pandora’s box, Viagra will force you to gaze at the hideous reality: men are lousy lovers," – John Hargrave.

Alas, the news is more complex than that. The blue pill can reduce your sperm count as well:

And this is where Pfizer turns a liability into a brand new marketing opportunity, right? Younger fellas, who don’t want to have kids, may now think of Viagra as not just a party drug, but a form of birth control …

Embassies as Bunkers

The security issue has led to a strange role for American embassies across the globe:

In reality, American embassies are increasingly cut off from those very countries in which the U.S. is supposed to be fostering better relations, and worse, create caricatures of the detached diplomat more interested in tennis than work. Even in Doha, a relative safe haven from terrorism, the embassy is many meters off the main road, and to enter, you pass through a security checkpoint staffed by Filipinos. Depending on your business at the embassy, you then go through another layer of security to enter the building. Even for embassy employees, entering the building was time consuming. For foreigners, it could be a good chunk of the afternoon.

There’s a loss here:

I grew up in South America so I’ve had experience with the US consular system. When I was a kid, sure, there were Marine guards in bullet-proof guard huts checking you out, but in effect, you could walk in off the street. What happens to the point of an embassy or consulate if the locals can’t get in at all, and the consular staff lives apart from and has no interaction with the locals?

The Last Straw, Etc.

A reader writes:

The reader you posted stated that Noonan and others who are late to the party have no credibility to criticize Bush. Hogwash. Have you and this reader never heard of the expression "the straw that breaks the camel’s back?" You maintain loyalty in politics even when you are in disagreement with a party or a President. If you are part of a political movement you realize that no politician is ideologically pure or completely without fault.  However, you do expect that your loyalty will be rewarded with more than mere lip service to one’s ideological beliefs and you expect more than comically bad incompetence.

A lot of intellectual conservatives are now asking themselves at which moment did they lose faith in Bush.  For some, such as yourself, it was Abu Ghraib.  For others, it was the chaos that unfolded in late 2003-04 and the intransigent refusal of Rumsfeld and Bush to respond to it.

For another group, it was the President’s use of warrantless wiretaps and vast expansions of federal power.  For many it was the realization that two of the three biggest domestic accomplishments for Bush (outside of the tax cuts) were Ted Kennedy sponsored pieces of legislation.  For a huge number it was the culture of profligate spending.

For myself, the seminal moment at which I lost real faith in this President was in the aftermath of Katrina.  He could no longer profess to hold the mantle of competence and indeed, he was the poster child of cronyism and ineffectiveness.  He proved himself to be dilatory and disinterested, all in the face of the worst natural disaster in this country’s history.  Granted the local politicians screwed up royally (and are still doing so in NOLA), but he is the POTUS and is expected, at the least to focus our efforts to recover, and to lead.  He held that mantle after 9/11, he pissed it down the drain after Katrina.

The last straws for conservatives are the White House’s arrogant refusal to contenance any criticism of what it is doing in Iraq coupled with its arrogant and condescending ramroding of a disastrous immigration boondoggle, all the while telling the people "who have carried his water for years" that they are a bunch of bigots and ignoramuses. 

Don’t forget Andrew that the scales had to fall from your eyes as well.  It has come at different times and in different ways for all of us, but it does not make Noonan’s critique of Bush any less credible that it has come later than your own.  It just means that you were more foresighted than she was.   

Accountability and the Right

Rod Dreher is unimpressed by recent epiphanies:

So yes, by all means let’s turn our backs on this failed presidency, and save what we can, while we can. But let’s not kid ourselves: Bush has failed conservatives, yes, but we have also failed ourselves. It doesn’t take much courage to stand up for conservative principle to a president as weak as this one has become. It would have taken real courage to stand up for conservative principle in 2002, 2003, 2004, even early 2005. How many did? I know I didn’t — not until Katrina and Miers, which came late in 2005.

If we’re looking to blame someone for the failure of Republican government and the conservative crack-up, look to the White House, yes, and look to the late, unlamented Republican Congress. But also look to the conservative talk show hosts, the conservative columnists, and finally, in the mirror. The only way we’re going to rebuild after the present and coming political shattering is through honest reckoning, and taking responsibility for what we’ve done. It is tempting to blame Bush for everything. But it’s not fair, and it’s not honest. Bush is today who he always was. The difference is we conservatives pretty much loved the guy – when he was a winner."

Carpe Diem

Every day in America is a special day. No, this isn’t an excerpt from a Romney speech. That would be:

"Fabulous. America. Faith. Faith. Faith. America. God. Faith. Gosh. God. Fabulous. America. Great. America. Strong. Strong. Faith. Strong. Family. God. Faith. America. Strong. Fabulous. Tagg!"

It’s a statement of fact, as Melissa Lafsky notes. Today, June 1, is, for example, Pen Pal Day, Kentucky Statehood Day and Leave The Office Early Day. Hey, where do you think you’re going?

Reason, Left and Right

Mark Hoofnagle notes:

It’s important to remember both the left and the right have anti-scientific tendencies, the left’s just tend to be less religious, less world-threatening and more woo-based. My brother recently told me about moving to California, "they don’t believe in Jesus here, just bullshit" in reference to the woo-based beliefs of large portions of the population. The risk of unscientific tendencies is when people with potential to become cranks see a scientific theory as a threat to some overvalued idea they hold dear. Sometimes the over-valued idea isn’t even a bad quality, it can be compassion – but taken to an extreme. If the left starts to see global warming policy as a money-grab by the elites, expect to see more left wing crankery and climate denial based on conspiratorial beliefs about carbon markets.

Just stick to the data, as best you can. I prefer hoo with my woo, personally.