Against Happiness

Yellowdaisies

"Suffering the gloom, inevitable as breath, we must further accept this fact that the world hates: We are forever incomplete, fragments of some ungraspable whole. Our unfinished natures — we are never pure actualities but always vague potentials — make life a constant struggle, a bout with the persistent unknown. But this extension into the abyss is also our salvation. To be only a fragment is always to strive for something beyond ourselves, something transcendent. That striving is always an act of freedom, of choosing one road instead of another. Though this labor is arduous — it requires constant attention to our mysterious and shifting interiors — it is also ecstatic, an almost infinite sounding of the exquisite riddles of Being.

To be against happiness is to embrace ecstasy. Incompleteness is a call to life. Fragmentation is freedom. The exhilaration of never knowing anything fully is that you can perpetually imagine sublimities beyond reason. On the margins of the known is the agile edge of existence. This is the rapture, burning slow, of finishing a book that can never be completed, a flawed and conflicted text, vexed as twilight," – Eric G. Wilson, author of "Against Happiness: In Praise of Melancholy."

Hat tip: Tyler Cowen.

The Junta Moves

Burma’s military dictators cut off their people from outside news the old-fashioned way:

The license fee [for TV satellite dishes] has rocketed from $5 to $800 – an unaffordable sum to most people in Burma. It is equivalent to about three times the annual salary of a public school teacher. The new fee was imposed without warning and discovered by residents who went to renew their licenses Wednesday.

Most middle class homes and shops use satellite dishes to tune into foreign sports events, soap operas and to circumvent the junta’s tightly controlled state media. "The government is trying to shut our ears and eyes," said Thant Zin, a 57-year-old civil servant. "The military regime does not want us to know the truth about our country."

Electability

Dept of the Bleeding Obvious, courtesy of Jon Chait. He has a nice point about Republicans and McCain. But it looks as if, once again, the Republicans will rescue victory from the pit of doom and overcome their own issues and the Democrats will throw away their most compelling candidate since Kennedy to protect a dynasty’s prerogatives. Hey, it’s not my party.

Attention Adam Bellow

Someone has a book proposal:

I’m planning on writing a book called "Conservative Communism: The Collectivist Temptation from Mao Zedong to the Hoover Institute". Basically, the premise of the book is that even though people think that Communism is a phenomenon of the Left, it should be obvious to any serious scholar that Communists have more in common with today’s conservatives than they do today’s progressives. I mean, Lenin outlawed prostitution, and Focus on the Family wants to keep prostitution outlawed. Mao thought all businesses should be supported by the government, and modern conservatives think that the government should avoid taxing businesses and give them all kinds of grants and free money. You can see that they’re basically the same thing.

The Classic Clinton Push-Back

All criticism of Bill is a "right-wing talking point" – that’s Howard Wolfson. Ah, yes. Takes me back. The classic Clinton pivot. Any criticism of us is grist for the far right. Then this:

Pressed on whether there were any point at which Bill’s conduct would come to be seen by the campaign as a liability, and asked if there was any campaign discussion of this possibility, Wolfson replied. "A few more liabilities like New Hampshire and Nevada, and we’ll win the nomination," he said.

Mark Steyn is onto something:

I love the way all these worldly Democratic sophisticates – the ones who told us "everybody does it" – sound so sweetly naive at discovering that this time round "everybody" has done it to them. Better get used to a lot more of that.

Yeah, they’d better.