Marc makes a fair point:
As an amateur observer of human social behavior, I am quite impressed by the steel wall of aversion that some Obama supporters put up whenever they’re confronted by something that does not fit with their established perception of Hillary Clinton — namely that there is just NO way that Hillary can raise that much money in such a short period of time…because she is, well, Hillary. The fundamental attribution error is at work: it must be a lie because Hillary is a liar; the situation — a 9 point victory in Pennsylvania, or the roughly half of the Democratic electorate who supporters her — well, it matters much less.
In general with the Clintons, however, it is safe to assume that what they say is a lie until proven otherwise.
The Dish 