William Galston proposes one way to improve conventions:
The public always claims to be hungry for user-friendly information about what candidates and parties stand for … so, why don’t we allocate primetime slots at each convention to a reasonably detailed presentation of the party platform? Immediately afterward, the networks would feature panels of experts discussing the basis, significance, and feasibility of its principal proposals. Not only could this proposal help create a somewhat better informed electorate, but it would also force the parties to take their platforms more seriously. Concessions to organized interests now made in coded language that few notice or understand could be exposed to national scrutiny, and historically informed commentators could highlight subtle but significant shifts in long-held positions.
I think that’s a convention only Bill Galston would enjoy.
The Dish 