Beards Are Back?!

Thomas Hine says so:

Shag rugs are back in the stores. The rooms in decorating magazines are starting to look just a little bit cluttered. Solar panels are hot. Men are wearing beards. There are orange cars on the road, something not seen since the days of the flaming Ford Pinto. For all we know, avocado-colored appliances are about to mount a comeback.

The culture seems to be having a 1970s moment.

The Cannabis Closet: The Parents

A reader writes:

As a kid, I discovered at a young-ish age that my parents smoked pot. They never did it in front of me, but curious child that I was, I snooped around and found out on my own. I was devastated because, as an 8-year-old kid, all the propaganda told me that pot was akin to murder (“I learned it 662px-Macro_cannabis_bud by watching YOU!”). It was awful for me to find out that my parents were criminals!

As I got older into my teenage years, I got into the weed a bit too; but I still held this grudge against my parents. My mindset was that I was SUPPOSED to do it, I was a rebellious teenager. They should have grown out of it long ago.

Funny thing is, they weren’t criminals. They were the most loving, caring, adoring parents I ever could have asked for. They sacrificed a lot to give me and my brother private educations through high school. He and I never could have asked for anything more. Now that I’m my own fully-functional adult with a great job, a wonderful boyfriend, and a hell of a lot of stability, I look back and wish that I didn’t spend my childhood thinking these things about my parents. I’m old enough to know now that pot ? criminal loserdom. I hope that one day, the stigma is lifted so it can just be “something that grownups do” and kids will accept that as a fine answer.

Another writes:

I grew up in a house where my Dad smoked pot in front of me on an almost daily basis. When I was little I didn’t really think to question what he was smoking (he was a cigarette smoker too, and had the occasional cigar). One day when I was in sixth grade, he was going to work late and was going to drop me off at school. Before we left he called me over and explained to me that stuff he was smoking wasn’t always cigarettes, it was marijuana.

I remember being a little shocked at the time thinking, “Wow, my dad smokes pot.” He had a talk with me about how I was getting older now and that even though I would come across this stuff sooner or later, I wasn’t old enough to make a responsible decision as to whether I would choose to smoke pot (obviously he was right; I was only 11 at the time). He just told me to wait until I got out of high school to try it (as Chef says, “There’s a time and place for everything and it’s college”).

Of course I had many many opportunities growing up to smoke pot if I really wanted to. I could have taken a some of my Dad’s and he probably wouldn’t have known any better. But I respected his wishes and waited until I got into college. I’ve smoked pot about a dozen times or so and to be honest I did enjoy it. But I haven’t smoked at all since I graduated from college in 2004.

I’ll always appreciate that my Dad treated me as an adult when it came to the subject of pot. He didn’t try to hide it from me. He wasn’t a hypocrite like so many today who live by the motto, “Do as I say, not as I do.”

Another:

My teenage kids understand that I have smoked grass, and that the drug was ubiquitous when I was growing up, so pretty much unavoidable. I’ve explained to them that early on I realized that I would not excel in school if I smoked more than once or twice a month. I don’t talk about current use, because I think this is something that should be kept private, especially considering the current legal situation and existing social morays. I don’t think this makes me a hypocrite. For the most part, I’m very honest with my kids, and I don’t think there is a parent on the planet that is completely open about everything they might have done in the past.

Another:

I haven’t played the game of telling my kids that drugs are bad. Like almost everyone in my generation (I’m 53) I have a certain amount of experience with drugs. When my daughters were getting close to the age when they would come into contact with drugs, I shared my experiences honestly and told them that I hoped that they would make sensible, safe decisions. I didn’t tell them to abstain, I told them to be careful. I also asked them to be open with me and keep me informed, which for the most part they did. That enabled me to advise them about how to stay safe.

Whether or not you feel like you can safely come out of this particular closet, you should at least be honest with your kids. If we can’t manage that, we’ll never win this battle and our kids will end up stuck in the same closet. Incidentally, almost all of my friends are in the closet. I’m not, but only because I started to have a powerful negative psychic reaction to marijuana in my 40s, sort of like the stoned paranoia thing, which ruins it for me. I miss it.

Another:

I’m 51. I smoked pot several times a week from the time I was sixteen until I was about 30. I quit for about 10 years when my kids were young and started smoking again about 10 years ago. I’ve never smoked a cigarette in my life and rarely drink. My kids are now in college and I smoke more frequently now that they are not home.

I have told both of them that I’ve “inhaled” and they in turn have told me they have, too. We have not had a family inhalation. Both of my daughters asked me if their mother, whom I am happily married to for 25 years, has also smoked. I told them that if they really want to know they should ask her. While I’m increasingly out of the cannabis closet, I’m not going to out anybody else.

It is strange for me to write this, but I’m really a model citizen. I work productively at the small business I started 8 years ago (I was high when I wrote the business plan), pay taxes, support my children, contribute to charity, and obey the law. I haven’t had so much as a traffic ticket in 15 years. I believe very strongly in the rule of law, but the pot laws in America are so out of touch with reality that I simply ignore them.

The Johnston-Palin War

It’s heating up. Governor Palin has point-blank denied that Levi ever lived with the Palins. The Palins are saying he merely “stayed there” for two months. Levi and his sister Mercede have now called the Palins liars, and suggest that they are being called “white trash.” This was after Palin’s spokesperson trashed the teenaged father of her grandson thus:

“Bristol did not even know Levi was going on the show. We’re disappointed that Levi and his family, in a quest for fame, attention, and fortune, are engaging in flat-out lies, gross exaggeration, and even distortion of their relationship,” says the statement from the Palin family rep, Meghan Stapleton. “Bristol’s focus will remain on raising Tripp, completing her education, and advocating abstinence,” the statement continues. “It is unfortunate that Levi finds it more appealing to exploit his previous relationship with Bristol than to contribute to the well being of the child.”

The statement ends, saying, “Bristol realizes now that she made a mistake in her relationship and is the one taking responsibility for their actions.”

The CBS morning interview:

Watch CBS Videos Online

For some reason, Mercede also provided one photograph of Levi apparently tenderly cradling a baby that looks a great deal like Trig, the offspring of his girlfriend’s mother, for the Tyra Banks show appearance. If I were Sarah Palin, I’d wind down this family spat as soon as possible, wouldn’t you?

The Red Cross Torture Report

You can download it here. It is the most damning and credible indictment of the American government to appear in years – more damning because it was prepared in the usual secrecy and not intended as a public document; more damning because it comes not from Jane Mayer or Mark Danner or Dana Priest or this blog, but from the most credible and respected human rights watchdog in the world: the International Committee for the Red Cross. It is broad, meticulous evidence of pre-meditated, illegal, and immoral war crimes that were then subject to cover-up and lies at the highest levels. It makes Nixon's crimes look petty. You no longer have any excuse to look away or move on.

Either America deals with this or it does not. It is a test of character and integrity for the country and for the political elite. It is a test for the new president.

Conservative Kamikazes

Robert Stacy McCain calls the anti-marriage stance a "hill [for Republicans] to die on." His reasoning:

Nothing succeeds like success and nothing fails like failure. Ergo, to defeat the radicals in their latest crusade (whatever the crusade may be) is to demoralize and weaken their side, and to embolden and encourage our side. Even to fight and lose is better than conceding without a fight because, after all, give 'em an inch and they'll take a mile.

But let us contemplate his metaphor: "a hill to die on."

Since February 2007

John Sifton notes a vital fact about the devastating International Red Cross report, ending any empirical doubt that the last president was a war criminal:

Note in particular the report’s date, February 14, 2007—Valentine’s Day. On that date, the U.S. government was put on notice about the allegations of CIA torture. (The ICRC also wrote to the U.S. governments about the issue of disappearances at several points in 2003-2006.)

Under international law—the Geneva Conventions, the Convention against Torture, and basic precepts of customary international law—the United States has a positive obligation to investigate and prosecute persons alleged to have committed torture and other violations of the laws of war. As of Valentine’s Day 2007, and possibly earlier, the U.S. government was obligated to investigate and prosecute the abuses detailed in the report. The United States’ failure to do so is a recurring breach of international law.

The refusal to investigate serious Red Cross allegations of unequivocal torture by the US government is itself a breach of the Geneva Conventions. Which means to say that the president has no neutral ground on which to stand in order to ignore or move on from the war crimes he inherited. If Obama does not at a minimum release all the relevant documents regarding the torture program of his predecessors, he will be an accomplice to it. This really is a place where there can be no middle ground if the US is to remain in Geneva and under the rule of law.