Hook-Ups With GPS

Dreher finds Grindr dehumanizing:

No doubt there will be a heterosexual version of Grindr out soon (the website AshleyMadison.com already exists to connect married people who want to have an extramarital fling), and straights who want to find out who's sexually available can arrange impromptu hook-ups with little fuss. My guess is that most people, after a certain age, will find this sort of thing gross. But let's say there were a Grindr-type app for heteros (or, for that matter, if gay teens put Grindr on their iPhones): does anybody doubt that teenage boys would think of this thing as the greatest thing since the invention of cars? Seriously, it would dramatically lower the barriers to entry into the world of active sexuality, because the jumpy teenager wouldn't have to work up the nerve to talk to potential partners to find out if they are even available.

Well, there ain't nothing anyone can do about it even if they tried. This kind of technology is unstoppable.

Cut The Fat, Ctd

A reader writes:

Campos is off-base. If changes in diet and exercise have benefits even if there is no weight loss, is that an argument against trying to achieve weight loss? Of course not.

One of the studies he cites about interventions to achieve weight loss clearly documented that the children did not decrease caloric intake. Is it a surprise that they did not lose weight? The increase in obesity rates is leveling off. So obesity is not a problem? Weight nomograms are arbitrary? No kidding, it is a nomogram. The issue is that more children are now overweight/obese by those nomograms than they were 20-30 years ago.

I have cared for multiple obese 19-25 year olds with type-2 diabetes and BMIs > 45. My gray-haired attendings at the county hospital where I trained used to say they had never seen that many before. The data back that up. Remember that even if these obese patients do not develop type-2 diabetes during their childhood, fat children usually grow up into fat adults … who then get diabetes (there are data to support that). Walk through any medical ICU and count the percentage of patients with outright obesity, or extreme obesity. It is a stunning exercise. Especially when you consider that some of the thin patients are thin due to their underlying disease (cancer, cardiac cachexia).

Campos’ hobbyhorse is pushing back against the anti-obesity crowd. Skepticism is good, and some pushback against “crisis” thinking and panic is probably a good idea. But the case for picking on the Obama’s effort reduce childhood obesity – as if teaching good health habits is going to cause eating disorders and make people feel bad – is just weak.

What Went Wrong?

Juan Cole reflects on 22 Bahman:

One of the problems for the opposition is that it has essentially been mounting 'flashmobs'— fairly spontaneous demonstrations organized by email and Facebook. The regime closed down most electronic communication earlier this week, foiling the tactic.

It may also be that Ahmadinejad's ploy of foregrounding the Iranian nuclear enrichment program and the denunciations that drew from the Western powers has gotten the Iranian public's back up and made them more nationalistic, so that they are swinging behind the regime against what they see as imperial oppressors.

Gay Couples Gain Ground

The latest poll reveals that public opinion remains equally divided on the question of marriage equality. The shift from last year remains within the margin of error, and the basic balance is 50-50. Last year, it was 49 – 46 in favor; this year it's 50 – 47 against. I suppose some will argue that that's a turning of the tide, but it seems a trivial difference to me.

But the big news is that the debate over marriage has made a big difference on the debate about civil unions. A whopping 2 – 1 majority now favors civil unions for gay couples, defined in the poll as "giving them the legal rights of married couples in areas such as health insurance, inheritance and pension coverage?" That includes surprisingly big jumps among self-described conservatives: 

Support for such arrangements is now 15 points higher than it was a few years ago among conservatives; it's up 13 points among Republicans.

Meghan and Cindy McCain are more in touch with reality than John McCain. On ending the military ban on openly gay soldiers, the public overwhelmingly favors it, by 75 to 24 percent.

The other factor, however, is intensity of opinion, where the opposition is very intense. Those strongly in favor make up 31 percent; those strongly against 42 percent.

Two other notable nuggets. For those under 30, 65 percent favor marriage equality, a big jump from the last ABC poll, and the first time that number has exceeded 50 percent. And Independents are far, far closer to Democrats than Republicans on this issue. That suggests to me that this is becoming a liability for Republicans. They cannot avoid the issue since their base is so passionate about it, but in a general election, any emphasis on it will alienate a lot of Independents.

All I can say is that when we began this campaign in earnest two dacdes ago, I would have rubbed my eyes in disbelief at these numbers. I can't believe how far we've some, and I hope soon we will be able to stop arguing about it altogether and get on with our lives as equals.

Palin’s Only Trick, Ctd

Frum says that Julian and I are wrong:

[A]ll this presupposes that the Obama administration wants Sarah Palin to go away. It does not. Palin is Obama’s preferred opponent. What is good for Palin is good for Obama. Of course the White House builds her up, of course it seems to play into Palin’s ink-stained hands! The White House is counting on those hands to deliver them in turn an easy romp to re-election.