Month: May 2010

The Legacy Of 24, Ctd

A reader writes:

As much as 24 has come to represent the torture-happy (or at least torture-supporting) segment of America, the interesting thing is that the show didn't start that way.  In the first seasons of 24, torture was a hotly debated issue among the characters that was agonized over by everyone involved.  Weeks would go by where the characters would debate the decisions that they had to make regarding torture or the rule of law.  Even Jack Bauer himself did everything he could to try to maintain his own soul.

However as the show progressed, torture became normalized and required, and standard legal requirements were treated as troublesome hurdles.

The fictional agency of CTU had an expert in causing severe pain without causing lasting damage on staff that routinely was called in, even in cases where those suspects turned out to be innocent, and nobody batted an eye.  Jack was often put in situations where he had to interrogate suspects on the spot and it was taken for granted those suspects wouldn't talk unless tortured.  Jack went from harsh threats, to actual torture, to shooting a suspect's wife in the leg to get him to answer.

I'm not sure what exactly to take away from this progression.  Partly, it came from the show's need to one-up itself in order to stay relevant.  The moral decisions and actions in the show had to become more shocking, and the show's need to act in an accelerated timeframe with enormous stakes meant that it acted entirely in the fever dreams of the far right.  But mostly, the show's support of torture came from a reflection of society.  Torture was no longer shocking to us – torture, inhumane treatment, and a disregard of legal norms in any situations related to terrorism are all accepted now, or at least treated as a valid point of view.

24 might share some guilt as the show that presented the pro-torture point of view in the best possible light and in the most extreme, clear-cut, and thus unrealistic scenarios.  But I don't think it acted alone.  There's a reason it was as popular as it was.  Just as the popularity of Glenn Beck or Sarah Palin represent America as much as they represent themselves, 24 is an accurate reflection of the times and views of much of America after 9/11.

Along those lines, this unembeddable Youtube from Human Rights First is a must see.

The Sexually Ambiguous, Swimming Pig, Ctd

A reader writes:

You are right about the protuberant nipples.  I grew up on a small family hog farm.  Nipples on a pig are not an indication of sex, especially if it is a young male pig deprived at an early age of his – ahem – manhood, which I presume Ralph to be.  Hence, the term my dad always used:  “Worthless as teats on a boar hog.”

The more important indicator of Ralph’s true sexuality can be seen between his worthless nipples about three-quarters of the way back toward his hindquarters.  He is quite elongated in that postcard shot but I think I can just make out the only thing visible in that picture (and most likely, the only thing visible on poor emasculated Ralph) which determines that Ralph, is, actually a Ralph. Odd that in the Hallmark Goo post, even that has been erased.  Poor Ralphie.

Clegg, Britain’s First Vice President

Massie outlines Clegg's duties:

The single most important thing in this government is the relationship – and level of trust – between Cameron and Clegg … Clegg's role, in some ways, might be compared to that of a ship's Master. Yes, the Captain is in command of everything and has the final say but he depends heavily upon the Master to ensure that the ship sails properly and reaches its rightful destination. On a huge range of issues, then, Clegg is likely to be responsible for ensuring that agreements are met, policy co-ordinated and everyone kept happy. That's actually a pretty hefty job.

And how would that differ from the role Brown performed for Blair for so long? I guess the answer is that Clegg is likely to be more loyal.