A Decade Of The Dish: Your Reflections II

A reader writes:

It seems the only time I ever see you is when I’m five sheets to the wind at the Diner.  So I figured that I would take an e-opportunity to congratulate you on your 10th anniversary.  Your blog, and books, were vitally important for this young, conservative Catholic political junkie as I was coming out of the closet.  And after you helped me through that, I became a religious reader of your blog and seemingly together you and I came to realize the excesses of this current brand of conservatism. I imagine I'll look back on that period and determine that it was the most important formative part of my adult life, and you and the Dish played a critical role.  I’m eternally grateful for that.

Another writes:

Congratulations on your 10th year of the Dish.  I write simply to thank you for helping impact who I am as a person, as a thinker, and as a (hopefully) productive member of society.

I am 28 years old.  When I was in my second or third year of college (around year 2 or 3 of the Dish's existence), attending the Maxwell School of Citizenship at Syracuse University and studying Political Science, I found your voice on the internet and have been addicted ever since. I was going through my first period of real intellectual reflection at the time, having entered college as a fervent, yet poorly informed, conservative.  Having grown up in an entirely homogenous rural-conservative community, it took a few years in a more diverse environment for my ideas about the world to be sufficiently challenged to a degree where I could question my own beliefs.  I was beginning to accept gays as friends – a thought abhorrent to me when I left home.  I was beginning to question dogmatic Republican principles, a thought that remains abhorrent to many of the people I grew up with. 

It has felt ever since that I have grown with the Dish in learning how to become a fluid thinker – constantly questioning my own views and opinions as the world continually challenges them with new facts and circumstances.

Another:

Most importantly, you've taught me a valuable lesson is disagreeing with someone. I assumed there were two choices: Republican or Democrat. The Democrats were the liberals, the good guys; Republicans were conservatives, the villains (I'm a child of the GW Bush years).  But you've helped me to realize that the tags liberal and conservative have almost no bearing to either the Democrats or Republicans these days. I could see myself proudly identifying as a conservative someday (but as long as the Republican party stays in its same mold, I will never identify as such).

Another:

I'm sure I would never consider myself a conservative if not for you and the Dish. I came of political age in the US and in the Bush era, when 'conservatism' meant what it means now: neoconservatism, fiscal recklessness and social nostalgia. If anything can push a sensible person away from the label 'conservative' it's that. But now whenever someone talks to me about politics, I say, a little apologetically, that I'm a conservative. Usually I'm able to explain it in a way they can understand. And that's all your doing.

Another:

I really wish there were more like you out there to read, but I’ve had some bad experiences trying to read other conservative bloggers.  I come away nauseous, not contemplative.  Although I’m still quite liberal, I do appreciate real conservatism, if for no other reason than as a necessary part of a balance. I know that pendulums really shouldn’t swing too far in either direction!  I suppose I respect real conservatives if I believe they are sincerely motivated by a desire to achieve good things for all (not just themselves).  I really do trust you, and that is saying quite a bit.

I am also the daughter of a Southern Baptist Minister and struggle painfully with faith to this day because of the things that I was immersed (literally) in about religion that I found to be just… well… wrong.  So I’ve loved the elements of your faith that you have shared with us.  One of my favorites is “When Not Seeing is Believing”, and it touched me deeply.  And I consider your coining of the term ‘Christianist’ to be spot on.

Another:

As a Catholic who has serious issues with Benedict's papacy and the politicization of the church in general, I also drew inspiration from the Dish's weekly focus on all things religious and spiritual, the debate with Sam Harris, and the difficulty of remaining within an institution that can simultaneously sear and salvage one's soul.

Another:

This Muslim is always appreciative of your dedication to the truth and your understanding of the fact that not all of us are homophobic, homicidal or just plain nuts! We are capable of poking fun at ourselves, understanding that the future of our religion lies not in the narrow dogma of the past 100 years or so, but in accepting that we live in a beautiful and diverse world that our Creator has provided for all of creation, not a select few. Your spirituality is astoundingly passionate, rather reminds me of my own understanding of Islam. The piety and reverence with which you address the deeply troubling issues confronting the Catholic Church resonate with those of us who seek change and reform within our own religions.

Thank you for provoking my thoughts (and those of my friends!) and earning the gadfly status in my life!

Toast Or Roast: Adam Ozimek

Ozimek toasts:

Andrew Sullivan, Patrick Appel, Chris Bodenner, Conor Friedersdorf, and Zoe Pollock are celebrating the 10th anniversary of The Daily Dish, and I just wanted to say a quick congratulations and thank all of them, and especially Andrew, for so many years of great blogging. I am a fickle blog reader, and there are few blogs I always read, but the Dish is one of them.

Some of my favorite moments are back and forth between Andrew and Sam Harris, and of course his tireless coverage of Sarah Palin and the Green Revolution in Iran. These  last two highlighted what I think is one of the Dish’s greatest values, which is the creative ways they democratize blogging by providing a voice to their readers and highlighting the interesting ideas of other bloggers; being a good listener is a rare skill in the blogosphere.

More than anything else I read the Dish because it feels like an earnest and thoughtful debate. I would be remiss not to thank them for linking to us here at Modeled Behavior and making us part of that debate, which for me has been one of the biggest thrills of blogging. 

Read Adam at Modeled Behavior.

Toast Or Roast: James Joyner

Joyner toasts and roasts:

Andrew has some hobby horses that annoy the bejesus out of me, most notably the bizarre Trig Palin conspiracy theory that he won’t let go of.   But the obsessiveness that makes that happen is what fuels one of the few truly indispensable blogs out there.   He’s simultaneously ridiculously cynical and hopelessly romantic.

Read James at Outside The Beltway.

Toast Or Roast: Eli Sanders


People may not remember, because it was a million blog years ago that this happened. But in December of 2007, Andrew Sullivan—wrong on one or two things in his time (ahem, Iraq War), but not wrong on this one—wrote the single best rationale for electing President Barack Hussein Obama that had been seen up to that point (or has been seen since). Re-read "Why Obama Matters" and you see Sullivan at his best: prescient, persuasive, and just fucking correct. Plus… savvy enough to give himself future wiggle room! As he wrote in December 2007: "None of this, of course, means that Obama will be the president some are dreaming of." As it turns out: Also true!

Cheers, Sullivan!

Read Eli at The Stranger.

Toast Or Roast: Scott Horton


For ten years the Daily Dish has shown us the full potential of the blog as a medium. Sometimes a heated argument, occasionally infuriating, at times the sort of intellectual tour de force that might otherwise only be found in the dialogue of a Woody Allen movie, always with art, music and short videos that revolt, fascinate and at times inspire. This experiment has matured and developed over time and at present the Daily Dish's focal position in the blog world is largely due to its ability to grow, fill the gaps in the Internet world and attract new readers. The Internet would be a pale place without it.

Congratulations, but don't rest on your laurels!

Read Scott at No Comment.

Toast Or Roast: The Buzzfeed Editors


For many of us on the editorial team at BuzzFeed, where keyboard-playing cats and drug-addled rainbow enthusiasts rule the day, reading Andrew Sullivan is our "Mental Health Break." For as long as we've been around, The Daily Dish has been a resource for news, a constant source of entertainment, and a place that we return to again and again for insight and real honesty after we've spent a little bit too long digging up the "Top 100 Most Insanely Disturbing Tea Party Slogans" (or something equivalently depressing) and have forgotten how to see the forest for the trees. We'll still be reading Andrew 10 years from now, even if he's come full circle again politically.

Read BF here.

Toast Or Roast: Marc Ambinder


If you turned off the TV, unsubscribed from every RSS feed, Shanghaied the New York Times, Gazelled the satellite radio and as your only engagement with the world you read the Dish each day, you'll know more about life, the planet, the vital debates of our time — and about Andrew — than 99 percent of your wired, weary friends. If I could find a way to attach that intelligence to my brain, I would.

Read Marc at the Atlantic.com.

Toast Or Roast: Reader T.H.


As a somewhat regular reader for over nearly ten years, I can attest to the evolving look, nature and political philosophy of The Daily Dish. Its initial years were characterized by a strong conservative bent that has evolved in more recent years to what might be described as a mix of the philosophies of Chairman Mao and Ho Chi Minh…but with a dash of the good old Burkean spirit.

Some of the newer "features" of the Dish required some adjustment to at least this reader's point of view. For example, the new Dish seemed to contain a lot of posts having to do with "Bears." Because of the somewhat pseudo-sexual nature of the posts, I initially, interpreted this as a sign that Andrew had also evolved, in this case away from an attraction to one subset of Homo sapiens to some form of bestiality. Fortunately, it soon became clear that "Bears" merely referred to overweight, aging and hirsute men!

In any event, whatever the philosophy and look of The Daily Dish, I am confident that it will continue to arouse the passions and hold the interest of its readers for many years to come. Congratulations on completing the first ten years!

For a far more indicative look at T.H.'s daily denouncements, read here. Money quote:

Your initial post and your response to this reader represent a new low in your dementia-infested mind.