Jonathan Bernstein responds in detail.
Month: December 2010
Obama’s Next Gambit
Drum agonizes:
During the lame duck session, a continuing public dedication to bipartisanship might make sense because there may still be a few bills that he can pass with just a few Republican votes. And it's easier to get those votes if he's not out in the Rose Garden every day telling the world that Republicans are all obstructionist assholes.
But — starting next year that won't be true anymore.
Republicans will control the House, and in the Senate it will take a significant chunk of the GOP caucus to get anything passed. Sweet talking Olympia Snowe will no longer even arguably be a viable strategy. Obama's only hope is to draw dramatic contrasts with Republican orthodoxy, call them out relentlessly on their obstructionism and corporate obeisance, and try to rally public opinion to his side. It might not work, but there's no better alternative.
My view is that this will only work if Obama outflanks the GOP on long-term debt-reduction. He needs to make it the signature reform of his last two years just as health insurance reform was the lodestar of his first two. And they are bookends – united by being tough, difficult questions which need addressing now by a president who can use his bully pulpit to insist on long-term debt reduction in the next two years. When he has more concrete plans for this than the GOP, the tea party heads will explode.
The Right vs Palin II
Ed Rollins, who worked in the Reagan administration, isn't a fan of the former half-term governor from Alaska:
Ms. Palin, serious stuff needs to be accomplished in Washington.
If you want to be a player, go to school and learn the issues. Put smart people around you and listen to them. If you want to be taken seriously, be serious. You’ve already got your own forum. If you want to be a serious presidential candidate, get to work. If you want to be an imitator of Ronald Reagan, go learn something about him and respect his legacy.
If you want to be a gadfly, just keep doing what you’re doing.
The Arabs vs Iran? Please. Ctd
Commercial ties between Dubai and Iran are significant (Dubai is Iran’s largest non-oil trading partner), and as a result the UAEG walks a fine line between maintaining and encouraging this trade and working to prevent suspected Iranian proliferation activities. Although the UAEG is worried about Iran’s nuclear ambitions, its short-term policy decisions regarding Iran center on not provoking its neighbor.
Larison adds:
It still seems true that advocates of attacking Iran have been exaggerating the extent of support for this among our Gulf state allies. The leaked cables confirm that they are not simply making this up out of thin air, which is something of an achievement given the lousy track record of some hawks when it comes to making claims about foreign affairs. None of this changes the reality that “pro-Israel” hawks and the Israeli government remain the dominant forces pushing a confrontational U.S. policy towards Iran. The report that some Arab governments agree with this reckless, disastrous course of action isn’t really news, and it doesn’t make military action against Iran any less harmful to the entire region.
What is odd is the new concern for the fears and concerns of Arab governments from people who have spent the better part of the last decade deliberately ignoring or in some cases actively opposing the interests of those governments.
Quote For The Day II
"People Hate Kim Kardashian's Tweets More Than AIDS," – Max Read, Gawker.
Pawlenty’s Willie Horton?
Kos smells blood. Between Pawlenty's clemency for an incestuous sex offender and Huckabee's pardon of a cop-killer and Romney's pioneering of Obamacare on a state level, you begin to see why Palin is still such a strong contender. They are all halibut awaiting their stoning.
Hetero Civil Unions?
Dale Carpenter reads Illinois’ new civil unions bill:
There are a couple of noteworthy provisions in the bill. First, the new status is available to opposite-sex spouses who choose not to marry. This makes the Illinois law different from other civil-union laws, like the ones in California, Oregon, and New Jersey, which generally make the equivalent status available only to same-sex couples on the theory that opposite-sex couples can marry.
Which means to say it offers marriage-lite, undermining heterosexual marriage in a far more profound way than marriage equality ever would.
The DADT Hearings, Day One
So far, pretty much a wipe-out for the arguments against repeal. But losing the argument often makes McCain dig deeper in. A video summary of the highlights:
The Dwarves And The Primaries
James Joyner puts the Republican field in perspective:
In December 2007, few of us thought that Barack Obama had the gravitas to be elected president. Ditto George W. Bush in December 1999. [Much less a year earlier in both cases — the more apt comparison!]
And, as Nyhan reminds us, there were all manner of reports in late 1991 and early 1992 lampooning the “Seven Dwarfs” who were vying for the Democratic nomination and the opportunity to get trounced by the popular incumbent George H.W. Bush. By the spring they seemed destined to nominate some boob from Arkansas who was “damaged goods” and “who lacks the trust and affection of a majority of Democrats, not to mention the independents vital for victory.” But, as some may recall, Bill Clinton went on to not only beat Bush easily but clobber Bob Dole to win a second term.
The Arabs vs Iran? Please. Ctd
Marc Lynch adds some light:
"The Saudis always want to fight Iranians to the last American" and it is "time for them to get in the game," Secretary of Defense Robert Gates tells the French foreign minister in a newly released cable from February 2010. This captures perfectly the point I made yesterday about how to read the reporting in these cables about the private hawkishness of Arab leaders. The question of Arabs and Iran was never an information problem — it's an analysis problem. The antipathy which many of these leaders feel for Iran has long been well known. But so has their reluctance to do anything about it. And so have the internal divisions within Arab governments and Gulf ruling families, and their deep fears of either Iranian retaliation or popular upheaval, and their bottomless hunger for U.S. weapons systems, and their hopes that the U.S. would magically solve their problems for them, and the disconnect between the palaces and the public.
In yet another post, Goldblog refuses to take the anti-Semite card off the table in this debate, where we share the same goals – the neutering of the Revolutionary Guards and the securing of a two-state solution in Israel/Palestine. This saddens and bores me. Let me just put this as plainly as I can: if Goldblog's readers think I am anti-Semitic, that's their problem, not mine. They need to get over their paranoia in an America where their sense of victimhood is a cheap form of maudling solipsism. There is real and disgusting anti-Semitism in the world, but it isn't based in Adams Morgan.
Meanwhile, how can we tighten pressure in Iran, encourage the Greens and force the Israelis out of their smug suicidal tendencies?