The Other Political Philosophy

by Conor Friedersdorf

Chris Beam has written a long piece on libertarianism in New York magazine. Here's a very short excerpt that encapsulates his critique:

There’s always tension between freedom and fairness. We want less government regulation, but not when it means firms can hire cheap child labor. We want a free market, but not so bankers can deceive investors. Libertarianism, in promoting freedom above all else, pretends the tension doesn’t exist.

Radley Balko explains what bothered him about the piece. John Vecchione challenges an assertion it made. Matt Yglesias quibbles. Additional reactions coming soon, mine included.

What DADT Repeal Means For Marriage

by Patrick Appel

Adam Serwer's guess:

DADT repeal, in my view, considerably accelerates the timeline under which same-sex marriage could become legal, both as a legislative matter and as a result of the Prop 8 case currently headed for the Supreme Court. My calculations here are perhaps a bit cynical–I think that when Ted Olson stands before the Supreme Court and rightfully argues that fundamental rights should not be put to a vote, he will be offering Justice Anthony Kennedy an irresistible and historic opportunity to write a ruling that will change American life as we know it–the kind that, from Lawrence to Citizens United, Kennedy seems to really enjoy writing.  

The View From Your Window Contest: Winner #30

Vfyw-contest_12-25

by Chris Bodenner

Between the low traffic of the Christmas weekend and the difficulty of the above view, the flow of entries this week was pretty weak. A reader writes:

A tricky one. The trees and colorful buildings suggested northern Europe, possibly Scandinavia. On the off chance that the tall white structure in the background is the Olympic Tower, my guess is Helsinki, Finland.  But judging from Google Maps, the terrain around the Olympic Stadium is a bit different from what appears in the photo – the position of the tower in relation to the hill in particular – so I'm not very confident.

Another writes:

This looks an awful lot like Bergen, Norway, a place I visited a couple of times two years ago while working on a cruise ship. The wooded hills in the background, the 19th century European buildings, and the telecommunications tower seem to match my memory very well.

Another:

The snowfall and something about the architecture drew me to Switzerland.  Bern seemed too historic to have the contemporary buildings in this scene, so I headed over to Zurich.  I'm guessing this was taken from one of the western cities on Lake Zurich, looking west.

Another:

I'm going to go with Austria. Why Austria?  1) The yellow apartment buildings – with pink trim on that one set of balconies.  2) The cars – both Renault and VW.  3) The modernist style mixed in with the drab post-war grey.  4) The green in front – such a typical plant for Austria.

Where in Austria? I'm going to make two guesses. My first vote is Bischofshofen. The second vote is for a town on the Westbahn, outside of Vienna, in the Wienerwald. That would be either Purkersdorf or Pressbaum. Why? I'm just guessing. No way I'm going to win, but it's fun to guess …

Another:

Salzburg, Austria? Probably not correct, as my guessing usually doesn't work. It's been a quarter-century since I spent Christmas in Salzburg, but the feeling is right. Thank you for making those memories return.

Another:

Bratislava, Slovakia? The gray winter; the small cars; the shortish, round mountain in the background; the 6-storey, old-school apartment buildings in the foreground with a blocky Soviet style building in the middle; and could that be the top of the Michalska Brana spire obscured by the tree on the left?

Another:

I'm at a loss.  My first thought was northern Europe.  I was going to say something in Scandinavia but stopped myself; wouldn't the snow fall be heavier?  So I'll go farther south.  ummmmmmmm, Warsaw, Poland?

Another:

Freiburg, Germany? A wild guess.  The look is glum-in-winter-Northern European.  Flirted with the Czech Republic (Karlsbad) because of the pastel-colored buildings, but the style isn't quite right and red roofs are the norm.  Germany has black roofs.  The hillside forest is deciduous, sprinkled with evergreens, which means it's not at an alpine elevation.  Also perused Canada briefly but couldn't find the same kind of building density.  Luxembourg City in Luxembourg was a candidate, but it's nestled in a steeper valley than this one.  Because it's in the Black Forest and colorful buildings abound, Freiburg is my choice.  (Seigen and Heilbronn were runners-up.)  But with my luck, after being Europe-centric for hours, the correct locale will turn out to be an old mill town in Maine.

The precise location of the view is Differdange, Luxembourg, taken on December 23 at 12:23 p.m. The following entry was the closest in geographical distance and thus the winner of this week's prize:

Idar-Oberstein, Germany? Just a random guess.

Never hurts to guess! 

(Archive)

Give Sarah Palin An Yglesias Award!

Hewitt-2010

by Patrick Appel

Or award her and Mark Levin the Hathos Alert of the year!  Check out the latest contest highlights here.

Click the following links to vote for the 2010 Malkin AwardMoore AwardYglesias AwardHewitt AwardVon Hoffmann AwardMental Health Break Of The Year, and Face Of The Year. Also – for the first time -  Chart Of The Year and Hathos Alert are on the ballot. The Shut Up And Sing finalists have likewise been announced; it's now up to you to pick the worst pop song designed to reflect a profound moral conscience. I.e. the smuggest, most pretentious pop song in history.

We're giving readers a week to pick the winners for these prestigious prizes. The polls will close on the first of the year. You picked many of the entries; we just marshalled the very best/worst for your selection.

Vote early. Vote often.

The Daily Dish Awards Glossary

Click here to vote for the 2010 Malkin Award!

Click here to vote for the 2010 Yglesias Award!

Click here to vote for the 2010 Moore Award!

Click here to vote for the 2010 Chart Of The Year!

Click here to vote for the 2010 Hewitt Award!

Click here to vote for the 2010 Face Of The Year!

Click here to vote for the 2010 Von Hoffmann Award!

Click here to vote for the 2010 Hathos Alert!

Click here to vote for the Pretentious Pop Song In History!

Click here to vote for the 2010 Mental Health Break Of The Year!

The Cannabis Closet: When Sickness Strikes, Ctd

by Chris Bodenner

The reader who contributed the most powerful entry of our collection follows up:

Over the holiday, my children came home and I showed them “The Cannabis Closet” book, which got here a few days ago. I showed them the excerpt that I had written about their mother’s battle with cancer and her use of marijuana to alleviate the effects of chemo.

Our oldest son, who has his masters in nursing and runs the nursing staff at the local VA hospital, was surprised that I had not included her oncologist’s reaction to her using pot. To tell you the truth, I had forgotten about it. But he thought it was important that I write it out and send it to you. So, here it is. Sorry it's a bit long; I tried to shorten it up.

As I said before in my first letter to you, shortly after she started using pot, she did not suffer the nausea or the aches and pains any longer. She also got her appetite back and put on a little weight. Even her color got better. I also told you that after she began using marijuana she began to open up and talk about her illness and her final wishes. We spent a lot of long evenings on the couch talking and drinking hot chocolate. I will always look back on those evenings as some of the best times we spent together.

When we went to see her oncologist a couple of weeks later for her regular check up, he took one look at her and said, “Well look at you! You look wonderful! Those anti-nausea medications seem to be doing the trick.” She and I looked at each other, and I told him that the pills he had prescribed did nothing to help with her nausea – she still threw up eight to twelve times a day. I told him that she was using marijuana and that it had made a big difference – not only in keeping her from getting sick, but also in helping her get her appetite back and removing her fear of chemo.

He looked at her and asked her if that was true; was she using marijuana? My wife told him yes. His entire demeanor instantly changed. He said that was a load of crap and that he had read all the studies on it and that marijuana did nothing to help the effects of chemo and that she was “stupid” for using an illegal narcotic.

My demeanor instantly changed too, and I asked to speak with him in the hallway.

I followed him out of the exam room, and when he turned to face me I told him if he ever spoke to my wife like that again, I would deck him. I told him that regardless of his feelings about marijuana, it was helping my wife in more ways than simply helping with the nausea; it was helping her open up and talk about her illness – something she had not been able to do until now.

He was not moved at all. He said that if she continued to use marijuana he would refuse to stay on as her primary oncologist. He also threatened to inform our insurance carrier that she was self-medicating against his wishes.

I felt my blood-pressure going up and told him that I wouldn’t let him near her again if he was the last doctor on the planet. I stepped back inside the exam room and told my wife we were leaving. He followed me in and told her what he had told me – that he was going to call our insurance carrier if she did not stop.

I decided that I had heard enough. I turned to him and informed him, maybe a bit louder than I should have, that if he gave out confidential medical information without our prior consent, I would "sue him back to the stone age". And, believe it or not, that stopped him cold. I got my wife’s sweater and purse and helped her up. She was in tears as I led her out. I remember nurses and patients stepping in the hallway wondering what all the fuss was about.

We went out of his waiting room and across the hall into another oncologist’s office. This doctor had treated a good friend of mine until he passed away about a year prior. My late friend’s wife had nothing but good things to say about him and I think we had gotten a second opinion from him earlier in my wife’s treatment. He was a heavy-set, red-haired man who always seemed to be smiling.

I made an appointment with his secretary and a week later we were sitting in his office. He asked why we were switching doctors and I told him what had happened. He looked at my wife and asked her if she was still using pot. She said yes. He asked if it was helping. She said yes. He said, “Well good for you,” and he never brought it up again and continued to treat her until she passed away about six months later.

Marijuana helped us both through a tough time in her illness. Even if it was in her head, as the doctor alluded to, why would anyone in the medical profession take such a hard line on something that was obviously helping? I came to realize that the guy was an egomaniac and a control freak. Why else in God’s name would he take that hard of a stance?

I want to end this by telling you a little more about my wife's death. The cancer that she had migrated to her spinal fluid from the tumor in her brain, and once that happened, she was gone in 24 hours. Our children all made it up in time to say good-bye and it really did seem that she held on until they were all there.

When all the kids were around her bed and each of them had their hands on her, our daughter leaned over her and said, “It’s okay Mama, you can go now”. My wife took two more breaths and was gone. I watched all of this from the doorway and can tell you that I have never seen anything more precious or intimate in my life. It was how she would have wanted to go.

The church had 100-person capacity. Two hundred showed up. I estimated about a third of them had never met her; they were clients of mine and were there for me and the kids. And I can promise you that you have never seen a funeral like hers. People came forward to tell all kinds of “Jane Stories”. She was a wonderfully naive person and you could not help but love her. (Her daughter saw her talking on the cell phone in the backyard one day and noticed that she did not move or walk when she was talking. When she asked her why later, Jane told her daughter that she was afraid of roaming charges.)

One story after another. At times we had to wait until the laughter died down enough to continue. Jane was a teacher for many years and she touched so many lives. The marijuana use was just a blip in her long life. But I feel it played a huge role in helping her come to grips with her illness.

Odd Lie Watch

by Chris Bodenner

Dish readers remain vigilant. One writes:

I'm sure you've seen this already, but it's just too much not to share:

On last night's episode of Sarah Palin's Alaska, the former governor tried to explain how it was a simple typo that created the new word, "refudiate." She said she just mistyped a tweet on her Blackberry. However, the New York Daily News points out that Palin's memory "is not entirely accurate. Prior to her Twitter message, she misspoke the word on Sean Hannity's Fox News show while discussing the NAACP's stance on Tea Party racism."

Just another little lie in the life of a diva.

Another reader points to a less obvious but still odious whopper:

"Conservationists write me these nasty letters because I support an industry like this," the former vice presidential candidate said, after taking a chainsaw to an Evergreen Timber tree. "They write me these nasty letters using their pretty little pencils on their pretty little stationery not realizing. Where do you think your pencil and your piece of paper came from, people? It came from a tree that was harvested."

Really?

There are a significant number of conservationists writing letters to Sarah Palin "in pencil" on pretty stationary?  We're supposed to believe this ridiculous claim?  I don't believe the woman has received even one such letter.  Who sends letters written in pencil on pretty stationary?  (Oh, and in case she hasn't heard, many people buy pretty stationary made from recycled paper.  I do, though I can't remember the last time I wrote a letter in pencil.)

This is a dirty tactic repeatedly employed by Ms. Palin.  She invents fictional versions of people she wishes to ridicule and goes on the attack apropos of nothing. She must spend all her time dreaming up fictional people to throw to the wolves, satisfying the insatiable conservative hunger for hated enemies.

We'll leave it to the big guy to add to the official list when he returns from his blogcation next week.

“Honor Killing” Threatened

by Conor Friedersdorf

Every time I read a story like this one I can never quite understand what motivates its villains to behave so barbarically:

LONDON — The brother of a British Muslim actress who starred in the Harry Potter films pleaded guilty to assaulting his sister, after beating her, forcing her to flee her family home and calling her a "slag" for dating a Hindu man.

Afshan Azad, who played Hogwarts student Padma Patil in four of the movies, refused to testify Monday against her 28-year-old brother, Ashraf, 28, and her 54-year-old father, Abul. Both were found not guilty of threatening to kill her. During the May 21 row at the family's home in Manchester, England, the 22-year-old actress' father allegedly shouted that he would murder the young actress. Scared for her life, she escaped out of her bedroom window and ran to the police, the Manchester Evening News reported.

By threatening violence against this young woman, her family members have brought shame, embarassment and dishonor upon themselves.

The 2010 Daily Dish Awards: An Update

Hewitt-2010

by Patrick Appel

Malkin Award: In what has traditionally been our most competitive award, Roger Ailes has an early lead for calling NPR executives Nazis, but South Carolina Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer is currently in second for comparing government aid recipients to stray animals. And don't count out Bryan Fisher, who's in third for his nutty comment about gay Nazis. Bill Donahue and Glenn Reynolds are fourth and fifth, respectively.

Yglesias Award: With more than a quarter of the votes, Joe Scarborough is leading the pack for taking on Newt Gingrich. Jim Manzi – who called out Mark Levin's climate change nonsense – and Col. David Hunt – who took a courageous stand on DADT – are tied at 15 percent.

Moore Award: Keith Olbermann has nearly a third of the vote for smearing Scott Brown. Sean Penn – who said that journalists should go to prison for calling Hugo Chavez a dictator – and TBogg – who had some vile rhetoric for Bill Kristol – are in a dead heat for second place. Kos, Ed Schultz, and Congressman Steve Cohen are hovering around 10 percent each.

Hewitt Award: Dinesh D'Souza – nominated for his widely criticized Forbes article on Obama – is crushing the competition with almost half the vote. Tom Tancredo, who called Obama the greatest threat to our nation today, is a distant second at 15 percent. 

Von Hoffmann Award: Clifford Stoll has almost 40 percent of the vote for underestimating the internet. Hugh Hewitt is tied for second with our own Andrew Sullivan at 20 percent. Hugh earned his nomination for predicting Tom DeLay's exoneration while Andrew got his for declaring health care reform dead. 

Mental Health Break Of The Year: Radiolab's Visual Poem and Five Minutes Of Awesome – both incredible videos – are in a close race for first. Dogs Are Awesome Too is just a few points behind at 16 percent. And Star Trek Tik Tok and AT-AT-aboy – the sci-fi nominations – are are in fourth and fifth place. If you have a couple minutes to waste, all the videos are worth a look.

Chart Of The Year: At 19 percent, Kamel Makhloufi's visually stunning depiction of deaths in Iraq is neck-in-neck with Aaron Carroll's chart showing just how few Canadians use the US health care system each year. Just a few percentage points behind those charts, at 16 percent, is a depiction of the incarceration rate by The Center for Economic and Policy Research. Technipol/Mark Shea's chart on Muslims, Al Qaeda, And Qu’ran Burners is also in the running with 15 percent.

Face Of The Year: Frederika, Sacha Goldberger's super-hero grandmother, is ahead with almost a quarter of the vote. A striking picture of a Palestinian girl at a beach by Getty's Uriel Sinai is in second place with 15 percent. Moses, a gay Ugandan fleeing his country because of its laws against homosexuality, photographed as he talked at a press conference with a bag over his head to hide his identity, is currently in third. Suzanne Opton's image of a soldier in an unguarded moment and Daniel Berehulak's photo of a Pakistani girl after the floods are vying for fourth as of this writing.

Shut Up And Sing: "Ebony & Ivory" by Paul McCartney and Stevie Wonder is in first with almost a quarter of the vote, but Justin Bieber's "Pray" is making a move from behind.  "This One's for the Children" by New Kids On The Block is in third with 14 percent. Madonna, Michael Jackson, and Sting are currently trailing, but each has around 10 percent of the vote and could stage a comeback. 

Hathos Alert: Bristol Palin and The Situation's teen sex discussion is hard to beat, but Mark Levin's interview with Sarah Palin – if you have the stomach to make it all the way through – is a strong second at 34 percent. For those readers who don't know, hathos is "the attraction to something you really can't stand; it's the compulsion of revulsion." I.e. a "pleasurable sense of loathing."

We're giving readers a week to pick the winners for these prestigious prizes. The polls will close on the first of the year. You picked many of the entries; we just marshalled the very best/worst for your selection.

Award glossary here. Vote early. Vote often.

The Daily Dish Awards Glossary

Click here to vote for the 2010 Malkin Award!

Click here to vote for the 2010 Yglesias Award!

Click here to vote for the 2010 Moore Award!

Click here to vote for the 2010 Chart Of The Year!

Click here to vote for the 2010 Hewitt Award!

Click here to vote for the 2010 Face Of The Year!

Click here to vote for the 2010 Von Hoffmann Award!

Click here to vote for the 2010 Hathos Alert!

Click here to vote for the Pretentious Pop Song In History!

Click here to vote for the 2010 Mental Health Break Of The Year!

A Poem For Monday

AbrahamLincoln3-500

by Zoë Pollock

"Ode to Lincoln" by James Russell Lowell appeared in The Atlantic in 1865:

Such was he, our Martyr-Chief,

Whom late the Nation he had led,

With ashes on her head,

Wept with the passion of an angry grief:

Forgive me, if from present things I turn

To speak what in my heart will beat and burn,

And hang my wreath on his world-honored urn.

Nature, they say, doth dote,

And cannot make a man

Save on some worn-out plan,

Repeating us by rote:

For him her Old-World moulds aside she threw,

And, choosing sweet clay from the breast

Of the unexhausted West,

With stuff untainted shaped a hero new,

Wise, stedfast in the strength of God, and true.

How beautiful to see

Once more a shephert of mankind indeed,

Who loved his charge, but never loved to lead;

One whose meek flock the people joyed to be,

Not lured by any cheat of birth,

But by his clear-grained human worth,

And brave old wisdom of sincerity!

They knew that outward grace is dust;

They could not choose but trust

In that sure-footed mind's unfaltering skill,

And supple-tempered will

That bent like perfect steel to spring again and thrust.

Nothing of Europe here,

Or, then, of Europe fronting mornward still,

Ere any names of Serf and Peer

Could Nature's equal scheme deface;

Here was a type of the true elder race,

And one of Plutarch's men talked with us face to face.

I praise him not; it were too late;

And some innative weakness there must be

In him who condescends to victory

Such as the Present gives, and cannot wait,

Safe in himself as in a fate.

So always firmly he:

He knew to bide his time,

And can his fame abide,

Still patient in his simple faith sublime,

Till the wise years decide.

Great captains, with their guns and drums,

Disturb our judgement for the hour,

But at last silence comes;

These are all gone, and, standing like a tower,

Our children shall behold his fame,

The kindly-earnest, brave, foreseeing man,

Sagacious, patient, dreading praise, not blame,

New birth of our new soil, the first American.