First The Atlantic …

… and now HuffPo?

The Huffington Post, the news site that began in 2005, will post its first annual profit this year and aims to keep sales rising as it turns readers into pundits, founder Arianna Huffington said in an interview.

Can it last? A skeptic:

According to Bloomberg News, Huffington expects to be profitable this year even though it is “investing a lot in growing.” Strangely, Bloomberg quoted a “person close to the company” in the paragraph before saying that the Huffington Post plans to more than triple its sales to $100 million in 2012. Wonder if the same person made both predictions. This indicates that Huffington Post’s profits are rather modest and may not be sustainable if the company continues to spend heavily.

Still, a profit is a profit. Congrats, Arianna.

Assange’s Victim In Algeria

Charles Johnson notices that a pro-democracy reporter in Algeria mistakenly slipped through the cracks of Wikileaks' professed attempts to protect whistle-blowers and endangered informers. Where I oppose Wikileaks strongly is in the revelation of these people to regimes with no mercy. I am told the release of names is unintentional; it remains unforgivable.

Israel’s Demographic Time-Bomb: Defused?

I’ve yet to hear a prediction of the demographics of a future Israel/Palestine that projects a stable Jewish majority for decades to some. In fact, though, the demographic crisis within the 1967 lines is beginning to be revealed as a chimera – because of very high birthrates among the Israeli religious right and gradually declining birthrates among Israeli Arab citizens. Here’s a paragraph from Eric Kaufmann’s Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?:

In 2001, there were around 95,000 Jewish births in Israel and 41,000 Arab births. Just seven years later, in 2008, Jewish births had risen to over 117,000, but Arab births had declined to less than 40,000. In a period that constitutes barely a quarter of a generation, Arab births had fallen from around 30 percent of the total to around 25 percent. This has been a steady trend and, should it continue, it will only be a very short time before Jewish and Arab births each year are broadly proportionate to the overall balance of Jews and Arabs in the population as whole – that is, 4:1, or 80 percent and 20 percent, respectively. 

But when you add the West Bank and Gaza to the equation, the demographic problem re-emerges. Which is why, in my view, those of us who are urgently calling for a two-state solution are better Zionists in many ways than the AIPAC crowd. AIPAC’s current strategy all but guarantees Israel losing its status as a Jewish majority state. But an alternative is available. Razib Khan adds perspective:

Israel is on of the world’s most ethnically diverse societies, with broad ethno-national categories of Ashkenazim, Mizrahim, and Sephardim, though even within these categories there is variation. In addition to this, there are divisions between secular Jews, religious, but not strictly Orthodox Jews, Orthodox Jews of a modern bent, and finally, the Haredi. In this framework arguably the Ashkenazi are bimodal, concentrated among the secular and Haredi segments, while the non-Ashkenazi Jews tend to be religious, but not hyper-observant. On top of this there are also hyper-secular Russian Jews, many of whom are only partly Jewish in origin, as well as the non-Jewish minorities, mostly Arabs.

Haredi Jews are the most ‘conservative’ of Orthodox Jews. We gentiles would probably recognize them as the Jews who ‘dress weird.’ The Hasidic communities are famous, but there are also non-Hasidic Haredi Jewish groups. In Britain the Haredim are 17 percent of the Jewish community. But shockingly they’re currently 75% of the births currently in Britain to Jews! Kaufmann also claims that the Haredi are now ~10% of American Jews in 2010, which would mean that the Orthodox as a whole are now gaining. The patterns in Israel are also striking, though more complex. … In 1960 15 percent of elementary age students in Israel were Arab or Haredi. In 2010 ~50% are. It is because of the Haredi that Israel does not face an immediate demographic crisis as a Jewish state …

More to the point, it seems to me, is that if these stats are borne out over the long term – a huge if, of course – then the proportion of Israelis who are deeply religious will soon easily eclipse the secular Ashkenazi generations of the past. Hence the recent disturbing cultural moments captured in our “Epidemic Of Not Watching” thread.

Israel, it seems to me, could well become an ugly, religiously fundamentalist state with an apartheid religious minority within it. Or it could become a coherent, religious, non-apartheid Jewish state without the occupied territories. What it won’t be is a secular outpost of modernity in a still fundamentalist region.

Kevin Sessums “Bullies” Kevin Spacey

Yes, the actor/director equates being asked if he is gay with isolated gay teens being bullied and harrassed by their peers to the point of suicide. I kid you not:

And I don't understand people who say, "Well, this is a terrible thing that is happening to this young person whose life is being exposed," and then turn around and do it to another person. People have different reasons for the way they live their lives. You cannot put everyone's reasons in the same box. It's just a line I've never crossed and never will.

One reason teens feel shame is because powerful gay men entrench the next generation's sense of isolation by staying needlessly in the closet.

The Weirdness Of The Assange Circus

If anything were ripe for conspiracy theorists, wouldn't the legal wrangling over Julian Assange fit the bill? But what are the odds at this point in the saga that a figure like Assange would be under extradition from Britain to Sweden for a minor crime that seems outlandishly vague and unprovable even by Sweden's standards … and is not under extradition from Britain to the US for the alleged, but oddly non-existent, "crime" of releasing all those government cables and data, procured by an inside source? More than unusually odd given the rarety of such UK-Sweden extradition deals.

It's even stranger since it would be much easier for Assange to be extradited from Britain than from Sweden (Britain has very special relations with the US that Sweden does not). Does Assange want to be forced back to Sweden, where he is freer from possible US intervention? Or is this all a massive, unplanned clusterfuck?

I guess if you live in a country where the government stakes out an interest in whether a condom breaks or not in consensual sex, you may never find out.

Quote For The Day II

"Consider the rhetorical strategy here: let's rue child poverty, a complex, multi-faceted problem, to deflect attention a way for poorly performing schools, which reflect poorly performing structures and systems, including compensation strategies. And do this all while claiming to be the serious person in the room" – Reihan Salam on Diane Ravitch.

The whole piece is Reihan at his best.