Assorted Links

by Conor Friedersdorf

– Alex Knapp continues blogging Liberty and Tyranny. I recently discussed the subject generally with James Poulos. And I talked about other things here with Katherine Mangu-Ward.

– This is as delightful a story about trying to avert a foreclosure as you'll ever read.

– With a small bribe you too can walk into Nobu like it's Whole Foods.

– My favorite pharmacy in America is located in the Florida keys.

– Choose your own adventure.

– Sorry to repeat myself, but I remain obsessed with Pat Dollard's War On Hollywood.

– Jon Stewart at his cable news critiquing best. Can even a casual Daily Show viewer deny that the medium is a joke?

Abortion As The New Slavery, Ctd

by Patrick Appel

Ta-Nehisi – exhausted by this perennial debate - continues to argue that slavery and abortion are not analogous:

Whereas abortion is necessarily premised on ending the existence of a fetus, slave-holding was directly premised on the continued existence of slaves. The lynching of slaves was virtually unheard of in the Old South, not because slave-masters were beneficent, but because they had enormous sums of money invested in them.

In other words, slaves did not simply have "the right to exist"; it was essential to the society that they exist. In this sense, abortion and American chattel slavery could not be more opposite. According to Klein, Santorum believes that "abortion is murder." Santorum is factually wrong. Murder is a legal term that refers to the unlawful taking of a life. Abortion is very much legal. Even a broad reading of murder takes us nowhere. If abortion is murder, then it follows that the thousands of American women who each year get abortions — as a class — are murderers. Slave-holders were investors in a deeply evil scheme. They were not — as a class — murderers.

The Market For Palin Hate? Ctd

by Patrick Appel

Frum, who saw through Palin from the start, counters Douthat:

[L]et me try to explain why the Palin phenomenon cannot be left behind quite so fast.

In 2008, the Republican party nominated for the office of vice-president a person who is now pretty universally agreed to be unfit for the presidency. (Even Taranto agrees with that.) Concededly: it’s not the first time in the history of the republic that this has happened. But here’s the difference between Palin and, say, Spiro Agnew or Henry Wallace. The Palin nomination elicited a huge outpouring of argument from Republicans and conservatives denying that competence mattered at all in a potential president.

Admittedly, much of this defense was insincere. But unfortunately – not all. Palin we could quietly consign to the attic of Republican embarrassments. The apparatus of excuse and justification that surrounded and protected Palin until the day before yesterday – that still chugs away over at the Wall Street Journal – that apparatus remains an overwhelming impediment to any hope of a more responsible conservatism of the future.

Herding The Aisle Hogs

by Zoe Pollock

Steve Kornacki identifies the worst culprits during the President's entrance into the House chamber. From my years at the PBS NewsHour when it was part of my job to log such shots, the aisle hogs always struck me as transparently comical – what could they possibly be saying to the President that's actually important – and ultimately indicative of the bizarre theater of politics. That said, there's a certain beauty in watching the shameless repeat offenders.

Tunisia vs Iran

by Chris Bodenner

Ali Vaez compares and contrasts the two uprisings:

[T]he Tunisian "Jasmine Revolution" and the Iranian "Green Movement" shared striking similarities. In both countries, people from all strata of society partook in the protests, with youth and women at the forefront of the demonstrations. The tragic death of young students, like Neda Agha-Soltan in Iran and Mohammed Bouazizi in Tunisia, fueled the fervor against the oppressive governments. The mobile phones of citizen-journalists, not the professional cameras of Western correspondents, broadcasted the dramatic images of both rebellions. YouTube videos, Facebook pictures and Twitter slogans captured the imagination of millions around the world and served as testaments to the brutality of political orders bereft of mercy. During both movements, approximately 70 people reportedly lost their lives and many more were gravely injured.

The Iranian and Tunisian movements, however, are distinct in three ways. First, the rulers of Iran, comprised of former-revolutionaries who came to power by ousting the Western-backed Pahlavi monarchy, knew well that compromise under pressure only invites more pressure. The Supreme Leader did not show any sign of ceding control and ordered his massive suppression apparatus to nip the Green Movement in the bud.

The Tea Party And Defense Spending

by Conor Friedersdorf

Over at Cato, a sobering assessment:

Since the tea party took off last year, pundits have predicted that its anti-spending zealots would eventually target the Pentagon… The evidence that the new Republicans will challenge defense spending is slight… There is no "isolationist" wing of the GOP. Of the Republicans' 47 senators and 242 representatives, only 5 percent (15 members) expressed support for cutting defense spending. Adding those in the "ambiguously for" category makes it 13 percent. Forty-one percent are against cutting defense spending; with those ambiguously against, it's 60 percent.

The tea party is not mellowing Republican militarism. If it were, freshman Republicans, who mostly proclaim allegiance to the movement, should be more dovish than the rest. That's not the case. Five of the 101 Republican freshmen and 10 of the 184 who aren't newcomers support cutting defense spending. That's about 5 percent of each group.

Skepticism about foreign wars and current defense spending is much more pronounced among voting Republicans than the representatives they elect. But the conservative movement seems cool with this particular elite, Inside-the-Beltway consensus. To be fair, the ideological market for bellicosity in foreign affairs subsidizes some top-notch magazine features at The Weekly Standard. Stripped of foreign policy and Palin it's one of my favorite publications! It seems like National Review could differentiate itself and justify its position as flagship publication of conservatism by hosting the strongest voices on all sides of this question.

Why hasn't that happened? Or have I missed some NR coverage on the subject? It would be rivetting to see Daniel Larison, Michael Brendan Dougherty and Andrew Bacevitch square off against Victor Davis Hanson and Andy McCarthy. I honestly think NR's readership would enjoy that debate, and although I assume I'm being naive in not understanding why it won't happen, I don't actually understand why it won't.

The View From Your Window Contest: Winner #34

Vfyw-contest_1-22

by Chris Bodenner

A reader writes:

Well, the snow, the large body of water frozen, and the dull twilight sky suggest that this is somewhere in the extreme northern latitudes.  I’m going to be different from everyone else who will probably guess Alaska or Iceland and go with Churchill, Manitoba.  It sits on a large body of water, Hudson Bay, that would likely be frozen solid at this time of year (which leads to the town being a big tourist haven for people who want to watch polar bears).

Another writes:

I never even attempt these contests because I’m intimidated by the sheer amount of work people seem to put into the posted correct responses. But in this case, the photo reminded me so strongly of Deadhorse, Alaska that I felt compelled to try. I spent a summer there after high school working for an oil company as a “stickpicker”, picking up debris that gets swept to the tundra while the snow is high and must be cleaned up during the summer thaw lest it endanger the local wildlife. My dad (an oil company employee, who had gotten me the stickpicking job) also had tons of pictures of the “town” during the winter, and this could be one of them.

Another:

Based on the short distance between waves, I would infer that this is located on one of the Great Lakes. One thing I’ve learned living in Michigan is that waves on the Lakes are “closer” than oceanic waves (don’t ask me why). I’m going to guess that this is Kingston, Ontario. I really don’t have any profound reason to say so, other than I am currently reading Margaret Atwood’s novel Alias Grace, which is partially set in Kingston, and I’m a great believer in serendipity.

Another:

Is this Fort Ontario, in Oswego, New York? Looks like the furthermost eastern shore of the Great Lakes. I know them well, having attended college on the same shore just 1/2 mile away.  Burr.

Another:

I can’t pinpoint it, but this looks to be a photo from somewhere in the vicinity of Skagen, Denmark. I’m guessing that’s the Kattegat Sea out there, and that’s the coast of Sweden visible on the horizon. What I can’t find exactly is that stone house with the chimney. Darn.

Another:

The photo was taken from the third floor of a house in the Molbogholman area, on the island of Skorpa, near the town of Kristiansund, Norway. Judging by the relative reflections of the window, the cameraperson was sitting on the edge of a bed, probably the “Bjørn Irkestøm-Slater Walker” model.

Another:

Kirkwall, Orkney, in northern Scotland? Several clues were preset. The house on the Screen shot 2011-01-25 at 1.26.39 AMedge of the frame is unmistakably Scottish and there are possible runway lights, indicating we are close to an airport.  Kirkwall seems to be the only airport close to the coast and the photo vantage point is clearly where the airport perimeter is closest to the coast. The light is also that of midwinter Scotland.

Here is a screenshot from Google’s satellite view. There is some sort of tower visible at the highest magnification and this would be the actual vantage point.  I also include an image of the airport for illustrative purposes (and probably fair use) and it shows the low headland and a wider expanse of similarly flat terrain behind it.

Another:

I believe this is RAF Leuchars airbase, in Fife, Scotland.  The block of flats is unmistakably built of Scottish stone, and the body of water is the local estuary.  The snow on the ground would not be surprising for January in that area.

Another:

Inverness, Scotland? Just a guess. I spent a year in Aberdeen doing graduate work, and in viewing this photo I began to feel as depressed as I felt during that year of bleakness.

Another:

Instant reaction – that’s St. Andrews!

Looking north along the beach, with a tricksied-out snow-covered Old Course on the left. RAF Leuchars in the background, almost, at the other side of the inlet. Sheesh – haven’t been there since I was a laddie.

Another:

Image002

The Home of Golf.  Just across Links street from the 18th Hole of the over five centuries old “Old Course.”  White golf balls not recommended in January.

Another:

This is a view from the Rusacks Hotel in St Andrews across the middle of the 18th and 1st holes, made somewhat tricky by the fact you can’t see the famous bridge over Grannie Clark’s Wynd. The four bright lights in the background I assume are from Leuchars Airforce base – soon to be closed down.  I originally thought this was the Moray Firth and Inverness airport, but a bit of effort on Google maps yielded the right answer.

Another:

Finally, a VFYW that I recognize!  Although I wasn’t entirely sure at first, the giveaways are the tire tracks across the Old Course and the wire meshing on a section of the sand dunes (they were damaged last year during a storm and they’re meant to re-establish and protect that section).  It’s also helps that I’ve lived here for going on three years now!

Another:

It looks like the North Sea on the right and the Old Course off to the left. It’s probably around 3PM and already twilight. All sensible Scotsmen are already at their favorite pub.

Another:

The way these contests have been going, I know I’ll lose to someone who was conceived in that room and later shattered its window with an errant slice from the Old Course.  The closest I’ve been to St. Andrews was hitchhiking down that coast from Aberdeen in the seventies as a college student. I got a lift from two gregarious Scots who took me along on their all-day pub-crawl down the coast. When, at each new pub, I’d try to turn down the second dram, one would fix me with a squint and say “Aahndy, yer too serious”.  He was right.

Another:

It’s Saturday and I don’t want to work on my English paper so I’m scrolling through the Daily Dish expecting to log maybe five solid minutes of procrastination. And two hours later this is what I’ve got:

I recognized that beach View1immediately as the West Sands of St Andrews. I spent last fall semester abroad at St Andrews University, and on nice days I would run or play frisbee on that beach. On windy or rainy ones, I’d detour by this beach on my routes to and from class to watch the waves froth (as they’re starting to do in the photo). The path that cuts through the middle is Grannie Clark’s Wynd, where it’s wise to look both ways and up before crossing unless you’re looking to add a golf-ball-sized lump to the top of your head.

The general location was easy but it took me a bit of work to find which building this was taken from. After a bit of work with Google Streetview, I have to conclude that this picture must have been taken from a room in the Macdonald Rusacks Hotel, located between The Links and Links Crescent, right off the 18th green. The wall on the right side of the VFYW image is also part of the Rusacks hotel, and there are only a few other windows in the hotel from which this wall would be visible, so I’ve circled in my first attached image the exact window that this picture was taken from.

More evidence attached. Here are the hyperlinks for the Streetviews that I’ve used: View1, View2, View3, View4. Thanks for the opportunity for procrastination!

Another:

Upon my first glance at this, I thought “wow, this is a hard one.” Then the British Open popped into my head.  I’ve never been to St. Andrews or to The Royal and Ancient Golf Club of St Andrews, but as a fan of golf, I recognized the architecture of the building’s edge as being similar to some of the buildings I have seen around at least one of the Open Championship courses.

Another:

ViewFromYourWindowStAndrews This was the first VFYW that I got instantaneously, as I imagine just about any hardcore golf fan would.  I’ve never been to the old course, but my father has, and I recognized the terrain and style of building from the photos he brought back.

After that it was simply a matter of tracking down exactly which building the view was taken from.  Attached is a screen grab from GoogleEarth.

 

Another:

My father-in-law passed away this morning, about two hours before you posted the pic. Our trip to St. Andrews (and a chance to play the course) was a highlight of his life.

Another:

I spent a week in Scotland with friends in 2005, and although covered in snow, I couldn’t mistake the feel of The Old Course and surrounding St Andrews. We were fortunate enough to grab a tee time through the lottery system and enjoyed an unexpected round of golf at The Old Course.

Another:

Too easy once you played there. The building shown is captured in this video.  First time teeing off on Old Course … and making a birdie on the hole:

Another:

This one I don’t even need to look up! If you were to look right along the fairway you would see the familiar club house of the Royal and Ancient Golf Club, which sets the rules of the game across the world, and Hamilton Hall, which at least until a few years ago was a residence hall of the University of St. Andrews. (Here is an article about Hamilton Hall from the Wall Street Journal with a great picture of the golf course and both buildings.)

The reason I know this by heart is that I was a student at the University of St. Andrews from 2001 to 2005. As part of my studies I spent a year at an American university, and ended up staying and continuing my studies in the United States. Although I consider the United States my home I think back to St. Andrews mostly with fondness. (I don’t miss the deep-fried Mars bars, however.)

Another:

This photograph has gotten me completely hooked on this contest.  As an architect I recognized this  19 Pilmour Links, St. Andrews, Fife house as Georgian and somewhere in the UK.  This past year I have been doing a lot of genealogical research on my Jacobite ancestors who fled to the Carolinas after their defeat at the Battle of Culloden, so I have been looking at a lot of Scottish Architecture in researching their ancestral homes.   I recognized the stone on the building as coming from Scotland.  The setting appears to be remote but I think that is deceptive.  So, I started looking for a town close to a sandy beach and that led me to St. Andrews.  I have attached a photograph of a similar house located at 19 Pilmour Links.

Another:

My wife and I were married in Scotland in September 1986 during a visit with my sister, who lives in Edinburgh.  After our wedding we had planned a trip to Paris, but terrorist activity there had pretty much shut the city down.  Since that’s not the kind of experience we wanted for our first visit to Paris, we decided to rent a car and tour Scotland.  We headed up the west coast, took ferries out to the Outer Hebrides, and returned to Edinburgh by way of the east coast, including a quick visit to St. Andrews.  Although we’ve returned to Scotland a number of times since then, we never went back to St. Andrews.  So whether this scene looks familiar because of our visit many years ago, or because I sometimes watch golf on television, my immediate reaction was that this is a view looking north over what I think is called the Old Course.

Another:

The only amusing St Andrews anecdote I have is recalling when my wife’s family and I successfully reenacted the opening scene of Chariots of Fire along the beach upon which it was filmed (which you can see in the photo), madly shouting the soundtrack as we went.  The complete ambivalence of the local seagulls suggested this may have been a regular occurrence.

There were many equally-accurate guesses this week, so it’s difficult to single out just one for the prize. But among them was the following reader, who submitted a long and precise response to last week’s view from Double Bay:

This window at Rusacks Hotel, St. Andrews, Scotland. I’ve attached a photo marking the specific hotel window from which it was taken. Don’t have time to write a long pitch, but surely getting the exact window two weeks in a row counts for something!

It does!

(Archive)

“Bad Medicine” Ctd

by Zoe Pollock

Jill at Feministe responds to Saletan's challenge:

We’re debating the rights of some group of theoretical women who want to have post-viability abortions, and who have no medical reason to do so, and who were perfectly able to access abortion earlier in their pregnancies. Why? Seriously, why are we doing that? There are not significant numbers of these women. Abortions after 24 weeks are already highly restricted, and can’t just be done on a whim. This is not really a significant point in the abortion debates, theoretically or realistically.

What does impact thousands and thousands of women is the fact that abortions are hard to get because anti-choicers have erected a bunch of barriers, using many of the same arguments that Saletan focuses on in this piece…

Saletan, you have a big platform. If you agree that accessibility and contraception access and education are all key to decreasing the number of second-trimester abortions, why aren’t you doing the legwork of advocating for those things, instead of challenging pro-choicers to debate largely theoretical questions whose answers don’t have much real-world impact anyway? What’s the end game of this debate?

“Your Interview With The President”

by Patrick Appel

The top questions – as voted on by the internet – all relate to drug policy. Scott Morgan sighs:

Honestly, it blows me away that the White House is still putting on these sorts of forums, knowing as we all do that questions about legalizing drugs will win and that, in all likelihood, the President won't answer them. Of course, the whole thing is just a big publicity stunt, but it's premised entirely on the concept that people get to vote on what issues they want the President to talk about. That's the hook, and ignoring it makes the whole exercise seem a bit ridiculous.