Testing Is A Farce

So says Dan DiMaggio, an employee in the booming standardized testing industry. Jessica Lussenhop reports:

Although DiMaggio had been through a training process, he found himself tripped up as he began scoring the essays. What made the organization "good" as opposed to "excellent"? What happens when the kid doesn't answer the question at all, but writes with excellent organization about whatever the hell he wants?

Along the same lines, Dana Goldstein worries about test-score inflation and "the unintended consequences of well-intentioned standards-and-accountability education reforms."

The Latest From Japan

The Daily What rounds up weekend developments from around the web:

Several injuries reported after an explosion at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant (see video [here]) caused by a pumping system failure damaged the building housing nuclear reactor No. 1, but did not not damage the reactor itself; French Nuclear Safety Authority: Favorable winds will blow radioactive pollution from explosion out over Pacific; Japanese PM Naoto Kan: I will take all necessary measures to keep residents safe from harm; evacuation area around plant expanded to 12 miles, 45,000 evacuated so far; seawater is being used in “last-ditch effort” to avoid a meltdown; STRATFOR: Meltdown already taking place; AP: “[M]eltdown may not pose a widespread danger“; FEMA: What to do during a nuclear power plant emergency; additional tips at SLOG; Reddit AMA: “I live in Fukushima city.”  

Latest Figures [as of Saturday]: 686 confirmed deaths; Kyodo: Death toll could exceed 1,700; … 4.4million households without power.

Figures as of this morning: "The official death toll is now 1,647, with at least 1,720 people missing and 1,990 injured." And that toll is climbing dramatically:

About 1,000 bodies were found coming ashore on hardest-hit Miyagi's Ojika Peninsula and another 1,000 have been spotted in the town of Minamisanriku where the prefectural government has been unable to contact about 10,000 people, or over half the local population.

TDW also finds two dramatic clips from Friday, one of a tsunami sweeping away a parking lot of cars outside Sendai Airport and another of reclaimed ground rupturing in Chiba City. The above video, shot this morning, shows the latest explosion at Fukushima:

Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said the plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co. confirmed that the 11:01 a.m. blast did not damage the container of the No. 3 reactor, allaying concerns that the explosion may have caused a massive release of radioactive substance. TEPCO said three workers, including its employees, were injured by the blast. All of them suffered bruises.

''According to the plant chief's assessment, the container's health has been maintained,'' Edano told a press conference. ''The possibility is low that massive radioactive materials have spattered.''

The latest nuclear updates at Brave New Climate. And as if Japan wasn't having enough problems:

Sunday's eruption [on Kyushu island], which was the biggest volcanic activity in Shinmoedake in 52 years, caused widespread destruction and panic. The blast could be heard for miles, and shattered windows four miles away, the BBC reported. Hundreds of people fled the area as the volcano spewed debris, including hot ash and rocks, more than 6,000 feet in the air, according to BBC reports.

Beck Busts O’Keefe: The Video Framing Of NPR

In an unexpected turn, The Blaze, a Web site owned by Glenn Beck and edited by Scott Baker, a co-founder and former editor of Breitbart.tv, has published a detailed takedown of the James O’Keefe NPR sting.

The Blaze’s Pam Key, who produces most of our original videos, is experienced in reviewing hours and hours of raw audio/video to find key sections that can then be used in proper context.  Her review of the NPR exposé identifies a number of areas to examine. Do these areas reveal problematic editing choices?  Are assertions made in the video misleading? Are the tactics used by the video producers unethical?

The answers to all these questions seem to be yes. Despite the fact that O’Keefe is a known liar, and that his past video stings have been edited in misleading ways, much of the mainstream media ran with his latest. Will those outlets now inform their viewers and readers about the deceptions uncovered by The Blaze?  Here’s one more fact check among many:

4 Racist tea Party from Naked Emperor News on Vimeo.

The rest of the videos are here.

Watching It Come Toward You

If you haven't seen this video of the tsunami approaching from the street-level, you haven't quite yet absorbed the terrifying power of this death machine. When the buildings start moving off their foundations and sail through the city streets, it is hard not to gasp. I wish I could be more eloquent, but sometimes words fail.

“This Is Wrong”

This embed is invalid

The president's dismissal of PJ Crowley for defending core American values is a teaching moment for me. My take here. Transcript of Frontline's interview with Manning's father here. The full video here. The Pentagon responds:

“The circumstances of PFC Manning’s pretrial confinement are regularly reviewed, and complies in all respects with U.S. law and Department of Defense regulations.

“In recent days, as the result of concerns for PFC Manning’s personal safety, his undergarments were taken from him during sleeping hours. He was not made to stand naked for morning count, but on one day, he chose to do so. There were no female personnel present at the time. PFC Manning has since been issued a garment to sleep in at night. He is clothed in a standard jumpsuit during the day. None of the conditions under which PFC Manning is held are punitive in nature.”

Solitary confinement 23 hours in a 12' x 6' cell a day not "punitive in nature"? For a model prisoner not even convicted of anything yet? Money quote from Wiki:

Manning's lawyer released an 11-page letter from Manning on March 10, 2011, written to the U.S. military in response to their decision to retain his Prevention of Injury status. In the letter, he described having been placed on suicide watch for three days in January, and having had his clothing removed, apart from underwear, as well as prescription eyeglasses; he said the loss of the latter forced him to sit in "essential blindness." He wrote that he believed this was done as retribution for a protest his supporters had held outside the jail the day before; he alleged that, just before the suicide watch began, the guards began harassing him and issuing conflicting orders, telling him to turn left, then not to turn left.

He also described being required to sleep without clothes and stand naked for morning parade: "The guard told me to stand at parade rest, with my hands behind my back and my legs spaced shoulder width apart. I stood at "parade rest" for about three minutes until the DBS [duty brig supervisor] arrived. … The DBS looked at me, paused for a moment, and then continued to the next detainee's cell. I was incredibly embarrassed at having all these people stare at me naked. …" He wrote that he was later given a smock to wear at night, which he described as coarse and uncomfortable, and said he regarded the decision to remove his other clothing at night as unlawful pretrial punishment.

The Pentagon has described this as "poppycock", a dimissal agreed with by the president – indeed so passionately he has fired PJ Crowley.

I wish I could believe the Pentagon any more about this kind of thing. They have repeatedly lied – and been caught doing so – in this war, especially when it comes to prisoner treatment. What I do know is that the president needs to do more when such reports emerge than merely ask the people responsible for Manning's treatment if he was being mistreated. And that, it appears, is all he has done:

"I have actually asked the Pentagon whether or not the procedures that have been taken in terms of his confinement are appropriate and are meeting our basic standards. They assured me that they are."

If you believe that, you'll also believe we're winning in Afghanistan. One wonders: does this president take everything the military tells him at face value? Is he that deferent to them? He's the commander-in-chief.

Palin vs Ailes

She refused to listen to him and lie low after the Tucson shooting. Going rogue on Ailes is usually not good career advice in the right-wing media-industrial complex:

Fox executives have been discussing when they need a definite answer from Palin on her presidential intentions. Fox is hosting the first GOP debate on May 5 in South Carolina. If Palin participates in the debate, then her Fox contract will be suspended. Given her media exposure and grassroots operation, Palin might like to delay a decision until the fall, or later. Whether Fox will tolerate that is another matter.

She'll wait till the fall. She don't need no stinking debates.

Bill And Arianna: So Really …

The make-up post with an edge:

For the record, I like Arianna Huffington. Sorry to disappoint those folks yearning for a Wrestlemania smackdown, but I think she’s a shrewd entrepreneur and a charming woman. Also, we seem to share a belief in hiring professional journalists; she’s hired some good ones from The Times. (We won’t dwell on the fact that her new owners at AOL laid off 200 journalists to help pay for the acquisition of The Huffington Post.) So, really, I like Arianna.

Closed Doors

Finbarr

Photographer Finbarr O’Reilly contemplates them:

These doorways symbolize the closed nature of Afghan society, as well as the fact that United States Marines are tolerated — but not entirely welcomed — by the local population. I suppose, in some way, they also reflect my own frustration about not having access to the people of Afghanistan while on military embeds. Photographing doors allowed me to imagine the hidden world behind them, like the line from Baudelaire’s poem, “Windows“: “Looking from outside into an open window one never sees as much as when one looks through a closed window.”

Frankly Rich

PM Carpenter reacts to the news of Frank Rich's departure from political-cultural commentary on the NYT op-ed page:

We are in trouble. And from what I could gather from what you observed this morning, Mr. Rich — with which I wholeheartedly agree — we're largely in trouble because absolute nincompoops dominate public debate, that corrosive trend is getting even worse, and you, for your part, are outta here.

I don't buy the premise of this. I think Rich's departure is probably what he says it is: an understandable desire to move on after 17 years. But it also reflects the fact that in the age of the web, Rich's readers and fans will only have to click a mouse once to find him again. New York's print circulation is around 400,000 – less than a third of the Sunday NYT's, but nothing to sneeze at, and its online circulation is at a slowly growing 5 million unique visitors a month. Its editor is one of the best in the world, Adam Moss, and he has a long, fruitful relationship with Frank. The website and magazine have won so many awards you have to wade through an ocean of metal elephants to find the editor.

In other words, I don't think it matters much to those under, say, 50, where Rich writes. The NYT op-ed page is like every other page on the web. Click once and you're there. The same will be true of any page at nymag.com, already a booming, innovative site. What matters is his voice. It's going nowhere.