The NYT really needs to get a grip. Here's Ethan Bronner parroting Likudnik propaganda:
Mr. Obama said that the solution should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed land swaps, meaning that if Israel, as expected, held onto some close-in settlements, it would have to yield an equal amount of land to the future state of Palestine from within its borders.
Where the fuck is that in the speech? Obama made no mention of perfectly equal land-swaps. Unless Bronner is capable of reading minds, or I am missing something, there is nothing here that is different from Bush's position. I notice the NYT has changed its headline on Bronner's piece. I've defended Bronner in the past, but this knee-jerk parroting of Israeli government spin as fact is downright embarrassing.
The Dish 