Matt Buchanan marvels at the dogs of war:
[D]id you know some of them have titanium fangs, designed to rip through enemy protective armor? That titanium grill runs $2,000 per tooth. The end result, US military dog trainer Alex Dunbar tells The Daily, is that being bitten is "like being stabbed four times at once with a bone crusher." Hard. Core.
Update: Ackerman brings the enthusiasm down to earth:
The only reason to have titanium teeth? Medical reasons, [K-9 trainer Jeff Franklin] says, like “if a dog breaks a tooth … it’s the same as a crown for a human.”
Brian Palmer looks to the history books:
The U.S. military has deployed canines for centuries, but never sent them into combat until about fifty years ago. Military dogs used to be trained for super-aggression. They were used as sentries and guard dogs, and were taught to distrust all humans but the handler. As a result, they couldn't function as part of a combat team, because they had a habit of biting other members of the unit. Modern war dogs are far more comfortable working with strangers, even those wearing intimidating commando outfits.
A reader recommends "War Dogs of the Pacific":
The documentary aired on PBS and some other channels a while back. It's very moving. Similar to the way that "Maus" made the Holocaust more real by making the main characters animals, it makes the U.S. war in the Pacific more real through the recounting of the heroics of these voiceless four-legged soldiers. Somehow they generate genuine empathy; make the incomprehensible-unless-you-were-there nature of combat more comprehensible than any human documentary ever has, for me at least. I'd guess it's because we have a self-protecting instinct against identifying with the horrors our fellow humans experienced, but don't have that same instinct for animals.
Fair warning: Many readers will cry.