A reader writes:
It seems odd that you should ignore entirely the fact that Mr. Hari, a "friend" to whose work you have linked generously, has most likely seen his career explode in a manner almost as severe as Stephen Glass. I am sure you would have had something to say in this regard. Perhaps you are trying to be a good friend by withholding comment. Nonetheless, it strikes me that, given your liberal linkage to his work, your readers have a right to know that some of it has been fictional. Also, and perhaps more importantly, you seem like you might have an interesting two cents to offer. No?
Well, I was in England when this emerged. Johann has indeed become a friend, but this blog has forced me to lose many friendships over the years and so I will not hesitate to give an opinion at some point. (See my recent criticism of Bruce Bawer's writing). But it seems fair to me to wait for the conclusion of a thorough inquiry by the Independent before commenting. Hari has a right to make his case against his many foes, and these allegations can easily be made. My friendship with him, as with others I have to cover in this job, is unconditional. So is my commitment to writing the truth as best I can.
The Dish 