An important new detail from Pennlive.com. Here's the email he sent to a friend, arguing that the Grand Jury report was misleading in its summary of events:
“I did stop it, not physically … but made sure it was stopped when I left that locker room … I did have discussions with police and with the official at the university in charge of police …. no one can imagine my thoughts or wants to be in my shoes for those 30-45 seconds … trust me. I am getting hammered for handling this the right way … or what I thought at the time was right … I had to make tough, impacting quick decisions.”
The report says:
"The graduate assistant was never questioned by University police and no other entity conducted an investigation."
The conflicts in these accounts are mounting. I may well have been wrong to trust the Grand Jury report summary. Its details may help. But we won't get the full story till the trials.
The Dish 