Nona Willis Aronowitz wonders if independents will ever organize themselves:
In the Occupy Wall Street era, an off-the-script option makes all the sense in the world. We're fed up with the political system and how it's funded, and many of us bemoan voting for the lesser of two evils. But when it comes to independents, we underestimate our own power of mobilization and assume they'll lose. We long for third-party candidates to win, but we give up on them before they start.
A Gallup poll in May found that 52 percent of the nation think a third party is needed. There are more independents than registered Democrats or Republicans—37 percent in all. There have been grassroots efforts to pick an independent, even as most people roll their eyes at the possibility. But why? This group is the one who swings elections. They're the ones candidates pander to in the presidential race. Every time an independent or third party candidate surfaces, he or she dares us to prove what's possible when we flex our democratic muscle. Why have we been too chicken to respond?
Steve Coll runs the numbers on past Libertarian turnout and how they've affected the general election:
If Paul did run again as a Libertarian, he would surely exceed the Party’s best-ever performance in a Presidential election of about a million votes nationally, in 1980, another year of discontent. (The candidate was Ed Clark.) Carla Howell, the Party’s executive director, told me this week that Libertarian Party will qualify for the general-election ballot in virtually all states—"the high forties, if not fifty"—and there is good reason to think it could.
The Dish 