Skip to content

The Dish

KEEPER ITEMS

  • The Years Of Writing
    Dangerously
  • The Miracle Of Francis
  • As The World Turns
  • How To Read
    The Entire Internet
  • Your Moments Of Dishness
  • The End Of The Dish
    (Multiple Posts)
  • Living The Dishhead Dream
  • The War
  • The Long Game Of
    Barack Obama
  • The Online Conversation
    That’s Dying Out
  • The Arc Of The Dish
    2000 – 2015
  • A Note To My Readers
    • Keeper Archive



  • Taking A Stand
    On The Can
  • Would You Report Your Rape?
  • Busted With An Eggcorn








  • Blogger-in-Chief Andrew Sullivan
  • Editors Patrick Appel
    Chris Bodenner
    Jessie Roberts
  • Managing Editor Chas Danner
  • International Editor Jonah Shepp
  • Literary Editor Matthew Sitman
  • Poetry Editor Alice Quinn




“Social Darwinism”?

Why is that less offensive when used to describe the radical tax and spending cuts offered by Romney-Ryan than the use of the word "socialist" to describe the president? David Boaz has a point.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...
Posted on Apr 5 2012 @ 1:04pmAuthor Andrew SullivanCategories The Dish

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: The Santorum Dead-Enders
Next Next post: Moore Award Nominee
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Reblog
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • The Dish
      • Join 4,997 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Dish
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d