The Tories’ Generational Challenge

It’s not just the American right that’s having trouble reaching younger generations. The Euroskeptic Tories face an increasingly Europe-friendly generation. A young UK Independence Party member wrings his hands:

Those of us who want to leave the EU face a stark reality: we face a generational time bomb which we must start doing all we can to defuse.

YouGov’s most recent EU poll demonstrated once again how voters were split on the EU by age. Forty-five per cent of 18- to 24-year-olds want to stay in the EU, compared to just 32 per cent who want to leave; similarly, those between 25 and 39 favoured staying in, by 47 per cent to 27. Older generations feel differently: 43 per cent of those between 40 and 59 want out, against 38 per cent, and among the over-60s a massive 56 per cent want to leave, compared to just 33 per cent wanting to stay in.

Without the euro, with huge trade benefits, and with easy travel, I can see why younger Brits see no reason to embark on such a radical change. Britain has been in the EU since 1975. Why do Tories want to rip up a relationship that is now entrenched for almost half a century? Can’t they just do what they’ve always done: grumble loudly and muddle through?

Now We Should Add FA To LGBT?

Well at least it would give us a vowel. And FAG-BLT maintains both a gay and faintly nutritious aura. But Anna Mollow argues that homophobia is very similar to the prejudice experienced by obese people:

Nor is fatness, as conservatives often claim about homosexuality, a “lifestyle.” Body size is determined primarily by genetics, and while diets and exercise programs may produce short-term weight loss, they have a 95 percent failure rate over the long term. Yet Weight-Loss Summer Camp For Students In Shenyanglike queer people living with HIV or AIDS, fat people are stigmatized for a condition that is imagined to be their fault. They are hectored by conservatives such as Mike Huckabee, mocked by liberals like Jon Stewart (who, of course, would never dream of making lesbians or gay men the butt of his jokes), harangued about their weight by medical professionals, and subjected to a barrage of advertisements promising “cures” for their supposed disorder.

Does this sound familiar? Remember psychiatry’s attempts to cure homosexuality? Our culture’s hand-wringing over the “obesity epidemic,” its hawking of one breakthrough diet or miracle weight-loss product after another, and its moralistic shaming of those it deems “too fat” are as conducive to self-hatred as “gay conversion therapy.” But while the harmful conversion therapy that religious conservatives practice on lgbtq people has rightly been the target of political protest and legal intervention, the medically sanctioned use of weight conversion therapy (a.k.a. dieting) has provoked far less outrage on the Left.

Camille Dodero has drawn parallels between the push for gay rights and the fat-acceptance movement:

Fat Admirers (FA) have historically adopted queer nomenclature for their self-discovery stages and preferences.

Men who openly pursue, prefer, and date fat women are “out.” Men who like fat women but more or less hide them from friends and family are “closeted.” Men who say they like both skinny and supersize women ones are “bisizuals,” a controversial term that’s regarded as disingenuous in various online circles.

Keith Ferguson, a 24-year-old FA from Westchester (“We had two African-American kids in our schools and one fat girl”), wonders if he would have been treated better if he’d been gay. “The immediate reception from my friends was, ‘You’re a fetishistic freak, and I can’t believe I hang out with you.’ ” He confided in a friend, who then spilled it to their freshman class. “It’s almost like the same level of stigma that a homosexual would deal with. But in high school, there were two ‘out’ gay kids before I turned 16. People were like, ‘Ah-hahaha, you’re gay.’ They were maybe on the outskirts of the socially accepted circle, at the end of the day, but enough people liked them that it didn’t really matter. For me, I was actually ostracized.”

Previous Dish on obesity here, here, and here.

(Photo: Overweight students attend military training during a weight-loss summer camp on July 30, 2009 in Shenyang of Liaoning Province, China. China saw a growing number of diabetics amongst children and adolescents in its major cities, approximately 12 percent of whom were found to be obese, according to a report released in 2008 by Ministry of Health. By Yang Xinyue/ChinaFotoPress/Getty Images.)

The Coup Watched ‘Round The Arab World

Egyptian President Morsi Ousted In Military Coup

Rania Abouzeid considers what the events in Egypt signal to other “Arab Spring” countries:

Egyptians aren’t the only ones watching. The rise of political Islamism during the so-called Arab Spring was in many ways a reaction to the repression of Islamists under the various secular regimes they helped topple in Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt. Their rise was like a recoil after the restrictions on their political participation were lifted. An equilibrium was bound to be reached at some point, although the fear was always that, once in power, Islamists might curtail the very freedoms that helped them get there—one vote, one time, so to speak. What is the message from the pro-democracy advocates in Tahrir Square? Was it that if the results at the ballot box don’t go your way, and your interests coincide with that of the military, it’s fine to depose Egypt’s first democratically elected leader? That even if Islamists play by democracy’s rules and win an election, they can be undemocratically removed?

Many Egyptians, it appears, would say yes.

I was struck by this quote from an Egyptian woman in the NYT today:

“Why is it just ballot boxes? Are ballot boxes the only forms of democratic expression when the rulers fail the people? Why did we have to bear his bad administration at a time when the country cannot cope with such failure?”

Channeling Jefferson?

What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?

Like others, I remain conflicted about what just happened in Egypt – worried about the coup precedent, yet relieved by the ouster of someone incapable of uniting the country. But the faces on the streets, the unusually massive public demonstrations, and the dismal record of Morsi tip the balance, in the end, for me, for now. The integration of the Arab Muslim world into modernity will be messy, protracted and contain any number of twists and turns. Our role should be patience and distance, not micromanagement. This is their struggle before it is ours. And we have to let them lead us, not the other way round.

(Photo: An Egyptian woman celebrates in Tahrir Square, the day after former Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi, the country’s first democratically elected president, was ousted from power on July 4, 2013 in Cairo, Egypt. By Ed Giles/Getty Images.)

Police State Watch, Ctd

A reader objects to my sympathy over the shooting of this Rottweiler:

Give me a break! The only person to blame for that dog’s death is his owner. When the police are investigating a potentially volatile situation, the correct response for any citizen is to stay the fuck back! Instead, he got out of his car and escalated the situation. He acted irresponsibly and his dog Max paid the price for it. Maybe you’re blinded by your love for beagles, but a rottweiler is no beagle. If one was charging at me and I had a gun, I’d shoot the damn thing dead too. Better the dog than me (or my face). Do a Google image search for “Rottweiler attacks”.

Another:

I can’t disagree with you more about the dog shooting.

If I’m a cop and some guy’s Rottweiler jumps out of a car window and starts menacing me, then I’m opening fire. I’ve got a guy in cuffs who seemed to be trolling for a confrontation and an angry, threatening dog of unknown training and you want me to say “here nice doggy, doggy?” No way. People first, pets second.

How about a little personal responsibility on the part of that dog owner and countless others like him. Why is someone’s out-of-control dog the problem and not fault of the dog’s owner and protector? Furthermore, what was the guy thinking? I’ll leave my dog baking in the car under the California sun while I get booked downtown. Is somebody going to approach the car with a barking Rottweiler in it so they can care for the dog?

If this rant seems over the top, then it’s because I’m sick of dog wastes on the sidewalk and in public places. Just because you think your dog is great or whatever isn’t an excuse to let it shit on our shared spaces. Same with crotch sniffing, baby scaring, licking whatever, “oh he’s just playing (or saying hello)” dog encounters. You want that in your private spaces, be my guest. You want that in our public areas, I’m bringing mace.

All righty then. You can watch the video yourself to judge if the dog was a genuine threat to the cops or just an opportunity to kill something with a gun.

The Quintessential American Word: “Hi!” Ctd

A reader writes:

Apropos of your coverage of “Hi” as distinctively American, I thought you might be amused by this anecdote. Many years ago, while touring New Orleans, I decided to go to a service at the Catholic cathedral in Jackson Square, in the heart of the French Quarter.  I’d been raised a Lutheran, though I was a lapsed one at the time, and I had never attended a Catholic service before.  At the end of it, the priest asked the congregation to something or other (I forget his exact words), at which point the immaculately dressed elderly lady in front of me turned around and said to me, “May the peace of God be with you.”  I was so discombobulated by this completely unexpected turn of liturgical events that all I found myself blurting out to her was “Hi!”

Another reader:

“Hi!” was my first, and for a long time, only, word, as a baby.  It is for many American kids.  “Hi!” “Hi!”  They hear it all around.

Another:

We have neighbors who moved in last year from Burma. They are part of the Karen ethnic group. They have two small kids, maybe 4 and 5. Their family and ours have struggled with the language barrier, but whenever the kids see me they say “HI!”. I finally got a chance to talk to an English-speaking family member, and asked what the normal Karen greeting was. Like many languages, it depends on the time of day, and the relative station each speaker occupies. But the kids have found a great new toy – greeting someone without worrying about any of that stuff. “Hi!”

Someone should start a new blog about democracy in America. Call it “Hi Times.”

The Roots Behind Pussy Riot

Novelist Mikhail Shishkin examines modern Russian history and sees literature and politics long locked in a tense embrace:

The state in Russia fears the poet because, beginning with Pushkin, he (or she) is a power USSR Stampindependent of the state and insubordinate to the state, a power just as sacred—the representative of another country, but one that falls within the borders of the same empire. The resulting duality of power led inevitably to conflict: how can two powers, both appealing to a higher divine authority, coexist in one totalitarian state? This was the ultimate question of Russian literature, to which every generation of Russian writers painfully sought an answer: should the poet be with the czar, or against him?

Previous regimes tried to co-opt poetry, but, according to Shishkin, Putin is unlikely to follow suit:

The new authoritarianism in Russia could not care less about literature; its priority is to control the electorate through television.

(Image: Soviet stamp with image of Pushkin circa 1956 via Wikimedia Commons)

“Eleven Oligarchs In Robes”

Ezra highlights Justice Roberts’ unique and immense power in presiding over the system of FISA courts:

The 11 FISA judges, chosen from throughout the federal bench for seven-year terms, are all appointed by the chief justice. In fact, every FISA judge currently serving was appointed by Chief Justice John Roberts, who will continue making such appointments until he retires or dies. FISA judges don’t need confirmation — by Congress or anyone else.

No other part of U.S. law works this way. The chief justice can’t choose the judges who rule on health law, or preside over labor cases, or decide software patents. But when it comes to surveillance, the composition of the bench is entirely in his hands and so, as a result, is the extent to which the National Security Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation can spy on citizens.

“It really is up to these FISA judges to decide what the law means and what the NSA and FBI gets to do,” said Julian Sanchez, a privacy scholar at the Cato Institute. “So Roberts is single handedly choosing the people who get to decide how much surveillance we’re subject to.”

Cannabis Capitalism

Mark Thornton blames the potency of pot on Prohibition:

I don’t see a problem with more potent pot. I don’t disagree that Prohibition is the main force behind it – but it means you can also inhale less for more effect. The double standards are again revealing. Who is complaining that we have bourbon in the alcohol market alongside beer? A couple of Jäger shots and I’m buzzed. Six beers and I’m bloated and useless. I’d rather do the shots. Vince Beiser examines the regulatory choices Washington state is facing as it sets up a legal marijuana industry:

One route Washington could take would be to issue lots of grower licenses and limit farm size to end up with a large number of small producers. Call it the mom-and-pop, artisanal-weed option. That would generate competition, which keeps prices low, encourages innovation, and makes it much more difficult for the industry to accumulate the kind of political power wielded by, say, Big Tobacco—the three companies that control 85 percent of the national cigarette market. On the other hand, it’s more difficult to monitor and regulate hundreds of small businesses than a few big ones. “And,” points out [Mark] Kleiman [who is advising Washington state on marijuana policy], “they’re not making as much, so each of them has a stronger incentive to push stuff out the back door”—into the black market.

If the state instead allowed only a few big growers to operate, they might get rich enough to become powerful players in state politics. But their centralized operations would be much easier to keep tabs on, and they would have a powerful incentive to abide by the law. “Otherwise they could lose their oligopoly position, which is basically a license to print money,” says Kleiman.