Together we will beat cancer. Proud of Miss Gibraltar contestants #NoMakeUpSelfieForCancer pic.twitter.com/tGH5Y5UmZF
— James Neish (@JamesNeish) March 20, 2014
A viral cancer-awareness campaign of #nomakeup selfies raised 8 million euros. Many participants were caught off-guard by the positive response to their bare faces, something that Alex Jones (not that Alex Jones) found encouraging:
[A] recent paper of mine, in press at the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, and carried at Bangor University, examined just this question. I wondered whether makeup use, like dieting or gym workout behaviours, affected perceptions of attractiveness from same and opposite sex peers. An ideal way of testing this was to examine how much makeup is considered optimally attractive. After all, if women’s ideas of what looks good to others is accurate, then everyone should find their makeup optimally attractive, right? …
The results were clear. Both women and men found faces with up to 40% less makeup than the models applied themselves the most attractive, showing a clear agreement on their opinions for cosmetics. Less was simply better. However, when they considered the preferences of others, the women and men in our study indicated that they thought other people found more cosmetics more attractive, and this was especially true when considering the preferences of other men. However, this couldn’t be further from the truth. The sample of men in our study consistently chose less makeup as more attractive, while at the same time indicating that they thought their peers would find more makeup more attractive.