Quote for the Day II

Ahmad

"Iran has dropped its pretense of benign intent. It has used the passing time to disperse, diversify, conceal, and protect its nuclear centers. But [the U.S.] cannot prevent this through military means‚Äîunless it is willing to commit itself to all-out war. Realism about Iran starts with throwing out any plans to bomb," ‚Äî James Fallows, the Atlantic. Fallows was one of the few writers to predict the chaos in Iraq and to warn against it. He’s earned our trust. Read what he has to say.

(Photo: Irna/AFP/Getty Images).

First Inning

I’m so sorry. It turns out I "inned" the new editor of "Out," which is quite an achievement. My sourceAaron_hicklinx275 was a very good one, and I emailed Aaron Hicklin to double-check, and should have waited longer to hear from the horse’s mouth. Aaron emailed a little while ago to say:

"I’m flattered that you should name-check me in your column, especially as I’ve long been a fan of your writing, and want to bring some anti-consensual ideas into Out, but I must correct one possibly irrelevant misapprehension: I’m very definitely gay, however much I may be accused of acting straight (five years of editing Gear, as senior and then executive editor could easily leave that impression)."

D’oh! Well, the good news is a) his orientation did not seem to be a factor in his being hired, and b) these days, someone can be rightly upset that he has been publicly outed as straight. It could ruin his career! Still, my apologies. I never meant to offend. I know how hard it is to be a public heterosexual these days, and I apologize for throwing the accusation around without proper double-checking.

The Jailing of a Journalist

The disturbing story of an Iraqi cameraman thrown in Abu Ghraib by U.S. soldiers as a terrorist suspect, and ultimately cleared, after a year, because there was not a shred of evidence against him. The Pentagon had first given off-the-record briefings accusing him of being a terrorist. There must be better ways to win hearts and minds.

Republicans and Immigration

0411soto The Pew survey that dissects both Democrats and Republicans into separate groups and polls them on different issues is a fascinating insight into our current politics. It divides Republicans into three groups: "Enterprisers", "Social Conservatives" and "Pro-Government Conservatives." (On that map, I’d be an "enterpriser.") On several issues – the role of government, the power of big business, government regulation, the environment, government’s moralizing role – enterprisers are alone, and in opposition to "social cons" and "pro-gov cons." But on immigration, the enterprisers and pro-gov cons agree with the proposition that "the growing number of newcomers from other countries strengthens American society." Enterprisers back this by a margin of 53 to 38 percent; pro-gov cons back it by an even bigger margin of 62 to 31 percent. But social conservatives believe that growing immigration "threatens traditional American customs and values" by a margin of 68 to 21 percent. If you think of the Bush-Rove years as an attempt to build up the pro-government and social conservatives against the enterprisers, then immigration is a big problem for them. It unravels the Rove coalition. The more heated the debate, the more the Republicans divide. The Democrats are divided too. But because they aren’t in power, the effect is more muted.

(Photo: Dave Einsel/Getty Images)