The Legacy Of 24

Hampton Stevens takes stock of the show that just ended its eighth and final season:

24 is the most influential TV drama of all time. There isn't even a close second. No other series—not The Sopranos, The Wire, Hill Street Blues, or ER, has had a tenth of the cultural impact. There simply has never been another protagonist as loved and hated as Kiefer Sutherland's Jack Bauer—lambasted by a Brigadier General and defended by a Supreme Court judge. There has never been another television show that so profoundly and directly influenced how this nation fights a war, and discussing the significance of 24 without mentioning the political debates that swirled around the show is practically impossible.

And now a Senate candidate is explicitly blurring the line between fiction and reality by pretending he interacted with Jack Bauer during his military career. James Parker's column on 24 and Jane Mayer's profile of creator Joel Surnow from 2007 are still worth reading. Thoreau complicates the normal reading of the show's politics. But that it formed a critical backdrop to America's embrace of torture in the Bush-Cheney years is indisputable.

If California Legalizes Cannabis …

… Scott Morgan expects that the Obama administration won't stand in the way:

Sure, we'll continue to hear the drug czar whining from time to time about the perils of legalization, but if Californians decide to go through with it, don't expect a federal occupation in the streets of Oaksterdam. Obama's base is decidedly supportive of marijuana reform, thus he has nothing to gain and a considerable hassle to endure should he be foolish enough to stand between Californians and their cannabis.

Of course, while I highly doubt Obama will interfere in any meaningful way with the legalization effort in California, I am curious as all hell what he'll say about it if asked.

The last time he was asked, he treated the entire question as a joke.

Face Of The Day

100965272_

A Lebanese commando kills a chicken during a demonstration by the Lebanese Army to students at a school in the southern port city of Sidon on May 26, 2010. The army holds demonstration at schools and colleges across the country hoping to attract recruits and to show off the country's army following years of civil and sectarian strife. By Mahmoud Zayat/AFP/Getty Images.

DC And NYC, Arm In Arm

TNC has more qualms with Conor’s attacks on New York. E.D. Kain thinks Friedersdorf’s criticisms of both NYC and DC are off the mark:

The question to me is not whether centers of power or culture or economy are good or bad, but whether there are appropriate checks and balances on their influence, and whether that influence then results in (cultural/political/economic) growth across the country or whether it simply saps the rest of the country of its resources. Is New York robbing the rest of the country of its art and culture? Probably not. Likely quite the contrary occurs. Wall Street, on the other hand, is a lot more culpable when it comes to our financial situation and the drain bad finance has placed on people on Main Street as it were – and there is certainly a problem with letting one industry, largely centered in one city, become so dominant. And in that regard, DC is also culpable. The two cities are partners in that crime, and they really have become tyrants in a way, or at the very least the relationship between the two – between our financial sector and our political elite on both left and right – has become incestuous and unsustainable.

On that I agree. I’ve lived in DC for twenty years or more and I always find myself defending it –  usually in Manhattan. Its theater and fine art are world-class; it’s easy to get around everywhere on a bike; we have marriage equality and medical marijuana; there’s the Great Ape House at the zoo (better viewing than the Senate); the men are beautiful, if somehow unsexy (the white ones, that is); the general level of education and smarts is extremely high; and vast expanses of it have nothing to do with politics at all. Really. I couldn’t live there if it were the way outsiders see it. Yes, there are a lot of future Elena Kagans, punctiliously networking their twin-set way to total elite acceptance.

But there are also oddballs and eccentrics, musicians and actors, potheads and tech-nerds, old soldiers and drunk spies, a litany of ethnic groups that reads like an index for the failures of American foreign policy, and more folks straight out of Middle America (and not always escaping it) than most places I’ve lived in. I’m a rural boy at heart, except for the boredom. But this is the best way of being urban in a very green and lush and low-storied gully.

The swamp thing is why I found myself a place in Provincetown years ago. I figured if I had only a few more years to live, I sure wasn’t going to endure another unbreathable pressure-cooker atmosphere for three months of the year (but the late afternoon thunderstorms had their moments). I’m not sure if I would have survived DC intact for decades without the annual safety-valve of Ptown. But Ptown has the same combo as DC: in the summer, it’s essentially a tiny slice of deeply urban living on a deserted sandbar. And sixteen years later, I find myself today on a ferry to the little town of award-winning fudge and mannish women. In fact, as I write this, I can just see the awful Pilgrims Monument on the horizon as the ferry approaches the harbor.

At last, as a friend of mine once said, some normal people.

And my husband and my beagles. It’s been so long.

The Line-Item Veto

Obama is trying to revive it. Bernstein explains the significance:

[W]hat it's about is transferring influence from the Hill to the White House, not biasing the process against spending.

Damn. My fiscal conservatism is getting itchier with these guys. If the Brits can do this after a deeply divided election, why can't Obama offer his own fricking plan to cut the debt over ten years?

It’s Rough Out There

William Galston highlights a revealing study:

[S]ometimes it takes a new angle of vision to make you see just how difficult things are. My “aha” moment came over the weekend, when I read a recent survey that tracked the fate of a large sample of individuals who were unemployed as of last August. Here a summary:

Of the 908-person sample, 67 percent remained unemployed but were still looking for work, and an additional 12 percent had given up and dropped out of the labor force. Only 21 percent had found jobs (only 13 percent full-time) and were currently employed. A stunning 28 percent of the newly reemployed had been looking for work for more than one year, and 6 percent for more than two years. Fifty-five percent accepted a pay cut in their new jobs; 13 percent took a cut larger than one-third of their previous salary.

My "aha" moment on this came from reading Don Peck.