“I Lost My Impulse For Self-Preservation”

Meth-face9

A reader writes:

Mine is a cautionary tale of the pernicious nature of meth, especially in relationship to the transmission of HIV.

By the time I was 17 in 1984, I had been having sex for several years. Whether as a result of luck or the grace of God (I say this as a Catholic agnostic), I did not contract HIV despite quite a number of sexual partners. However, during the summer of 1984, I was about to engage in potentially dangerous sexual behavior when my older sexual partner scolded me and taught me what was and wasn't safer sexual practice. I cried from humiliation, but that gentleman probably saved my life.

When I moved to NYC in the early 1990s, I volunteered for ACT UP, interned for alternate gay magazines, and became a buddy for Gay Men's Health Crisis, helping to take care of men dying from AIDS. I saw firsthand HIV's and AIDS's physical and emotional devastation. I am a smart, Ivy League educated guy (I think I might have been at Harvard as an undergraduate when you were a graduate student) and knew what needed to be done to prevent my contracting the virus.

Unfortunately, I also have always had a strain of self-destructiveness. However, despite my impulse to undermine myself, I had always been able to prevent myself from doing irreparable harm to myself. A suburban kid at heart, I flirted with more marginal behavior but made sure to separate, even compartmentalize, such behavior from my more respectable veneer of a life, which included work on Wall Street. All that changed when I decided – despite my full knowledge of its dangerous nature – to try meth.

During my 20s, I smoked pot every so often. I took Ecstasy maybe one to three times a year. I hated snorting coke. People would use it around me and I would avoid it because I didn't like how it made me feel and I hated losing my erection. Up until about my 30th birthday, I refused to try meth or smoke coke. Unfortunately, during a very emotionally vulnerable time in my life, I stupidly smoked coke. My biochemical wiring was immediately altered. For the first time in my life, I craved a drug. Within a few weeks, I got myself to 12 step meetings because I knew where such use could lead me. I was a binge user who would use once every few months. I won't say I had it under control but I was able to hold down a job, despite these occasional relapses.

I might have continued this way for several years but I eventually added meth into the mix. Eventually, I partied with nothing but meth. I lost my job on Wall Street and used my severance package to live a life of meth and sex. Meth gave me the artificial delusion that I was deeply and passionately connected to my sexual partners – a feeling I found nearly impossible to feel when I was sober. And even if I got rejected while on meth, I didn't feel it. I could move on to my next partner and any rejection was a distant memory. Meth freed me from those nagging feelings of self-doubt and self-hatred I had suffered since I was a child. It was far more powerful and seemingly effective than years of therapy and anti-depressants.

However, along with losing my crippling self-consciousness, I also lost my impulse for self-preservation. Despite years of being a top, I found myself wanting to bottom and to do so without a condom. In the summer of 2004 – 20 years after learning what I needed to do to prevent my contracting HIV – I seroconverted.  I had for years been nearly a hypochondriac when it came to feeling shitty, suspecting it might be my having contracting HIV. I was so strung out on meth that I didn't even realize that the fever and sore throat, which wouldn't respond to antibiotics, were indications of my having contracted the disease.

Five and a half years later, I am healthy as a result of a great physician and anti-viral regiment. I still battle my addiction and find myself still feeling unsure of myself on a daily basis. I have struggled to not live in isolation and remain a productive part of society. I battle the overwhelming desire to not use meth and know that the recidivism rate of meth users is high because, unlike other drugs (including cocaine), the brain does not naturally start producing dopamine and serotonin after meth use. I try not to live in regret and try my best to treat myself with compassion, if for no other reason than my knowing that beating myself over the head will not make my life any better.

I lived a charmed life and felt that I would not fall victim to the dangers of meth as others around me had. Such feelings of invincibility led to where I am today.

The SCOTUS Decision, Ctd

Frum wants another form of campaign finance reform:

As Peter Wallison argues in his great book on party finance, the real evil of American politics is that politicians must beg interest groups for the money to finance their campaigns. What we need is not “less money” and CERTAINLY not less speech – but more distance between donor and recipient. The mechanism for that is the political party. Reformers should be focusing on lifting limits on the flow of money from parties to candidates and restoring the role of the parties as the funders of campaigns. Instead of Candidate Smith asking Donor Gonzalez for money – and Donor Gonzalez asking for a favor in return – party chairman Robinson will ask thousands of donors for money on behalf of a slate of candidates, who will never know precisely whose gift was directed to them. That step will diminish corruption and the appearance of corruption.

The outlawing of speech by corporate groups on the other hand only diminishes liberty.

Dissent Of The Day

A reader writes:

You wrote:

… "[Obama's] major problems right now are a) an apoplectic and incoherent opposition that feels it is doing something by randomly harnessing populist frustration in a recession and playing the Rovian politics which is all they know and b) a useless bunch of disorganized morons and cowards who make up the Congressional Democrats"…

With all due respect, this totally ignores the fact that 100% of Senate Democrats support healthcare reform (all 59 of them), but because of the antiquated, undemocratic filibuster rule, which is being used as a daily weapon by Senate Republicans, we aren't able to pass it.  As a Chief of Staff to a Democratic Senator, I can't tell you how dispiriting it is to read stuff like what you wrote–and which I read on other weblogs and hear from my friends…

I understand the anger at not passing healthcare reform–hell, I feel it, too–but folks' anger should be focused on 1) the tool that is being used to obstruct passage, and 2) those who are using the tool!  There needs to be a movement to change this rule–and believe me, it won't be easy (it's my understanding it takes 67 votes to change Senate rules)–but you can play an important role in helping folks understand the need to do so.  However, calling us a "useless bunch of disorganized morons and cowards" because of our inability to reach 60 votes–a very difficult goal to reach when you don't have a single Republican willing to support you–is neither fair nor accurate.

A Question Of Nerve

OBAMATimSloan:AFP:Getty The one thing the Cheneyites and Rovians have is nerve. They assert everything with utter certainty and confidence even though their record is appalling. Conservatives and liberals of doubt don't think or act that way. We are aware that we can be wrong; we try and analyze our own mistakes; we try to give a fair hearing to the other side.

This can lead to an assumption that we are wusses. Or weak. But of course the opposite is true. It is the strong who can entertain doubt and the weak who cannot. Cheney is not a strong man; he is a bully hiding his own rank moral and political and national security failure.

The whole point of the Obama candidacy – why he matters – is that he is a liberal of doubt. But he also showed in the campaign that this was a strength. And when he needed to, he revealed a ruthlessness and radicalism and won.

And that is why this moment is so vital.

He must not just rally the House Dems, he must rally the country. He must bring us back in. And we must back him up. This is not just about a centrist comprehensive health reform bill. It is about defeating an entire brand of cowardly, cynical, spin cycle bullshit that has brought this country down and promoting an adult and reasonable discourse that grapples with our problems.

That's what we elected him for. If he caves now, if he does not mount a huge effort to retain this bill, he will have surrendered on that critical ground. He will have lost his nerve. And if we cave now, all that work we did, all that energy, all that hope, will be squandered as the old politics gets its hands on our collective throats again.

I refuse to believe he has given up; and I refuse to believe we will. This moment is too important as a fulcrum on which this country's future hangs for him or us to give up now. The polls show a divided country. At this point in the adminstrations of my idols, Reagan and Thatcher, the polls were overwhelmingly against them. They faced them down and won.

Mr President, fight. Show you're a fighter. And start to enjoy it.

The Snopes Trial

A scene from yesterday:

Boies: You are saying here that after same-sex marriage was legalized, the Netherlands legalized incest and polygamy?” Tam: “Yeah, look at the date. Polygamy happened afterward. “Who told you that? Where did you get that idea,” Boies asked incredulously.

“It’s the Internet,” he said. “Another person in the organization found it and he showed me it … I looked at the document and I thought it was true.”

Polygamy is not legal in the Netherlands, but the idea that it is became an urban myth of sorts in 2005 after a man and two women signed a private “cohabitation contract” while wearing wedding garb. Consensual incest between adults is no longer prosecuted in the Netherlands, but close relatives are not allowed to wed.

For Horserace Addicts

Nate Silver unveils his Senate race ranking model:

Between the surprise in Massachusetts, and races like California and Indiana which are potentially coming into play, there's about a 6-7 percent chance that Republicans could actually take control of the Senate, and another 6 percent chance or so that they could wind up with a 50-50 split. On the other hand, there's still a 7-8 percent chance that the Democrats could regain their 60th seat if the national environment shifts back in their direction.