Category: Hewitt Award Nominee

"Iranian agents have successfully infiltrated American think-tanks, universities, and our political system as part of a plot to keep the United States from attacking the Islamic regime as it continues to expand terrorism worldwide and pursue its nuclear weapons and missile programs. The infiltration goal is to mold American opinion and create doubt about the advisability of attacking Iran's nuclear facilities — all part of a longstanding strategy to pull the strings of America and the West," – Reza Khalil, The American Thinker.

"Yes, Obama has been very tough on al-Qaeda overseas, but that has made it far easier for him to embrace the Muslim Brotherhood (both overseas and here at home). This makes perfect sense, actually: the Muslim Brotherhood is to al Qaeda as Alinsky was to the Weathermen — the bloodthirsty and ultimately ineffective Islamists are giving way to the sophisticated, competent, highly effective Islamists," – Andy McCarthy, National Review.

"[Obama] has encouraged Arab street revolts against corrupt autocracies. Long-standing American allies, such as former Egyptian strongman Hosni Mubarak, were abandoned. Yet, contrary to his simplistic narrative of freedom fighters battling tyranny, Mr. Obama has helped pave the way for the triumph of Shariah democracy – the drive to establish a global Islamic caliphate. At his core, Mr. Obama is a radical secular progressive. Like all multiculturalists, he believes in one seminal myth: Mass poverty and oppression in the Third World is America’s fault. Hence, he champions anti-colonial 'liberation movements' – the uprisings of repressed peoples, especially those in the Muslim world, chafing under authoritarian rule. Yet he never bothers to ask: What comes next? What kind of regime replaces the previous one? The results are often even worse," – Jeffrey T. Kuhner, The Washington Times.

The movement on the right from celebrating Arab democracy under Bush to fearing it under Obama is a real shift. It reveals the shallow veneer of neoconservatism's defense of Arab democracy when compared with its deep attachment to Greater Israel.

"There’s something sick about an administration which is so pro-Islamic that it can’t even tell the truth about the people who are trying to kill us. … I think we can look into the mind of a president in the speed and thoroughness with which they have disowned their own people," - Newt Gingrich, who recently said that defeating Obama is a "duty of national security."

by Chris Bodenner

"[Killing bin Laden] wouldn't have happened if [Obama] had his way, and that can be proven, as well, on tape," – Sean Hannity. Read here to see just how insane that statement really is.

"This is a president who said I'm not going to be a divider, I'm going to be a uniter, and running on the politics of division and envy is – to me it's almost un-American," – John Boehner, on the day of the State of the Union.

"Let [Romney]  make this challenge: 'I'll release my tax returns when Barack Obama releases his college transcripts and the copy of his admission records to show whether he got any loans as a foreign student. When he releases that, talk to me about my tax returns,'" – Mike Huckabee.

Foreign student? Will Fox correct … oh … never mind … I forgot they aren't "actual journalists."

"Order a hit on a president in order to preserve Israel's existence. Think about it. If I have thought of this Tom Clancy-type scenario, don't you think that this almost unfathomable idea has been discussed in Israel's most inner circles? Another way of putting "three" in perspective goes something like this: How far would you go to save a nation comprised of seven million lives … Jews, Christians and Arabs alike? You have got to believe, like I do, that all options are on the table," – Andrew Adler, publisher of the Atlanta Jewish Times. He has now apologized.

Telling that a pro-Greater Israel fanatic thinks it's conceivable for the "most inner circles" of an ally to attempt to assassinate the president of the United States.

"[I]t goes too far, as Perry did, to accuse the administration of having 'disdain' for the military. The definition of disdain is a 'feeling of contempt for someone or something regarded as unworthy or inferior.' Rather, the president simply puts the military, repeatedly, as a lower priority than the rest of the government. If not disdain, it is at the very least an inversion of priorities. Domestic spending grows astronomically; he slashes the military budget. He faces a tough reelection effort and his base is restive; he sets arbitrary withdrawal deadlines that threaten the gains in Iraq and Afghanistan.

It is not enough for a commander in chief to go to Memorial Day celebrations, or focus on health care in the VA. For men and women risking their lives for us, their safety and morale should come first. In this administration is just isn’t so," – Jennifer Rubin, WaPo.

The vileness never ends, does it? Ending one war, and winning another, doesn't help the troops morale? And remember the bulk of the defense cuts are because of the GOP's refusal to raise taxes along with steep spending cuts last summer. Sequestration was not Obama's first choice.

(Photo: US President Barack Obama (R) salutes during the dignified transfer of Sergeant Dale R. Griffin of Terre Haute, Indiana, at Dover Air Force Base in Dover, Delaware, October 29, 2009. Obama traveled to the base to meet the plane carrying the bodies of 18 US personnel killed in Afghanistan on October 26, including Griffin. By Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images.)

"I think, in fact, what President Obama is doing is something that America's enemies–the Taliban, al Qaeda–have been unable to do, which is to decimate the fighting capability of this nation," – Liz Cheney, Fox News.