Yglesias Award Nominee

"The unusually uncertain political environment may be retarding employment. The reason is not that this is a presidential election year, but that the two political parties seem so far apart regarding policy. The Republicans in Congress will for understandable political reasons do everything they can to prevent the economy from improving before, and possibly after, the election, because they are committed to the position that Obama is responsible for the high unemployment rate," – Richard Posner.

Further thoughts on his conservative intellectual honesty here.

Hewitt Award Nominee

"The fact is, it’s not a question of whether can Mitt Romney win. The statement is, Mitt Romney has to win for the sake of the very idea of America. Mitt Romney has to win for liberty and freedom. We have to put an end to this Barack Obama presidency before it puts an end to our way of life in America," – Reince Priebus, RNC Chair.

A glossary of Dish Awards can be found here.

Yglesias Award Nominee

"We live in a time where the sheep must lead the lost shepherds. But my hope is that when those confused old shepherds have passed away, a new generation of Catholic priests, bishops, cardinals, and popes will include openly gay, straight, single and married men and women—people who will not be interested in sticking their noses in Catholic bedrooms but will instead be focused on amplifying the unconditional love of Jesus. I hope I live to see that day. I would not mind receiving the blessing from such a pope and being asked again to step up to that pulpit on the high altar of St. Peter’s Basilica to proclaim the truth of Jesus with the voice he gave me for exactly that purpose," – Father Tony Adams.

(Hat tip: JoeMyGod)

Yglesias Award Nominee

"I've become less conservative since the Republican Party started becoming goofy," – Richard Posner.

One of the less observed features of the last few years has, in fact, been the intellectual honesty of conservatives like Posner or Greenspan or Bartlett or Frum. Each one of them, unlike so many who pass for conservative intellectuals these days, has his own view of the world, formed by independent thinking and study – often in the face of institutional liberal disdain. And they have shrewdly concluded that the last few years have shown that unregulated capitalism can be a serious problem, that markets do not automatically govern themselves, that the ideology of three decades ago might need revisiting in the face of the catastrophe of the Bush-Cheney years, which all but exploded the logic of neoconservatism and its domestic partner-in-crime, supply side economics. One was voodoo foreign policy, the other voodoo economics. Reality – simple empirical reality – exposed their glaring flaws.

An actual conservative will learn from this and adjust. The raving loons in the GOP base – precisely because they have no serious thinking behind them – will double-down on their fantasies, empowered by partisan hatred. And that's why the GOP needs to be defeated this fall. For the sake of an honest conservatism.

Yglesias Award Nominee

"The economy is of course important. But voters want to hear what Romney is going to do about the economy. He can "speak about" how bad the economy is all he wants—though Americans are already well aware of the economy's problems—but doesn't the content of what Romney has to say matter? What is his economic growth agenda? His deficit reform agenda? His health care reform agenda? His tax reform agenda? His replacement for Dodd-Frank? No need for any of that, I suppose the Romney campaign believes. Just need to keep on "speaking about the economy."  

The Romney campaign will answer that they're imitating Bill Clinton in 1992, who famously focused on "the economy, stupid." But Bill Clinton was a full spectrum presidential candidate, with detailed policy proposals on welfare reform, health care, education, and foreign policy," – Bill Kristol, comparing Romney with Dukakis and Kerry.

Yglesias Award Nominee

"[W]hile a vote to blow up ObamaCare would have felt good today, it’d also spell trouble for valued institutions in the long run. In response to SCOTUS pushback in the ’30s, FDR attempted to pack the court (and newly succeeded). And today, the calls are back to get rid of the filibuster, which stands with the Electoral College as the last barriers between our Founding Fathers’ vision and popular democracy. And trust me. In popular democracy, responsibility and liberty don’t prevail. Ask the Jacobins.

So despite the temptation to hammer ObamaCare with budget reconciliation, cool your jets. Lose the battles if it means you may win the war," – Justin Green, The Daily Caller.

Von Hoffmann Award Nominee

A reader calls me out:

I love the Dish and all, but sorry – citing an American Bar Association survey is hardly "calling" the outcome. If you had come out in March and said, "Roberts will be the deciding vote in upholding the ACA," then that would have been calling it. Besides, what about your statement published at Reason last week?

[SCOTUS] will strike down the mandate alone.

If anything, you should nominate yourself up for a Von Hoffmann award on this one.

Busted. I'm not clairvoyant. And Reason forced me to predict something. But in the original, I cited the Dish, not me personally. And we did air and link to the argument that Roberts would save the ACA.

(A glossary of all the Dish Awards can be found here.)

Yglesias Award Nominee

"I think there is a lot of whistling past the graveyard going on among conservatives who think that Obamacare is really in the political crosshairs now, and indeed, could lead to the defeat of the president’s reelection effort. I worry that the opposite is true. Sure, opponents who care a lot about the constitutionality and policy propriety of the ACA are very upset and motivated to defeat the president. But they already were. For the relatively uninvolved, the message of the Roberts ruling, despite the justice’s protests to the contrary, is that Obamacare is A-okay. That will increase the law’s popularity — just as Roe v. Wade did with abortion.  Alas," – Wesley J Smith, NRO.

Malkin Award Nominee

"Let's talk about [US Supreme Court Chief Justice John] Roberts. I'm going to tell you something that you're not going to hear anywhere else, that you must pay attention to. It's well known that Roberts, unfortunately for him, has suffered from epileptic seizures. Therefore he has been on medication. Therefore neurologists will tell you that medication used for seizure disorders, such as epilepsy, can introduce mental slowing, forgetfulness and other cognitive problems. And if you look at Roberts' writings you can see the cognitive disassociation in what he is saying," – radio host Michael Savage.

Moore Award Nominee

"Okay, we all know that there are major problems with some of their op ed columnists. First off, there’s David Brooks, that shallow, insufferably smug propagandist for the 1 percenters whose only interesting moments occur when he drops the genial nice-guy pose and shows us his snarling, viciously punitive, anti-working people side. Then there’s Maureen Dowd who, half the time, reads like she has the emotional maturity of Paris Hilton (though I will say that Modo’s recent columns about Jerry Sandusky and the Catholic Church have been spot-on). Finally, there’s Ross Douthat, a know-nothing hack with serial killer eyes whose creepy, misogynist sexual politics are positively medieval, and whose column has become one of my favorite hate-reads ever," – Kathleen Geier, Washington Monthly.

Whatever happened to the art of insult?