A reader writes:
A salient fact: I lived on Comm Ave between Gloucester and Hereford, a few blocks from both explosions, so I feel like I have “skin” in this story.
Why did they shut the city down? One answer: MBTA. If they had gotten on the the MBTA they could’ve been in Providence in a matter of minutes (less than 2 horus), or in a car poised at far flung T station and into the the NH or VT wilderness. The particular problem of Watertown and Cambridge is the variety of transport options available to the bombers to slink through police lines. Shutting down these options was the quickest way to limit their escape routes, same with forcing taxis off the streets.
Was this hugely inconvenient, yes. Hugely expensive, no doubt. But those that wrote that at worse they might have detained/hurt/killed no more than a few dozen innocents are misguided. What if the bombers intention was to hijack a plane? Or detonate a bomb on an Amtrak train? Also, I ask them: if this was YOUR town or city, what would you want?
I can’t imagine a better outcome of a horribly nightmarish situation for the people of Boston and surroundings. As a dyed-in-the-wool lib I can’t believe I’m going to write this, but: thank you to the local, state, and federal authorities for containing this situation before it got much worse.



