Category: Old Dish

Here’s the mayor of New Orleans on the radio yesterday. His verdict on the feds: “They’re thinking small.”

Kevin Drum wants to say that the difference between conservatives and liberals is that liberals believe in funding organizations like FEMA or the Corps of Engineers and conservatives don’t. Nuh-huh. Real conservatives believe that the state should do a few things that no one else can do – defense, decent public education, police, law and order among the most obvious – and leave the rest to individuals. Funding FEMA and having a superb civil defense are very much part of conservatism’s real core. It’s when government decides to reshape society, redistribute wealth, socially engineer, and take over functions that the private sector can do just as well that conservatives draw the line. The reason I’m mad as hell over Katrina is precisely because I’m a conservative and this kind of thing is exactly what government is for. Bush in this sense is not now and never has been a conservative. A man who explodes government spending but can’t run a war or organize basic civil defense is simply a fiscally reckless incompetent. If this were a parliamentary system, we’d have a vote of no confidence. Instead we have three years of more peril.

Sometimes an emailer says it better than I ever could. Read this. Read all of it. You know why I endorsed Kerry last time? Not because I liked Kerry or ever dreamed of backing him. I’m not a liberal. I’m not a Bush-hater. I backed the war. Initially, I trusted and supported this president to the hilt at a time of great danger. But I was forced to back Kerry of all people because Bush’s gross incompetence at a time of national peril was simply too great a risk to continue. Now we have the proof:

“I’ve considered myself a socially libertarian, fiscally conservative Republican for a very long time. I got along with the idea that I wasn’t going to get a whole lot of help. College wouldn’t be free. Job training would cost money and time. And I’m probably a decent example of up-from-not-much.

But after watching what’s happening in New Orleans-an American city that I’ve loved, visited and have always wanted to return to – I can’t ever vote for these people again.

Being a Republican means that you expect the government to do just a couple things for you and nothing else. Build a road. Defend us from enemies, foreign and domestic. Stuff that would be a lot less organized if we all had to do it ourselves. Everything else is just gravy.

And as we poured money into Department of Homeland Security, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, I thought, “Right on,” because some of that money’s bound to fall on my head.

Well, something else would fall on my head first.

I work for the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. And that means that if something really catastrophic happens in MY city, and they ask me to stick around, that’s the job. We have A and B teams and I’m a disaster recovery specialist on Team A. I’ve drawn up plans with names like Drawbridge and Smoldering Crater.

Here’s what these people would do for me.

They would leave me there to die.

Look at the facts. There’s no coordination on the ground right now. The city has no fresh water, no electricity, no services. The floodwater has so much oil and toxins in it that it’s flammable.

In psychology they have what is called a fight-or-flight response. When faced with danger, do you subdue it or do you flee? Some of it has to do with risk assessment, but in this case, there is no flight. There is nowhere to run. So flight means die. If my choice was to pull a pistol on a truck driver or Nat, Jarren, Jayson, or any of you dies, that’s no choice at all.

I’m not talking about the looters grabbing big-screen televisions and basketball hoops. I’m talking about the ones that are chest-deep in water carrying bottled water and diapers. You can’t tell me for three days to be patient, the bus is coming, and they’re piling up bodies in the street median.

We have known that this sort of disaster could occur for a century. Hell, the tour bus driver told me about it on the plantation tour. This means that we have been able to envision the stark reality of this occurring for a week-the newspapers all said the storm would hit New Orleans last Thursday.

A week to get buses? A week to get fishing boats? Trucks? This is the United States! I read someone who said, “All the people who weren’t bedridden, or had money, or had cars left. The people that are left had none of those things.”

There are people tonight who are going to sleep on overpasses for the fourth straight night. There are prisoners who will do the same. There are people dying at a convention center because no one will tell them that no one is coming for them, and the National Guard is protecting the kitchens. There are police officers who are turning in their badges because they’ve lost everything, have no guidance, and don’t want to be shot by a looter.

There are people tonight inside a concrete domed stadium with holes in the roof and no air conditioning who were told the buses are coming today, and they might, or they might not. There is no food. There is no water. There are bodies floating through the neighborhoods.

In the UNITED STATES.

Some people say that you can’t hold the President responsible for this. Oh, yes you can. Because when he looked over at John Ashcroft after the jets hit the towers and said, “I want you to make sure this never happens again,” it was not meant to be specific to “no more planes hitting large buildings on the East Coast, right, boss.” It was meant that no American should have to run for his life through an American city. While Americans may perish in a senseless, unforeseen disaster, we’d save the ones we could.

And the Cabinet appointees were mushwits and he could barely speak a complete sentence and we’re sending people overseas for God knows how long to help people who are indifferent at worst and hostile at best, but they were going to protect us. In 2004, that’s all a lot of us needed. Well right now, it’s obvious that they can’t.

Ask yourself this: What if Al-Qaeda blew up the levees instead of the hurricane? Would the response have been any different?

No. It wouldn’t. That city flooded in a day. And if it were Las Vegas, I would have been in some operations center watching people try to decide who gets to starve to death and who gets to get on a bus to Los Angeles or Phoenix. And there would be no certainty that I’d be on that bus in time to protect my wife and kids.

But one thing sure would have been different.

They wouldn’t have had a whole week to sort it out and know what’s coming. They were supposed to KNOW this already. It will have been FOUR YEARS next weekend since someone probably said, “Hey, what if…”

And for that, the whole stack of them should be fired.

I’ve had it. I’m done. And if the other bunch of assholes can’t figure out that what’s important is that babies don’t starve to death here (and I’m not talking some metaphorical goo-goo thing with school lunches and welfare, but real, actual starving) and we get people out of harm’s way, we’ll get rid of them too. And so on.

Because this is about leadership, not about bitching on CNN how no one’s in charge, or listening to Peggy Noonan furrow her brow at the Governor’s performance, or bragging that we’ve sent in one National Guardsman for every 200 people, or actually having the audacity to say that “we had no idea the levees would break.”

Today, I saw my country favorably compared to Indonesia and Thailand, (always our traditional benchmarks of infrastructural success) while the elderly die of thirst in the street. We sneered at France when this happened during a heat wave.

No more.”

“We just learned about that today, and so I have directed that we have all available resources to get to that convention center to make sure that they have the food and water, the medical care that they need,” – Michael Brown, head of FEMA, yesterday. Brown apparently doesn’t get CNN. I wonder how long before president Bush gives him a presidential Medal of Freedom.

I have to say that one of the worst potential repercussions of this calamity and the Bush administration’s response is to show how utterly unprepared this country still is for some kind of terror attack, how little coordination there is between local and federal authorities, how evacuation plans are chaotic, how we have a president divorced from reality, and a Congress more interested in doling out pork than protecting the country. The message is this: come and get us. If al Qaeda had blown up the levees, can you imagine the chaos?

“Moments define a presidency. Bill Clinton did a lot of good things in his two terms, but his legacy was sealed with these eight words: “I did not have sexual relations with that woman.” I always assumed President Bush’s presidential legacy would turn on his post-9/11performance, regardless of the mess in Iraq, the floundering economy, and all the other warts. Now I’m starting to wonder. As New Orleans spins out of control, a righteous storm of rage and disbelief seems to be spreading across the country. If 9/11 was the president’s moment of ultimate strength, it’s beginning to look like this is his moment of ultimate impotence.”

“In the aftermath of the disaster in New Orleans, I honestly thought we would be wowed by the federal response. This seemed the perfect opportunity for the administration to showcase the training Homeland Security has coordinated over the past four years. The disaster, after all, is not so different from a terrorist attack. A dirty bomb would leave much the same refugee concerns. And while there had been much noise over the possiblity of terrorists blowing up dams, it couldn’t have escaped the authorities’ attention that someone could blow a hole in New Orleans’ levees. But I sit back now and watch the devastation escalate, and I keep asking myself: What exactly have they been doing for the past four years?” I’m asking the same question; and my anger wells up.

James Taranto is doing his usual best to defend anything the Bush administration does and points out that the deployment in Iraq is not a reason for the lack of troops to restore order in new Orleans. He cites a NRO article that makes this point:

Take the Army for example. There are 1,012,000 soldiers on active duty, in the Reserves, or in the National Guard. Of them, 261,000 are deployed overseas in 120 countries. Iraq accounts for 103,000 soldiers, or 10.2 percent of the Army.

That’s all? Yes, 10.2 percent. That datum is significant in itself, a good one to keep handy the next time someone talks about how our forces are stretched too thin, our troops are at the breaking point, and so forth. If you add in Afghanistan (15,000) and the support troops in Kuwait (10,000) you still only have 12.6 percent.

So where are the rest? 751,000 (74.2 percent) are in the U.S. About half are active duty, and half Guard and Reserve. The Guard is the real issue of course – the Left wants you to believe that the country has been denuded of its citizen soldiers, and that Louisiana has suffered inordinately because Guardsmen and women who would have been available to be mobilized by the state to stop looting and aid in reconstruction are instead risking their lives in Iraq.

But doesn’t this indict the administration more profoundly? When we desperately need more troops in Iraq, they won’t send enough. When we desperately need troops in New Orleans, they won’t send enough. Do we really have to wait three years for a president Giuliani to actually run the country?

I’ve said before that I didn’t know whether extra funding in the last few years would have made much difference, but that the Bush administration’s record was hardly a plus. Confirmation here from the Chicago Tribune.

Just asking.