EMAIL OF THE DAY

“Calm down, there, tiger. I’m no fan of Santorum, but what exactly is so wrong with those excerpts you linked to? They are certainly not worthy of the mullah comparison.
Are children better off when one parent stays home to raise them, as opposed to a daycare provider? I’d be surprised if you believed that they are not. Is the feminist movement partly to blame for more mothers leaving the home to pursue professional careers at the expense of their children? Of course. Even if you disagree, is that such a radical or nonsensical position to hold? On number three, Is college the right path for everyone? I know many people who have been pushed needlessly into college only to end up with tens of thousands of dollars in debt and a tough job market to deal with. Of course, one will have more opportunities with a college education, but do you really think the solution to every single mother’s woes is to pack up and go to school?
Seriously, I think you are overreacting here. Just remember to take a deep breath and count to ten from now on whenever you see Santorum’s name.”

WHO CHANGED MARRIAGE?

The heterosexuals, of course! Stephanie Coontz will find few dissenters on the social right. The revolution in civil marriage – in which it became about love, not property, in which women and men were equal, in which children were not necessary – all occurred before the gay revolution. Since marriage has already been redefined to make the exclusion of gays logically absurd, the campaign against letting gays into the human family necessarily raises the suspicion of mere animus. It’s not bigotry to say that these are the rules that govern civil marriage and too bad if you can’t live up to them (i.e. procreation, or traditional gender roles). But it is suspicious when you abolish all those rules for straights and then use the old rules to bar gays. I don’t see how gay marriage opponents manage to get round the logic of this – except by resorting to purely religious arguments (which would invalidate most heterosexual marriages today as well), or simply reiterating the definitional case that marriage is for straights, dammit. This glaring hole on the argument must have something to do with the fact that an idea that was novel in the 1980s is now the law in several civilized countries and one state in America. Reason eventually finds a way.

FRUM ON MIERS: Another cold day in hell, but I think David Frum has a point on Harriet Miers. In my occasional interactions with the Bush brigade, I have discovered she is revered as well as feared. Not much of a paper trail; but hard as nails.

QUOTE OF THE DAY

“I stand up and challenge them when they say things that are anti-gay. I haven’t given up on them yet,” – Luis Ibarcena, a 32-year-old Spanish security guard, on why he still attends mass, despite now being married to his husband.

JOHNNY APPLE DOES MY HOME COUNTY: I grew up in the rural idyll of West Sussex. Gardening was the religion. The NYT’s Johnny Apple regularly eats and drinks his way through much of it each summer. Enjoy. He sure does.