Category: Old Dish

Behind the masked angry young Muslim immigrant men in France, there are the often beaten, raped and imprisoned Muslim women. Margaret Wente writes of their plight.

A blog refutes the NYT’s assertion that “the violence in France has not taken on religious overtones.” The guy’s got links.

Here’s one take on what’s going on in France:

“The disturbances are thus being portrayed as race riots caused by official discrimination and insensitivity. But this is a gross misreading of the situation. It is far more profound and intractable. What we are seeing is, in effect, a French intifada: an uprising by French Muslims against the state.
When the police tried to take back the streets, they were driven out with the demand that they leave what the protesters called the ‘occupied territories’. And far from the claim that the disturbances have been caused by French policy of segregating Muslims into ghettoes, this is a war being waged for separate development.
Some Muslims have even called for the introduction of the ancient Ottoman ‘millet’ system of autonomous development for different communities.”

That’s from British writer, Melanie Phillips, on her blog.

THE “SIXTH REPUBLIC”? An alternative view of the riots is available here. Money quote:

[T]hey are going to continue, one suspects, for as long as the political establishment presumes to deliberately and systematically misunderstand why they are occurring. At the moment, the governmental call is for ‘above all, the return of good order’; scant mention is yet to be made of even the possibility of making some effort to correct the absurd embedded racism of France’s so-called meritocratic power-structures, whose professed egalitarian ethic could not be further from practical truth. Headlines moronically blurt out: ‘how long will this go on?’ as if it is the temper tantrum of an infant, not the organised scream for help of an entire and dismembered portion of society. Senior ministers have been threatening longer jail-terms of all things, in blackly comic, American justice style.

d) the immigrants may soon be joined in the pillage by a host of left-wing organisations. Since the riots of 1968 made the error of not going far enough and thus resulting in minimal long-term change, there is implicit consensus that for this action to be justified it must be pursued to its natural extreme: all-out civil disobedience, until the government falls. While official opinion seems to be that this political activity will quickly run its course, there is evidence that it is steadily mounting and indeed heading from outside the city into the centre. I have noticed in my very central quartier here that there has been a steady and ominous thickening on street corners and among shadows of determined looking folk from the banlieues (it reminds me a little of Hitchcock’s The Birds).

These two views convey the spectrum of analysis on what’s happening. But there’s a broader context as well …

POLITICAL PARALYSIS: This editorial from the London Telegraph also highlights the backgrounf of political ennui in Europe as a whole:

France is marked by fin de régime rivalry between Mr Sarkozy and Dominique de Villepin, the prime minister. Germany faces the sclerosis of a grand coalition. In Italy, Silvio Berlusconi is more discredited than ever. In Britain, while Tony Blair defiantly bangs the security drum, the electorate waits for him to step down. And all this is taking place against a chronic inability to boost sluggish growth. 1968 or 1848 it may not be, but there is in western Europe a general feeling of malaise, of disillusionment with politicians, expressed by low voting figures. On this, the riots rocking France could feed.

What we are witnessing may be the beginning of the collapse of the old regime in Europe.

MULTI-DETERMINED? A reader upbraids me on my fashion judgments:

Well, the people who did the bombing on the London underground weren’t wearing Osama-wear, either. They were wearing exactly what they always wore, and liked wearing: izod shirts, blue jeans, running shoes. That didn’t protect the 53 people who they blew up.
The “Islamic” point here is that being stopped to show papers to (non-Muslim) police, even for reasonable reasons, is a “humiliation” for an Islamic male. They call interference from the police “the occupation”. Meanwhile, the call from the “mature Muslim leadership” in France is explicitly for an Ottoman-style “millet” system of “separate development”: i.e., you French give us tons of money and we’ll rule ourselves in these apartment blocs around Paris with Sharia. Even as it is, for a decade or more these places have been mostly “no go” areas for the police, which is part of the problem.
This is the intifada brought home from the West Bank to Western Europe. In Aarhus, Denmark, the rioting is because of a cartoon in a newspaper making fun of Mohammed. It doesn’t matter what the specific issue is that is touching it off: the issues are different everywhere. But it is definitely a Muslim/non-Muslim clash.

Of course, it could be what my shrink helpfully calls “multi-determined.” It could be Islamism and underclass violence and the French economic model. The situation is also dynamic. Ideologues are very good at exploiting violence and disorder for their own ends. In this respect, this video, showing masked men burning cars and screaming “Allahu Akbar” is not exactly encouraging.

“If Brokeback Mountain starred two macho, hunky, out, gay actors, it would be much less of a cultural moment, with much less chance of drawing a general audience. It’s the straightness of the male leads playing gay that generates the energy and the buzz. Will they kiss? You betcha. Will they go further? Probably not, that would be too gay. From at least as far back as Tom Hanks in Philadelphia, the straight-playing-gay setup functions as the evidence of exceptional commitment, exceptional acting ability: if they’re willing to play gay, in spite of how repellent they must, as real straight men, find it, well obviously they’re artists of the highest, purist level. So on the one hand I’m grateful to these two actors for making what, from all I hear, is likely to be a terrific movie that I will love for the way it portrays gay people with individuality and authenticity. And on the other hand, I resent these two actors for leveraging gay people’s outsider status to show how talented and hip they are.”

We may not yet fully understand how weird this administration has been. And how powerful the “Number 2” really is – and how utterly unaccountable to anyone but his putative boss.

I’m concerned about Muslim extremism in Europe and fear the worst. But I have to say that the reporting so far from France does not conform very closely to fears of an explicitly Islamist insurrection. I found this post by Iain Murray very helpful. And this quote struck me as telling:

They complained that police manhandle them during identity card checks, even claiming that some officers plant hashish on them as a pretext for arrests, and that they regularly fire off rubber pellets during sweeps. “You wear these clothes, with this color skin and you’re automatically a target for police,” said Ahmed, 18, pointing to his mates in Izod polo shirts, Nike sneakers and San Antonio Spurs T-shirts.

San Antonio Spurs? Not exactly Osama-wear.

A year and a half after legal civil marriage in one state, the Daily Show investigates the evidence for social and moral disintegration.

Ramesh refines his position. Money quote:

Most of my commentary in this matter has concerned judges who hold views about judging that constrain their discretion. If the judge practices a Dworkinian ‘moral reading’ of the Constitution, then he is, whether or not he admits it, playing a legislative role. A Catholic Dworkinian who reads a right to abortion into the Constitution would have sinned in the same way as (and perhaps in more ways than) a legislator who votes for abortion.

So a Catholic Justice who believes in the right to privacy as a moral as well as a constitutional matter could be denied communion, if such a right were construed to include the right to abort an unborn child. Or am I missing something? That strikes me as a big deal. And the bishops’ threat to withhold communion not just from elected officials but “public” ones seems to me to include judges. The upshot of Benedict’s church will be indeed to dictate to Catholic public officials, including judges, what they can and cannot do and still be allowed to receive communion. Under those circumstances, a judge’s religion would indeed be fair game for Senate hearings, it seems to me. Sad to say.

This graphic helps illustrate the extent of the immigrant Muslim uprising in France.

It’s on this continent. Sebastian Mallaby also has an excellent summary of why the U.S. is so far behind other countries in Tamiflu acquisition. Part of the answer, of course, is that we have a profoundly incompetent administration.