Email of the Day II

A reader writes:

I read your post fawning over McCain. Haven’t you gone down this road before? I seem to remember in 2000, you fawned over a republican candidate for president who was going to heal the nation. You’re like the abused wife who keeps going back to her husband only to be abused again. Let’s face it, McCain is going to have to make peace with the evangelicals to get the Republican nomination. He is going to have to promise to support their reactionary agenda, which includes opposing gay rights and appointing conservative judges to the bench. So after two years of a McCain presidency, you will only be dismayed again.

Another chimes in:

Do you ever change? You could have written this boot-licking tribute to Dubya.  As a matter of fact, you probably did.

Fitzgerald, Libby … Cheney?

Cheneyshawnthewafpgetty Isikoff’s latest report shows how close Patrick Fitzgerald is getting to the heart of the Plame outing. He seems to have nailed down Cheney’s hand-written notes on Wilson’s op-ed in the NYT – "Do we ordinarily send people out pro bono to work for us? Or did his wife send him on a junket?" – as well as hard evidence that Libby knew full well that Plame’s identity was classified before he leaked it. Who knows what he’s got on Rove? The court notice on Cheney’s hand-written notes as evidence can be read here.

I have a feeling that Fitzgerald isn’t even close to finishing his work. And if I were Karl Rove, I’d be having a rough weekend.

(Photo: Shawn Thew/AFP/Getty.)

Chutzpah Goldberg

A reader points out the following irony. Jonah Goldberg, harrumphing about yours truly at NRO, writes the following:

The Party of Andrew released a sharply partisan attack today, insuating [sic] that John Derbyshire is a Nazi.

Actually, I think Derbyshire is much more like a nineteenth century Prussian. But I guess when Jonah sees the word "Herr", he immediately thinks of Nazis. In fact, he has such insinuations on the brain. His next book happens to be called "Liberal Fascism: The Totalitarian Temptation from Mussolini to Hillary Clinton." No word yet on whether Jonah, like Ramesh, will get Ann Coulter to blurb the cover, the design of which can be seen below.

Liberalfascism

Email of the Day

A reader writes:

It is comforting to find that I can count on certain things remaining consistent, and thereby confirming my convictions. I picked up a complimentary copy of Time recently. I haven’t read it for a long time. There is typically nothing new, or at least nothing intellectually honest in it. You confirmed that for me again. Your article, "My Problem with Christianism" was predictable. A shame. A believer who lives without reference to absolute truth provided by a Sovereign God in His revealed Word is pitiably controlled by a culture-generated moral relativism, and personal deception. He has forgotten, or never understood that the Christian faith is not about the believer, but about the Creator and Redeemer. I might excuse your pedantic understanding of the faith you claim, if you were not so obviously promoting a left wing political agenda – welcome to the very "political polution" you "abhor." The "Christianity" you promote tastes like tepid bath water (Rev. 3:14-16.) What a disingenuous essay! Got anything better?

McCain, The Healer

Mccainbenbakerredux

The speech is, to give my first impression, a truly inspired piece of work. It’s funny at times, sharp, moving, sincere, self-deprecating. What it manages to do is something that, sadly, Bush has been unable to do. It manages to argue forcefully for the moral cause of the war against Islamist terrorism and yet to defend the dignity and value of our strong and impassioned debates about it. It’s about reconciliation – and not just within Republican circles. It’s about reconciliation at a national level, a way to get beyond the polarization of the last few years, without descending into hazy delusions about the core and real disagreements that still divide us:

Americans deserve more than tolerance from one another, we deserve each other‚Äôs respect, whether we think each other right or wrong in our views, as long as our character and our sincerity merit respect, and as long as we share, for all our differences, for all the noisy debates that enliven our politics, a mutual devotion to the sublime idea that this nation was conceived in ‚Äì that freedom is the inalienable right of mankind, and in accord with the laws of nature and nature’s Creator.
We have so much more that unites us than divides us. We need only to look to the enemy who now confronts us, and the benighted ideals to which Islamic extremists pledge allegiance – their disdain for the rights of Man, their contempt for innocent human life – to appreciate how much unites us.

The tone is one in which McCain uses his advanced age – which will surely be a factor in the coming election – as an advantage. He provides a narrative of his life that portrays him as a former hot-head who has learned his lessons. He’s trying to defuse two potential liabilities with a single story. It’s artfully done:

Let us exercise our responsibilities as free people. But let us remember, we are not enemies. We are compatriots defending ourselves from a real enemy. We have nothing to fear from each other. We are arguing over the means to better secure our freedom, promote the general welfare and defend our ideals. It should remain an argument among friends; each of us struggling to hear our conscience, and heed its demands; each of us, despite our differences, united in our great cause, and respectful of the goodness in each other. I have not always heeded this injunction myself, and I regret it very much.

McCain is telling us – showing us – that he is ready to bind up the wounds and lead America. That’s what this speech suggests – and it may well become the theme of his presidential run. And, although I am less of a believer in government than McCain is, it may be what this country desperately needs, in a very perilous time. I know I’m a sap for McCain. Always have been. But he may soon be America’s indispensable leader. And a critical part of that leadership will be undoing the divisions that have been allowed to deepen and calcify in the last five years. If he runs against Hillary, it will be as a healer against a figure who, fairly or unfairly, represents salt in America’s ideological wounds. It’s a winning message; and a necessary one.

(Photo: Ben Baker/Redux.)