Blasphemy and Ratings

Pg011754943dt A Catholic group’s attempt to boycott a South Park episode that offended many was spectacularly successful in New Zealand. The viewership of the show increased by more than six times the usual rating. Money quote:

"The protest centred on a statue of the Virgin Mary, with participants — clutching Bibles and religious icons — singing hymns, reciting the rosary and offering other prayers.

A Catholic priest who led the protesters in prayer asked God to enlighten those responsible for the cartoon "and strengthen them to see how much harm they can do."

Last weekend, New Zealand’s Roman Catholic bishops issued a letter urging parishioners to boycott the channel and its sponsors. The Federation of Islamic Associations of New Zealand also protested the episode and said it was deeply offensive."

I hope Bill Donahue takes notice. But he won’t.

(You can buy the t-shirt here.)

Back from Cato

Well, that was an invigorating lunch discussion. The fiscal case against this administration is so damning and unanswerable that I’m not surprised the White House refused to offer up a single person to argue their case. Cato asked for someone. Rove sent no one. The audience was primarily conservative and libertarian, so the fact that almost no one there could defend Bush either – except as better than the alternatives – was instructive. But I think the "better-than-the-alternatives" point is awry as well. The salient question is: could a president Al Gore have managed to increase public spending as massively and as permanently as this crew? He would surely have been stopped in his tracks by a Republican Congress. Even a Democratic Congress would have felt the need to assuage the Republican grass roots and scaled back the huge growth. But not Bush. By hitching the Republican base to Christianism, and by legitimizing massive spending for a Republican, he has been able to dispense with much of what conservatism once meant. Limited government? Yeah, right. Balanced budgets? A joke. Individual liberty? Only if you’re in the Middle East. Huge tax increases? Just you wait. They’re now inevitable. A welfare state bigger and more intrusive than Ted Kennedy could dream of? That will be Bush’s legacy. It will take conservatism a generation to recover its bearings.

By the way, you can buy Bruce Bartlett’s book, "Impostor," here. And you can read about a glimmer of hope here.

Race and Genetics

A sane reader writes:

"I am all for rigorous scientific research on this subject.  Of course there is a lot of genetic diversity and different genetic adaptations (including cognitive) between populations.  But without becoming as reactionary as the Harvard Humanities department, I am very skeptical about subsets and broad generalizations based solely on race–because those groups are often too broad and arbitrary.  I don’t discount the Bell Curve’s statistical analysis, but I also don’t think it is a definitive answer of what is going on in human populations in regard to race–any more or less than I think Jared Diamond’s politically correct theory of geographical determinism is a definitive answer.  Instead I suspect there is a very complex relationship between a variety of factors (genetic, geographical, cultural ideas, even dumb luck) that control the rise and fall of civilizations and success of certain populations.  When looking at nature vs. nurture, culture is often the driving force of natural selection–and genetic changes can appear to happen almost spontaneously when such forces come to bear (which explains the rapid shift of skeletal structure in Europe and Asia after agriculture became widespread)."

That’s the trouble with reality: it’s all so fiendishly complicated. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t investigate every angle of the subject, free from political correctness and excessive social pressure.

Correction of the Day

"A March 5 article about problems with MetroAccess service did not make it clear that Scott McDaniel, a MetroAccess rider, is an employee of Service Sources Inc., which operates the Woodmont Center in Arlington County. The article also misstated the nature of his disabilities. McDaniel is legally blind, and although he has other disabilities, he and his parents say he is not mentally disabled," – The Washington Post, yesterday. (Hat tip: Wonkette.)