From the 1930s. Among the possible failings of a wife:
Puts her cold feet on husband at night to warm them.
Fails to sew on buttons or darn socks regularly.
And no scale for husbands. (Hat tip: Mind Hacks.)
From the 1930s. Among the possible failings of a wife:
Puts her cold feet on husband at night to warm them.
Fails to sew on buttons or darn socks regularly.
And no scale for husbands. (Hat tip: Mind Hacks.)
Alter on Kaus. I’m not sure Mickey’s views are driven purely by contrarianism. Although my saying so may prompt him to deny it.
The Burmese generals aren’t the only ones. This Is Zimbabwe documents the destruction of food in Zimbabwe, a political tactic the government has used before.
Well, an embryo, apparently. And killed after five days.
A worthy successor to LOL Cats. My favorite:
"…as my husband pointed out this morning, if the inability to concede error or defeat even in light of irrefutable, empirical evidence and in the face of spiraling support and tanking morale is feminism, George Bush must be the feminist icon of the ages," – Dahlia Lithwick.
Instapundit has been incorporated into Pajamas Media. James Joyner doesn’t understand what is in it for Reynolds:
I don’t see what Glenn gets out of it. He’s easily the most well known and highly trafficked solo blogger out there. One would think he already enjoys whatever synergies come with being a PJM founder and board member. His feed is now prominently placed on the PJM page but one would think there’s pretty high overlap between InstaPundit readers/subscribers and those who visit the PJM portal.
I imagine it’s easier to sell ads in a bundle. And Glenn probably doesn’t have to do too much administrative work on his end. Win-win, if they’ve made a deal to split the revenue equitably.
A reader writes:
In your post "Email In West Virginia", you close with "When people simply refuse to deal with fact, something else is going on." I’ve been thinking about what’s going on for a while. This FT piece set me off . At the end of the article, they quote a young West Virginia man who "insisted he was not racist", but said "I want someone who is a full-blooded American as president".
At first, I thought this was standard anti-immigrant stuff. Then I had an epiphany.
Remember "Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner"? A rich, highly educated, well-spoken, widely respected, black doctor freaks out his girlfriend’s progressive, liberal, elitist, white parents? Yes, that was 1967, but how far have we really come since then?
My own grandmother was a liberal atheist. She campaigned for the Equal Rights Amendment. She came from a progressive, politically active, elite liberal farming family in Iowa. She believed in civil rights for all. She treated Native Americans with respect at a time when they were still considered dirty Injuns. And she had no problem getting along with blacks in Seattle before she died.
What my grandmother absolutely would not tolerate, however, was miscegenation.
Blacks, Asians, Jews – all of these were perfectly respectable associates. But marrying one, for a "white person", was completely unacceptable. The ultimate taboo, really. For older people, and people who live in areas that have long been predominantly white, the miscegenation issue is the last bastion of knee-jerk racial identity. And whites are not alone in this. Every well-defined racial and cultural group has this taboo actively at play, even today, regardless of political bent.
When an older female Clinton supporter refuses to believe Obama is not muslim, or a young West Virginian hankers for someone a bit more "full-blooded" than Obama, they are using code-words for the ultimate threatening "other", the other that sneaks into your home and screws your daughter and destroys your bloodline.
The very qualities that allow Obama to cross racial and cultural divides with his message of unity, that make him a "non-threatening black man", also make him anathema.
538 recalls a fascinating fact:
30 percent of West Virginian Democrats voted for George W. Bush in 2004, which I’m pretty sure is the highest figure in the country. If Clinton has turned out those lapsed Democrats — and she’s the sort of candidate who can — the turnout may beat our expectations.
A big blow to the GOP – and an omen for the fall. Bush got 62 percent in that district in 2004. The turnout was 100,000. Huge.