Obama-Bayh?

A reader proposes:

Maybe your logic about a unity ticket is right, but you are thinking of the wrong person:  If Obama wants a unity ticket without any of the baggage, he picks Bayh. Her national co-chair.  Senator from the Midwest with foreign policy credentials and executive experience.  From a red state.  New generation, just like Obama. Well-respected, good-looking, twin sons, no skeletons.  White voters like him. Downsides:  Dems might lose the Senate seat, and Bayh would have trouble with the “attack dog” role.  But if a unity ticket is what Dems want, without the Clinton baggage, he’s the most obvious choice.  The chattering class will know what it means.

Dissent Of A Democrat

A reader writes:

As a liberal regular reader who has grown to know and love you (in the online sense of the word), your Obama/Clinton article makes me wonder if you have lost your marbles. It is no wonder that you are fixated on death lately.

There are two obvious choices for Obama’s VP slot- Richardson and Edwards. Richardson boosts the West, and Edwards could swing Virginia and possibly North Carolina. Clinton on the ticket changes nothing, and kills the Democrats down-ticket. Perhaps that is what you are hoping for, in your moderate sub-conscious, that while you want Obama, you fear Obama with a Dem super-majority.

I am a registered Dem, so I will vote for whoever is the nominee, but an Obama/Clinton ticket is damn close to an oxymoron. You must know that, right?

I can’t say I want an Obama-Clinton ticket; I don’t. But I felt it worth airing how it could work, if Obama is left no other option.