Category: The Dish

The Real Elitists

A reader writes:

My background: I’m an educated centrist, and as it were, gun-owner and sometime duck hunter.

On the ‘elitist’ debate: I’ve been amused to see the likes of Bill Kristol, Roger Kimball and Rich Lowry and other conservative commentators so incredibly desperate in their efforts to convince people like me that we’re being looked down upon by Obama — a black guy raised by a single mom who worked as an organizer among the poor of Chicago, etc. etc.

I personally don’t feel in the least that Obama is an elitist. Rather, I feel the elitists are those highly educated, inside-the-beltway weenies like Kristol, the bow-tie wearing Kimball, the UVA grad and prepster Lowry who are tripping over themselves to tell me how offended I ought to feel when I know damn well I’m not offended. Id be shocked if Roger Kimball, Lowry or God knows Bill Kristol know the first thing about hunting ducks, or if they could survive ten minutes in a cold duck blind before dawn, the artery-clogging breakfast that follows or the round of beer and whiskey drinking that goes on the night before.

In my opinion, listening to these folks go on and on about how offended I should be makes me feel a hell of a lot more condescended to than hearing some single throw-away line at a fundraiser. Obama said his thing once; these wankers won’t shut up. It’s as if they think I’m too stupid to figure things out for myself, so they can’t miss an opportunity to tell me how I’ve been slighted. Well sorry, weenies — I just don’t feel slighted, and that’s because I’ll be damned if I’m going to pick a president based on a stupid gaffe when there is a war going on and when the economy is going in the shitter. These guys must really think I’m a moron.

The Absolution Election?

A reader writes:

Even at this late date I have yet to see anyone accurately describe what this election is about. Iraq?  No. The economy?  No. Healthcare?  No. Embarrassment, shame and guilt?  Yes, yes and yes.

Only a few months after the 2004 election — the first post-9/11 election, and the first election since the start of the Iraq War — most Americans knew the truth: the Bush administration had retained power by mercilessly bullying its own citizens and playing the fear card to the nth degree.  Maybe you didn’t fall for it, maybe I didn’t, but enough people.

Nothing like this has happened in anyone’s lifetime, Andrew. Nothing. Nixon’s resignation wasn’t even close. This was wholesale abuse, and of the Constituon no less.  Yet because the nation voted for these men, it was also self-abuse.

That’s why voters want change: they desperately want to forget.

It’s not about payback for Bush — it’s too late for that.  This is about choosing someone who will get the blood off our hands.  Someone who will make American strong and tall and right again. The press also missed the point that Obama’s ‘trouble’ with Wright, and his subsequent speech ostensibly on race, left him as the only clearly identifiable and credible person of faith in the race, in either party.  In effect, the Wright ‘scandal’ allowed Obama to claim ground that neither McCain nor Clinton will ever be able to take away from him.  He is the priest in this election, and we need absolution.  He understands faith, and how badly ours has been tested.  Forgiveness. Sin.  That’s what this election is about.

This is a deep wound, and it’s going to take time to heal.  Which is why voters are looking for a healer.  And in political terms that means, first and foremost, a statesman.

I see only one.

McCain is as good as the other side will get on this. But I feel very much this way, and it has definitely weighed large in alleviating my misgivings about Obama’s economically liberal policy agenda.