The Guilty Men

Last week fleshed out some more detail on the Bush administration’s torture regime. The third Yoo memo was so egregious even Yoo is finding excuses. The pattern of evidence is now strongly suggesting that the legal "fixing" that made illegal torture suddenly legal followed already-made executive decisions to deploy torture and non-Geneva interrogation as the lead tactic in the war on Islamist terrorism. We also discover more evidence of how high up the interest in these interrogations went:

On September 25, as the process of elaborating new interrogation techniques reached a critical point, a delegation of the administration’s most senior lawyers arrived at Guantánamo. The group included the president’s lawyer, Alberto Gonzales, who had by then received the Yoo-Bybee Memo; Vice President Cheney’s lawyer, David Addington, who had contributed to the writing of that memo; the C.I.A.’s John Rizzo, who had asked for a Justice Department sign-off on individual techniques, including waterboarding, and received the second (and still secret) Yoo-Bybee Memo; and Jim Haynes, Rumsfeld’s counsel. They were all well aware of al-Qahtani. “They wanted to know what we were doing to get to this guy,” Dunlavey told me, “and Addington was interested in how we were managing it.” I asked what they had to say. “They brought ideas with them which had been given from sources in D.C.,” Dunlavey said. “They came down to observe and talk.” Throughout this whole period, Dunlavey went on, Rumsfeld was “directly and regularly involved.”

Beaver confirmed the account of the visit. Addington talked a great deal, and it was obvious to her that he was a “very powerful man” and “definitely the guy in charge,” with a booming voice and confident style. Gonzales was quiet. Haynes, a friend and protégé of Addington’s, seemed especially interested in the military commissions, which were to decide the fate of individual detainees. They met with the intelligence people and talked about new interrogation methods. They also witnessed some interrogations. Beaver spent time with the group.

Talking about the episode even long afterward made her visibly anxious. Her hand tapped and she moved restlessly in her chair. She recalled the message they had received from the visitors: Do “whatever needed to be done.” That was a green light from the very top—the lawyers for Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and the C.I.A. The administration’s version of events—that it became involved in the Guantánamo interrogations only in November, after receiving a list of techniques out of the blue from the “aggressive major general”—was demonstrably false.

When Rumsfeld professed "shock" at the techniques revealed at Abu Ghraib, he was expressing "shock" at interrogation techniques he had already personally examined and approved for use at Gitmo. He was expressing shock after having personally directed one of the architects of the torture regime at Gitmo, Geoffrey Miller, to go to Abu Ghraib to ‘Gitmoize" it. He was lying. 

Did Someone Actually Write This Sentence?

From the Weekly Standard last week:

I haven’t really been following this issue, mostly because I’m pretty sure that whatever the government is doing to these terrorists wouldn’t "shock my conscience."

Is this what conservatism now is: proud ignorance of the gravest moral matters combined with blind faith that the government can’t possibly err?

Beyond Fear

"We have to see that behind much of the furor is fear and these fears are comprehensible. There is a fear among straight priests of becoming a member of a small minority in what is perceived as a "gay’ vocation." There is a fear among some homosexual priests of being found out, a feeling of guilt and so on. We have to reassure people so that the issue can be faced calmly. If there is a fevered anxiety about all this, then it does not help people mature and face their own complexity. It is not the case that there are just these two groups, homosexuals and heterosexuals. People are complex, and have contrary motions in their hearts. Straight people may be tempted to strangle the little bit of them that responds to people of the same sex and fear gay people. But that is a disguised form of fearing themselves. And gay seminarians may be tempted to deny who they are, adopt an anti-gay rhetoric, and all that is highly unhealthy and deforming.

It is important also that someone’s sexual orientation is not the most important thing about them, as if everyone was a sexual maniac, endlessly wanting to get other people into bed. The most important thing about anyone, regardless of whether they are gay or straight, is that they be able to love, and that they are helped to love well, deeply, honestly, transparently," – Timothy Radcliffe, OP, former master general of the Dominicans.

Obama = Bush?

Clinton strikes again. She compares Bush’s 2000 speeches and lack of specifics to Obama’s speeches and alleged lack of specifics this time around. But Obama’s website is packed with specifics – some of which I don’t find congenial. But at least I’m not pretending they don’t exist. Meanwhile, another Clinton gaffe/fib/lie/misspeak/mishear. Memo to Senator Clinton: get more than three hours’ sleep a night.

The Tax Returns!

There was something depressingly familiar about the late Friday news release, but credit where it’s due: the Clintons have disclosed their multi-million dollar fortune since leaving the White House. It’s good to know that the net worth of the allegedly "beer-track" candidate is infinitely higher than her opponent; and it’s also good to know that Bill Clinton’s enmeshment with tabloid mogul Ron Burkle extends into the tens of millions. Few raise the question of whether the Clintons’ cooptation of the National Enquirer empire has any degree of self-interest in it, but perhaps these things are best left to Mickey.