Comments Update

A reader writes:

No. You don’t need them. See your own honest and chastened posts on bandwidth-saturation and obsessive-compulsive tendencies in blogging and blog consumption.

Comment threads can be revelatory (cf. the essential avalanche of scathing and incredulous responses to Sean Wilentz’s bizarre reverse-racism essay at The New Republic’s website). But more often they are blathering and toxic sumps. I like the lean, mean linear simplicity and lone-d.j. voice of The Daily Dish. Don’t open up rabbit holes along the excellent trail of breadcrumbs you’re already giving us.

"Lone DJ." That metaphor has occurred to me recently, as blogging continues to evolve as a medium and as a profession. It is a little like DJing: you wrote your own tunes, but you’re always sampling others, and mixing it all up with the techno potentialities of the new media. Yep: DJing is a pretty good way to look at it. Oh, and don’t forget to vote. Latest results available here.

Where Are We?

A few thoughts: that red phone ad is working. It’s not that Clinton would make better decisions on national security. She has scant experience in foreign policy, and is guided primarily by what will be least vulnerable to Republican demagoguery (it’s the only common thread over the years when you look closely). It’s also going her way because she’s familiar to people – and blue-collar voters in Ohio associate familiarity with security. (One reason they narrowly backed an untested governor from Texas was his last name.) The anti-Muslim smears may also have worked, and Clinton delicately managed to keep them alive last night. And the press has gotten cold feet – caving to the Clintons’ preposterous idea that somehow the field is tilted against them. Howie Kurtz gets to regurgitate Hannity’s smears as if they were legitimate matters for press inquiry, while the press essentially gives the Clintons a pass on their continued refusal to do the most basic act of transparency: providing their tax returns. Clinton has also dominated every news cycle in the past week. And there’s some anecdotal evidence that Republicans are planning to vote for Clinton to kill off the Obama candidacy before it destroys them in the fall.

On the other hand, it’s important to remember that the delegate math is still heavily stacked against Clinton.

She has to win all four states tomorrow by very healthy margins just to stay viable. Her husband and co-candidate for president, Bill Clinton, has openly said that she has to win both Ohio and Texas for the two of them to stay in the race. What matters tomorrow night will be delegates. If Obama maintains or increases his delegate lead, she should withdraw. But, of course, she will never withdraw of her own volition. And that’s part of her strategy. She will gladly hold her party hostage to her own narcissism. She did it with her husband for much of their last second term.

I get the feeling that if she ekes out a win or two, she will insist on pursuing the full Monty: a scorched earth effort to seat Michigan and Florida delegates; suing Texas if the delegates don’t go her way; a full court press on any super-delegates who balk; and a gut-wrenching struggle for power up to the convention.

If she cannot be stopped, she can still be slowed. If you’re in Ohio, Rhose Island, Vermont and Texas, you know what to do. This is what you call the fierce urgency of now.

Israel On The Brink

James Bennet:

George W. Bush’s latest half-hearted peace initiative; attempts at accommodation by the moderate Palestinian leadership; the calls by Israel’s realists for uprooting West Bank settlements; and those touching concerts, conferences, and student exchanges devoted to Middle East peace: all remain hostage to Hamas’s ability to start a war at a time and place of its choosing.

GOP Sabotage?

A reader writes:

So I’m at lunch today with coworkers, here in Columbus, Ohio, and the primaries of course are the hot topic of discussion. The group, mostly conservative, Republican leaning White Anglo-Saxon Protestants, agrees across the board they will be voting for a Democrat tomorrow because McCain is a lock in our collective opinion for the GOP nomination. 

Now what shocked me was how many of the group (a majority in fact) are voting for Hillary because they like McCain’s chances this fall against her better than against Obama. In fact as I prod more, they to a man admit they’d rather see Obama in the White House than Clinton, but ultimately their allegiance is to McCain, hence the vote for Clinton.

The McCainiacs are trying to select his weakest opponent. Makes perfect sense from their point of view.

Comments

The voting has stayed almost rock solid since the beginning at 60 – 40 against adding comments to the Dish. I didn’t realize but the poll is actually restricted to one vote per IP address. Patrick figured it would prevent robots and people just pressing the button indefinitely. But the poll has only been up a few hours, so if you haven’t voted and feel strongly about this, have your say.