Libertarians and the War

Justin Logan vents on behalf of his colleagues at CATO:

Now, we’re not posting articles every day about the Iraq war, it’s true. To be totally candid, I have very little left to say. It was a disastrous idea to get in, we should have gotten out immediately, we should still get out immediately. Full stop. We have precious little control over either the security environment over the long term or the political environment at all, so pouring money, men, or materiel in is throwing good stuff after bad. I imagine, although I’m not a soothsayer, that things will get noticeably worse for a time after we withdraw — but that this will happen whether we get out this year, next year, or in 10 years.

But in a nutshell, that’s about all I have to say. And I’ve been saying it to anybody who asks. Unfortunately, the New York Times hasn’t asked, and the Washington Post certainly hasn’t asked.

Music: Supply and Demand

Why does anyone buy music albums any more? One suggestion:

Music is in a post capitalist environment, and totally uncharted territory for any commodity. There is no scarcity of music, and the supply outstrips the demand by miles. When people buy an album, they are saying "I like this music or artist enough to support them. I want them to continue to make great music, and I am moved and touched by what they create."

Will magazines be following suit soon?

A Poem For Sunday

About as good a pomo parody as I can imagine by LOLcat:

    april hates u, makes lilacs, u no can has.
    april in ur memoriez, making ur desire.
    spring rain in ur dull rootzes.
    
    earth in ur winter, covered in snow
    can has potato. PO-TA-TO.
    INVISIBLE SUMMER! RAININGZES!
    im in ur hofgarden, drinking ur coffeez.
    
    at archduke’s haus, invisible sled!
    im in ur moutainz, holding on tight.
    no can has cheezburger.
    oral sex metaphors in ur poem.

The original (for direct comparison) is here. (Hat tip: Boston Globe’s Brainiac.)

 

Cole, Crittenden, Blog Wars

John Cole gets the usual treatment from the partisan right for thinking out loud. All’s fair in love and blogging but publishing someone’s work details so they can be harassed by every troll out there seems to me to be beyond the pale. There’s also a bizarre notion that opposing torture or criticizing the Iraq war is somehow "tacking leftward." Opposing the current Bush-Cheney ideology can definitely come from what we once called the left, but it can also spring from conservative sources. I grew up taking Soviet torture seriously when some on the left looked the other way. The notion that opposing "torture" is therefore now a leftist position just befuddles me. Ditto: massive spending and borrowing, undermining the rule of law, and unleashing anarchy in occupied countries. These are now bedrock principles of the right?

Quote For The Day

Rembrandt_harmensz_van_rijn_125

"Often I have asked friends to give me their first impression of Rembrandt’s Prodigal Son. Inevitably, they point to the wise old man who forgives his son: the benevolent patriarch.

The longer I look at ‘the patriarch’, the clearer it becomes to me that Rembrandt has done something quite different from letting God pose as the wise old head of a family. It all began with the hands. The two are quite different. The father’s left hand touching the son’s shoulder is strong and muscular. The fingers are spread out and cover a large part of the prodigal son’s shoulder and back. I can see a certain pressure, especially in the thumb. That hand seems not only to touch, but, with its strength, also to hold. Even though there is a gentleness in the way the father’s left hand touches his son, it is not without a firm grip.

How different is the father’s right hand! This hand does not hold or grasp. It is refined, soft, and very tender. The fingers are close to each other and they have an elegant quality. It lies gently upon the son’s shoulder. It wants to caress, to stroke, and to offer consolation and comfort. It is a mother’s hand….

As soon as I recognized the difference between the two hands of the father, a new world of meaning opened up for me. The Father is not simply a great patriarch. He is mother as well as father. He touches the son with a masculine hand and a feminine hand. He holds, and she caresses. He confirms and she consoles. He is , indeed, God, in whom both manhood and womanhood, fatherhood and motherhood, are fully present. That gentle and caressing right hand echoes for me the words of the prophet Isaiah: "Can a woman forget her baby at the breast, feel no pity for the chile she has borne? Even if these were to forget, I shall not forget you. Look, I have engraved you on the palms of my hands," – Henri Nouwen, "The Return Of The Prodigal Son."