A new blog on the scene. Written daily in the seventeenth century. Quite a talent.
BLAIR’S WELL-FOUNDED SOBRIETY: The British tabloids have had some fun mocking Tony Blair’s New Year’s Message about the terrible potential of the coming year. But Blair – again – is doing the right thing. Leadership means telling people what they don’t want to hear. It’s not just possible there will be a terrorist attack this coming year that is equal to or greater than the horror of 9/11/01. It’s probable. It’s not just possible that Saddam will unleash the vilest weapons in his arsenal in the coming war. It’s probable. My own view is that this year is probably going to be an awful one: full of death and conflict and struggle and because of them, economic distress. I think the era of weapons of mass destruction in the hands of evil, stateless men is imminent; and that things will likely get a lot worse before they get better. I sure hope I’m wrong, and that in a year’s time I’ll look back on this and wince. But Blair is right to have said what he did. Preparing people for the worst is what leadership sometimes means. And what should we do about it? I’ll defer to a piece in today’s Daily Telegraph on the vision of J.R.R. Tolkien:
The moral is the motto of the British redcoat: “Look to your front.” Don’t think about what other people are doing: you’ll get it wrong and it’s disheartening. Or, to quote Gandalf again – and Jackson picked out just these words to repeat in the first movie, varying the pronouns cunningly – “That [the future] is not for us to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.”
MUGABE’S NEW LOW: The only newspaper independent of the Zimbabwean regime hasn’t been printed in ten days.
BLAMING THE JEWS: Fascinating detail from the British government’s release of 30-year-old classified documents in the Telegraph yesterday. The British Foreign Office – like the State Department, a center of elite Arabophilia – blamed Israel for the deaths of its athletes at the Munich Olympics. A despatch from Jerusalem tried to explain why there had been almost no Arab condemnation of the killing of Jews:
Gayford Woodrow, the consul general in Jerusalem, sent a dispatch to the Foreign Office on Sept 12, six days after the attack, saying: “Before we reproach the Arabs too much, perhaps we might try to put ourselves in their shoes. “They are, after all, human beings with normal human failings. The Palestinians in particular have seen their land taken away from them by a group of mainly European invaders equipped with superior armed force and modern technology. Whatever one’s moral criticism, it must be agreed that the Munich operation was well planned and that the Arabs there carried it out to the bitter end. It is said that lives were really lost because of Israel and West German bungling incompetence.”
Ah those plucky terrorists. Not their fault if a few pushy Jews got killed.
“COMPLICATIONS OF PNEUMONIA”: I’m intrigued by the weird locution used by every single newspaper obit to describe the cause of photographer Herb Ritts’ death. The phrase is “complications of pneumonia.” Now I have no way of knowing for sure what killed Herb Ritts at 50, but it seems highly unlikely that it was pneumonia alone. Very, very few people with access to decent healthcare die of pneumonia alone any more. But the phrase is very reminiscent of the euphemisms first used a decade or two ago with regard to AIDS. With AIDS, the precipitant cause of death is often some kind of opportunistic infection, and in the beginning of the plague, pneumonia was a leading infection. Hence people could get around saying they had AIDS by stating some subsequent illness as the cause of death. So the question is: was the openly gay Ritt’s pneumonia a freak and dangerous strain that is newsworthy in its own right (like Jim Henson’s) or was it HIV-related? And do newspapers have some responsibility to tell us which? It seems to me that when an openly gay guy dies at 50 of pneumonia, any decent editor would ask a simple follow-up. Or are they still colluding in the shame that some still attach to an HIV diagnosis?
BEGALA AWARD NOMINEE: “The New York Times continues down the path laid down personally by crazed war-hawk Howell Raines to agitate for a war against Iraq.” – Eric Alterman, finally losing it, at Altercation.
A NEW YEAR’S BABY: This one has two mothers. And some would like to give this child almost no legal protection as the legitimate daughter of two women in a committed legal relationship. Wouldn’t it be better for the kids if their parents had the legal protection of marriage? Social policy from some conservatives: let’s increase illegitimacy and family instability if it helps us stigmatize gays. Or put another way: leave every child with gay parents behind.