The Palin Problem

Hitchens slams Continetti's starburst-laden Palin tome:

Sarah Palin appears to have no testable core conviction except the belief (which none of her defenders denies that she holds, or at least has held and not yet repudiated) that the end of days and the Second Coming will occur in her lifetime.

From earlier in the review:

The Palin problem…might be that she cynically incites a crowd that she has no real intention of pleasing. If she were ever to get herself to the nation's capital, the teabaggers would be just as much on the outside as they are now, and would simply have been the instruments that helped get her elected. In my own not-all-that-humble opinion, duping the hicks is a degree or two worse than condescending to them. It's also much more dangerous, because it meanwhile involves giving a sort of respectability to ideas that were discredited when William Jennings Bryan was last on the stump. The Weekly Standard (itself not exactly a prairie-based publication) might want to think twice before flirting with popular delusions and resentments that are as impossible to satisfy as the demand for a silver standard or a ban on the teaching of Darwin, and are for that very reason hard to tamp down.

What The Networks Owe Us

Palin complained about the various TV interviews exposing her massive ignorance and suggested that they could have been edited to her disadvantage. Would it not be a public service at this point for ABC and CBS to release online the full tapes of the interviews, unedited, so we can have a look and see if Palin's concerns are merited?

What would be lost by this? Let's see the raw, uncut, bigger, longer Palin. And I don't mean Levi.

Neda’s Boyfriend

The Guardian interviews Caspian Makan, boyfriend to Iranian martyr Neda Agha Soltan:

Caspian has lost not only the woman he was planning to marry, but also his country, his family, his friends and his career. Anyone and everyone who had anything to do with Neda's death are now toxic to the Iranian government. Members of her family have been bullied, threatened and even detained. The doctor who is caught on camera trying to save her life is now exiled in Britain. The music teacher who was with her when she died has been rolled out on Iranian television, patently required to deny what he saw: that Neda was shot by a member of the religious militia.

And Caspian disappeared.

In the days after her killing, he spoke out on foreign satellite stations and then vanished. Finally it was confirmed he was in the notorious Evin Prison in Tehran – the frightening symbol of the Shah's oppressive regime smoothly transferred into the hands of the Islamic Republic's secret police. He was held for more than two months, some of that time in solitary confinement. In September he was released on bail pending trial – perhaps being prepared for one of the extraordinary show trials that have been broadcast on Iranian TV over the past months, in which leading supporters of the opposition have been obliged to recant their actions. Urged on by family and friends, Caspian decided he had to escape.

An Intelligence Bonanza Of Another Sort

Marcy Wheeler knocks John Yoo's op-ed:

John Yoo pretends he knows the universe of information on KSM. His argument suggests that the only evidence came from illegal or highly sensitive means.

What the trial will likely show, instead, is that there was a great deal of information already available before they started torturing KSM.

It’ll show that the KSM expert in FBI–who we know was never allowed to get close to the Yoo-sanctioned torture sessions–knew much if not all of the stuff that KSM was blabbing away after being waterboarded the 183rd time.

That’s the real risk for Yoo: not the illegal actions that the trial will expose. But how much evidence there was independent of Yoo’s little torture shop.

One begins to wonder if this trial will not in the end be a smoking gun in proving the war crimes of Bush and Cheney in a court of law. It would be classic Obama to play the game this long and this well.

Live-Blogging Oprah

4.57 pm. Now it's a love-fest between two celebrities with talk-shows.

4.53 pm. "You don't need a title to make a difference." Here again she uses the term "title" as opposed to "office." She really does see politics as an extension of being a Beauty Queen, subject to nice p.r. events, interviews that are restricted to the "light-hearted, working mother" puffery that Oprah is enabling, and cover images on magazines. The idea that a politician holding public office is required to address tough questions about policy and record and the truth of various factual statements does not seem to have occurred to her. I find this disturbing in a politician. It means a contempt for the Fourth Estate and for full public accountability.

4.52 pm. She's clearly hoping to run for president in 2012.

4.50 pm. Still no credible reason why she suddenly quit as governor. Until … she's worried about opposition research. Hmmm. And can we verify if Obama sent any researchers? I haven't heard of it. Another possible lie to be checked out.

4.48 pm. A question: how many vice-presidential or presidential male candidates had a just-born infant child when running? Secondly: how would Todd be able to help if he is physically absent for months at a time?

4.47 pm. We need to fact-check this notion that losing vice-presidential candidates get to speak on election night.

4.44 pm. Palin says that she and Todd are physically apart for months at a time.

4.40 pm. Small fact-check. Palin's statement that she anticipated only one interview with Couric is belied by this advance announcement on the web that says in advance that there were two scheduled in advance.

4.39 pm. Who is Auntie Katie?

4.37 pm. Having called him "Ricky Hollywood," and an aspiring porn star, she says he is loved. She also says she doesn't like "drama" which is like Oprah saying she doesn't like food or my saying I don't like beards.

4.35 pm. She describes "so many inconsistencies" in Levi's story. There are no inconsistencies in Levi's stories. There are only massive differences between his account of reality and Palin's. The real inconsistencies are within Palin's own confused and constantly changing stories and lies.

4.34 pm. Who is preventing Levi from seeing his son? Another useful factual question Palin will refuse to answer and the MSM will not ask. Palin is also doubling down on the notion that Levi never stayed with Bristol.

4.30 pm. A reader writes:

Why would Sarah Palin assume that the Couric interview was going to be "lighthearted, working mother" stuff, when she was just picked to be the VP candidate and no one knew anything about her?

Because she doesn't believe in accountability. She wants to be a celebrity, not a politician. And if she could get to be a politician using the prerogatives of a celebrity – and a propaganda channel like Fox News – she would be happy. That's what's at stake here – beneath this farce.

4.25 pm. Here's the key: she loves the crowds but she hates the idea that she is accountable for anything. She wants acclamation and believes that journalism should reflect that deference.

4.24 pm. "I love books." Levi says he never saw her crack open a book.

4.23 pm. A good question: did the campaign agree to multiple interviews with Couric before the interview started? Palin says she thought there was only one interview. Can we verify this, Mr Schmidt? Is this yet another bald-faced lie?

4.21 pm. Oprah gives the game away: "This was in the book so I assume it was fair game." Oprah clearly agreed in advance only to ask questions from the book's own narrative.This is not journalism; it's celebrity puffery. Of course, it's Oprah.

4.18 pm. So far, most of Oprah's questions can be summarized as: "Isn't it weird how great you are?" In the last segment, Palin was actually forced to be more critical of her campaign than Oprah is. One wonders: is Oprah this desperate to boost her ratings? Is anyone on TV actually interested in finding out the truth?

4.17 pm. "I'm sorry I apologized."

4.16 pm. Oprah is simply reiterating the arguments of the book as if they were true, even though all this is disputed. There is no journalism being committed here. As I suspected.

4.15 pm. It was such an ordeal picking out clothes to wear. If only she were a man.

4.14 pm. "I don't like to shop."

4.12 pm. She's now accusing Steve Schmidt of "diet manipulation". Steve should take out a cannon and fire back – with the facts at his disposal. This should not go unanswered.

4.06 pm. Oprah forced Palin to admit that Obama defended her. But how can Palin argue that her kids were off-limits when Trig was brought out onto the stage and made the subject of a campaign speech? I guess we know by now that logic and consistency are not Palin's strong points.

4.05 pm. She said that the written statement about the Bristol pregnancy was put out by someone else. But as I recall, the statement went out from the Palins, not the McCain campaign. I'll double-check that. Then she says that she re-wrote it but that the re-write did not appear.

4.04 pm "The one skeleton that was in my closet": a D grade in college. Oprah says: "Really?" I said the same thing simultaneously.

4.02 pm Palin says she said yes immediately on the phone. Before she said she had said yes to McCain himself. She has also said that she asked her children for permission first before she said yes. Just trying to keep all the various stories straight here.

4.01 pm It's all about Oprah. Palin says that at the time she thought it was entirely Winfrey's prerogative. Wasn't upset in the slightest. Barely aware of the issue.

The Odd Lies Of Sarah Palin XXXIII: Saturday Night Live

On Oprah today, we are told that Palin says she desperately wanted to go on Saturday Night Live – "I thought it would be fun." She says that the campaign was terribly apprehensive about it and thought the appearance could be "atrocious." She also sticks by the transparently incredible story that she watched the priceless Tina Fey skits with the volume down.

Moreover, Palin insists that the campaign opposed the appearance but she wanted to do it because it would "neutralize some of the parody" she hadn't, by her own account, ever heard.

Well: what does objective reality tell us about this latest story of Palin's?

We actually have emails from Steve Schmidt and Palin that provide contemporaneous evidence to allow us to judge this self-serving tale:

In one email thread, dated October 14, 2008, Palin says she is "not thrilled" with the idea of going on Saturday Night Live as a way of marginalizing the show's unflattering impersonations of her.

"Not after seeing clips of what they've been playing re: my family," Palin writes to campaign manager Steve Schmidt, as well as top strategists Rick Davis; and Nicolle Wallace.

"I had no idea how gross 'celebrities' on that show and in other celebrity venues could get when it comes to family and other aspects of my life that have nothing to do with seeking the vp slot. These folks are whack – didn't know it was as bad as it is… what's the upside in giving them any celebrity venue a ratings boost? That's Todd's input also," she concludes, in reference to her husband.

So we find out first off that Palin was lying when she said she never watched the SNL skits with he volume up. This was obvious at the time, but it's good to have it proven in her own words. We also found out that she is lying to Oprah when she says she wanted to do SNL, while Schmidt (for whom one almost feels pity) was opposed.

Again: this is not an artful spin. It is a lie that can be revealed by reading her own fricking emails!

C'mon, Levi. Tell us what you got.

Drama For Obama

Mike Crowley reviews the many gaffes of the secretary of state:

The hallmark of Hillary’s tenure as America’s top diplomat has hardly been robotic precision. It has instead been a curious propensity for public statements that require amendment, clarification, and implicit retraction–as illustrated, most recently, by comments she made about Israeli settlement policy that reportedly baffled even her own aides. Perhaps because she is a smart and independent-minded woman, Hillary has taken a self-consciously blunt-speaking approach to her job and shows no sign of apologizing for it. “She’s candid,” says State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley. “And, if you look at the response she’s received around the world, I think most people appreciate it.” But it’s not a style in keeping with a White House that generally demands complete message control. For a president who hates drama, Barack Obama has installed a secretary of state who keeps creating it.

Her unwitting (I assume) gift to Netanyahu is part of my column this week. Sucking up to Israelis is a habit that some may find hard to kick.