Some gorgeous jazz vocals for the afternoon from Sharon Clark. (Full disclosure: my best friend plays the piano on this YouTube.)
Cuomo’s Quote Update
The full context suggests the "shuck and jive" metaphor was not referring to Obama at all:
Update: We just talked with Karlin, who told us that Cuomo’s "shuck and jive" remark was "so far removed, temporally and contextually, from any discussion of Obama," that he didn’t hear it as a reference to Obama at all. Karlin pointed us to Newsday’s Spin Cycle blog, which has posted a partial transcript of the radio interview made from a tape provided to it by Cuomo’s office. The transcript confirms that Cuomo was answering a general question about the retail nature of politics in Iowa and New Hampshire generally, and there’s nothing in his long answer to suggest that he was referring to Obama rather than to politicians in general.
“Sub-Prime”
Word of the year for the American Dialect Society.
Kenya Update
Opposition leader Odinga refuses negotiations. Which may be an implicit endorsement of violence.
A Question Of Experience?
"Since the birth of our nation change has been won by young presidents and young leaders who have shown that experience is not defined by time in Washington and years in office it is defined by wisdom and instinct and vision … The only charge that rings false is the one that tells you not to hope for a better America. Don’t let anyone tell you to accept the downsizing of the American dream," – John Kerry, endorsing Barack Obama today in South Carolina.
Dissent Of The Day
A reader writes:
I think you’re missing something, and snippily telling people to Google Obama on this or that is not an answer. Those of us who follow this stuff closely know that Obama has position papers on this or that. But Hillary is doing a better job of conveying substance, and that resonates with people for whom her policies will have an impact on their everyday lives. For the most part, these are people who don’t spend their time on their laptops all day — they’re busying holding down one or two jobs, taking their kids to school, maybe trying to get a college degree at night —- and they certainly don’t have time to Google a bunch of white papers, or read blogs. They get their info from speeches, ads, magazines, debates, and the mass media generally.
What do they hear from Obama? Some of those most inspiring and uplifting rhetoric they’ve heard from any major politician in decades. They hear a way better sermon than they’ll ever hear at church. What do they hear from Hillary? Admittedly more plodding speeches about how she will advance this or that policy on healthcare, education, etc. Most importantly, they see someone who, while somewhat plodding, just seems like she will work very hard on solving problems that matter to them.
Furthermore, when people read articles on Obama, including your very well-written one in The Atlantic, what type of info do they get? Soaring prose on how Obama’s "face" will change the world, how inspiring he is, how he will "bring us together" in some vague, unquantifiable way. I’ve got to say — his advocates aren’t doing him any favors with lightweight defenses of him.
These are intangibles to some degree, Andrew, but Obama kind of comes off like a motivational speaker (at which he excels) while Hillary comes off as a nose-to-the-grindstone executive. Which one speaks to people where they live?
“Don’t Let Those Good Old Boys Stop You”
Anne Rice – a quintessential Clinton supporter – makes her case for Clinton. Notice how she uses the name "Hillary" all the time. To me, that’s a sexist double-standard. To Rice, treating Clinton like a male senator is sexist. Maybe it’s generational. David Kuo sees the same thing.
Quote For The Day
"Remember this: the Democrat machine candidate always wins; the upstart insurgents never do. It’s all you need to know. Forget all the polls," – Rush Limbaugh, today.
The World’s Cheapest Car
A nano!
Fred Calls
Ed listens.